Skip to content

· Private foundation

The B Attitudes Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$499k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.1MInternational$980kArts & Culture$510kHealth$218kReligion$161kHuman Services$37kPhilanthropy$31kFood & Nutrition$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $168k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $313k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN HERITAGE SCHOOL$100,000
Individual grant recipient$98,331
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST$64,920
Individual grant recipient$50,000
SHARETIX FOUNDATION$46,000
LDS PHILANTHROPIES$38,800
HOPE FOR FERTILITY FOUNDATION$25,000
AMERICAN PATRIOT SERVICE CORP$20,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$18,000
DAVIS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,500
CUMORAH ACADEMY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
CASPER COLLEGE$3,900
BOUNTIFUL FOOD PANTRY$3,000
UINTAH HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EAGLE CONDOR FOUNDATION: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
ID
NV
WY
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 38 repeat orgs$255k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
37

Total granted

$3.2M
$169k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+25%

Still filing today

26%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthInternationalPublic BenefitPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SHARETIX FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $391k · revenue +21% · 52% of their budget
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $121k · revenue +97%
  • OR
    OUR RESCUE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $90k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • BY
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $33k
  • EC
    ENSIGN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $29k
  • AS
    AMERICAN SERVICE CORPS
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Arts Academy

Utah Arts Academy is a premier academic and arts-focused school. By combining rigorous academic programming with pre-professional training in a wide array of arts (theatre, dance, music, visual and media arts), we inspire our students'…

Education
2
Venture Academy

Inspire the rising generation to reach the heights of their potential, ignite their curiosity to venture into challenging new learning experiences, and through service, empower them to be leaders who are committed to family and community…

Education
3
Timpanogos Academy Foundation

To establish a school where each student gains the scholarly knowledge and skills vital to becoming a self-motivated, lifelong learner and to succeed in the rapidly evolving and complex world. This mission will be accomplished by using the…

Education
4
Utah County Academy of Sciences

A Utah public charter school supported by state and federal funding.

Education
5
The Ranches Academy Incorporated

Public charter school educating Utah students.

Education
6
Terra Academy

Terra academy focuses on each student as a "unique" whole person in a global society by providing individualized instruction in a community learning model through educational experiences including a broad range of curricular options and…

Education
7
Utah's Promise

Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.

Philanthropy
8
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
9
Utah Geological Foundation
—
10
Salt Lake Education Foundation

To promote student success in the Salt Lake City School District by using private donations to supplement children's educational experiences.

Philanthropy
11
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
12
Utah Military Academy

None

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Hope for Fertility Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $752,837 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN HERITAGE SCHOOL: $375,000 · OtherAMERICAN HERITAGE SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $197,022 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLDS PHILANTHROPIES: $196,900 · OtherLDS PHILANTHROPIESDAISY ACADEMY: $175,000 · OtherDAISY ACADEMYLDS CHURCH: $121,220 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC: $120,750 · OtherDavis Education Foundation: $120,500 · OtherDAISY SCHOOL: $101,648 · OtherLDS CHURCH SCHOOLS: $101,100 · Other+54 more: $559,501 · Other+54 moreSHARETIX FOUNDATION: $391,280 · PhilanthropySHARETIX FOUN…The Community Foundation of Utah: $30,000 · PhilanthropyThe Community…OUR RESCUE: $90,100 · Arts & CultureTHE HOPE FOR FERTILITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthNEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $2,501 · HealthAMERICAN PATRIOT SERVICE CORPORATION: $20,000 · Public BenefitSAGAMORE INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 · Public BenefitUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationThe Constitution Education Foundation: $5,000 · EducationSpectrum Academy: $2,500 · EducationMOUNTAIN SUNRISE ACADEMY: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $550 · EducationAcademy for Creating Enterprise: $15,000 · InternationalTifie Humanitarian: $983 · International
Other$2,821,478Philanthropy$421,280Arts & Culture$90,100Health$82,501Public Benefit$22,000Education$19,050International$15,983

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHARETIX FOUNDATION: $391,280 over 8y, 52% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC: $120,750 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetDavis Education Foundation: $120,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $90,100 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOPE FOR FERTILITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetThe Community Foundation of Utah: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN PATRIOT SERVICE CORPORATION: $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAcademy for Creating Enterprise: $15,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE CONDOR FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Constitution Education Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Other Side Academy: $4,658 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH FUTURES: $2,501 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSpectrum Academy: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAHS FIRST LADY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAGAMORE INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HOBE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNTAIN SUNRISE ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTifie Humanitarian: $983 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSutherland Institute: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOMS FOUNDATION AT VALLEY FORGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHARETIX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC ↗
  • Who funds Davis Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE FOR FERTILITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Community Foundation of Utah ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PATRIOT SERVICE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Academy for Creating Enterprise ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE CONDOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Constitution Education Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT27.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · University Impact · The Community Foundation of Utah · The Span Foundation · Semnani Family Foundation · Beesley Family Foundation · Ssir Cares Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The B Attitudes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The B Attitudes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The B Attitudes Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The B Attitudes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on B Attitudes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph