· Private foundation
The Avery Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k20 grants · $18k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $109k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIEDREICHS ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANC | $108,735 |
| PASCO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION INC | $7,388 |
| LAMPLIGHTERS INC | $2,650 |
| ARISE ALLIANCE INSTITUTE INC | $1,500 |
| NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY | $1,000 |
| FISH & WILDLIFE FDN OF FLORIDA INC | $1,000 |
| PENDRAGON INC | $500 |
| VETERANS ART CENTER TAMPA BAY | $500 |
| CHRISTOPHER & DANA REEVES FDN | $500 |
| SPECIAL OPERATIONS MEMORIAL FUND | $500 |
| METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES | $500 |
| FDNY 343 RIDE INC | $250 |
| MERRIE-WOODE FOUNDATION INC | $250 |
| WHEELCHAIRS4KIDS | $250 |
| ADIRONDACK FOUNDATION | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FAFRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE5× · 2017–2024 · $559k · revenue +74%
- PSPAUL SMITHS COLLEGE4× · 2017–2020 · $18k · revenue +4%
- CCCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC3× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +76%
Funded once
- NFNATIONAL FOOTBALL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $25k
University of South Florida Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +132%- PAPEPIN ACADEMIES FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue -73%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.
The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Orlando health is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.
For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Organization mission: florida's children first is a non-profit, nonpartisan, independent advocacy organization committed to protecting and advancing the rights of children and youth impacted by the child welfare, juvenile justice, and…
To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.
Fpca's mission is to continuously enhance law enforcement by providing a unified voice for police chiefs statewide and nationally, serving as the public face of law enforcement executive leadership, and providing a forum for executive…
Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Manatee Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Saranac Lake Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIEDREICH'S ATAXIA RESEARCH ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PAUL SMITHS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PASCO COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FISH & WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA I ↗
- Who funds PEPIN ACADEMIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LAMPLIGHTERS INC ↗
- Who funds ARISE ALLIANCE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds LIFT INC ↗
- Who funds Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OPERATORS TRANSITION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RUTH ECKERD HALL INC ↗
- Who funds Special Operations Memorial Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds STARTING RIGHT NOW ↗
- Who funds PENDRAGON INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Mary & Bob Sierra Family Foundation Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Clark Family Fund Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Danker-Basham Foundation Inc · Chris T Sullivan Foundation Inc · Cloudsplitter Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Avery Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pasco County Fair Association Inc — 53% of income from government
- Champions for Children Inc — 14% of income from government
- Florida Sheriffs Association Inc — 4% of income from government
- Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
- Fish & Wildlife Foundation of Florida I — 1% of income from government
- Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
- St Joseph's Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.