Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Avalon Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$24kHuman Services$19kRecreation & Sports$18kReligion$10kEducation$5kFood & Nutrition$5kHealth$2kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$307k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ETHIOPIA SKATE$2,500
LUMINA ALLIANCE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ECHO$1,500
FAMILY CARE NETWORK$1,500
CAMP OCEAN PINES$1,250
MORRO BAY ART CENTER$1,000
STUDIOS ON THE PARK$1,000
DIVERSITY COALITION$1,000
ESTERO BAY KINDNESS COALITION$500
TORTOISE AND ANIMAL RESCUE$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LUMINA ALLIANCE: $2k → 12%CAMP OCEAN PINES: $5k → 12%CAMP OCEAN PINES: $3k → 12%CAMP OCEAN PINES: $2k → 12%CAMP OCEAN PINES: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$75k · 9 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$75k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+12%

Still filing today

67%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FAMILY CARE NETWORK INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +4%
  • CO
    CAMP OCEAN PINES INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $11k · revenue +161%
  • PR
    PASO ROBLES YOUTH ARTS CENTER
    4× · 2020–2023 · $11k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • L
    LUMINA
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • HI
    HEALING IN THE MARGINS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +73%
  • T
    TPAC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Surf Point Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
San Luis Obispo County Arts Council Dba Arts Obispo

To advance the visual, literary and performing arts in san luis obispo county through programs that promote local arts planning and collaboration; the arts in educational settings; public access to the arts; and opportunities for artists…

3
San Luis Obispo Medical Education and Research Foundation Inc
4
Occidental Center for the Arts

Occidental Center for the Arts exists to provide a welcoming and accessible venue for the performing and visual arts in Sonoma County California for local regional national and international artists. our mission is to enrich our community…

Arts & Culture
5
San Luis Obispo Repertory Theatre

Slo rep strengthens theatre's cultural influence and enriches the central coast by producing professional theatre, nurturing artists and providing theatre education for children and adults.

Arts & Culture
6
Casa Dolores Co Claudia Mclaughlin
Arts & Culture
7
Central Coast Overdose Prevention

CCODP aims to eliminate overdoses and other negative substance-related outcomes in the Tri-County communities and beyond by increasing awareness, reducing stigma, educating the public, improving access to community support services and…

Health
8
Willapa Bay AiR
Arts & Culture
9
Hijos Del Sol Arts Productions

Hijos Del Sol Arts Productions creates opportunities, inspires children and youth, and builds community in the Salinas Valley through visual and multicultural arts education, experiences, and mentorship, where young people are respected,…

Arts & Culture
10
Palenke Arts

Palenke Arts is a multicultural arts Organization whose mission is to educate, inspire and transform the community of Seaside through the arts.

Arts & Culture
11
Arts Benicia

Arts benicia's mission is to stimulate, educate and nurture cultural life in benicia primarily through the visual arts. this community based non-profit organization provides exhibitions, educational programs and classes that support…

Arts & Culture
12
Peninsula Museum of Art

Engage with art shows, education and programs. exhibiting artworks by san francisco bay area artists.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Studios On the Park Inc and the most unlike its peers is Santa Lucia School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAMILY CARE NETWORK INC — $16,500 · OtherFAMILY CARE NETWORK INCECHO INC — $10,200 · OtherECHO INCETHIOPIA SKATE — $6,500 · OtherETHIOPIA SKATESAN LUIS OBISPO FOOD BANK — $4,500 · OtherSAN LUIS OBISPO FOOD BANKEDUCATIO — $3,000 · OtherEDUCATIOIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherLUMINA — $2,000 · Other+6 more — $4,950 · Other+6 morePASO ROBLES YOUTH ARTS CENTER — $11,000 · Arts & CulturePASO ROBLES YOUTH ARTS CENT…STUDIOS ON THE PARK INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureSTUDIOS ON THE PARK INC+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureCAMP OCEAN PINES INC — $11,325 · Human ServicesCAMP OCEAN PINES…LUMINA ALLIANCE — $2,000 · Human ServicesLUMINA ALLIANCESANTA LUCIA SCHOOL — $2,000 · EducationHEALING IN THE MARGINS INC — $2,000 · HealthATASCADERO PRINTERY FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Community ImprovementESTERO BAY KINDNESS COALITION — $500 · Philanthropy
Other$49,650Arts & Culture$21,500Human Services$13,325Education$2,000Health$2,000Community Improvement$1,000Philanthropy$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAMILY CARE NETWORK INC — $16,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP OCEAN PINES INC — $11,325 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPASO ROBLES YOUTH ARTS CENTER — $11,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetECHO INC — $10,200 over 5y, 11% of budgetSTUDIOS ON THE PARK INC — $10,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSANTA LUCIA SCHOOL — $2,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLUMINA ALLIANCE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING IN THE MARGINS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetATASCADERO PRINTERY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetESTERO BAY KINDNESS COALITION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN LUIS OBISPO MUSEUM OF ART — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY CARE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds CAMP OCEAN PINES INC
  • Who funds PASO ROBLES YOUTH ARTS CENTER
  • Who funds ECHO INC
  • Who funds STUDIOS ON THE PARK INC
  • Who funds SANTA LUCIA SCHOOL
  • Who funds LUMINA ALLIANCE
  • Who funds HEALING IN THE MARGINS INC
  • Who funds ATASCADERO PRINTERY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ESTERO BAY KINDNESS COALITION
  • Who funds SAN LUIS OBISPO MUSEUM OF ART

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation San Luis ObispoCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation San Luis Obispo · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Avalon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Avalon Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Avalon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph