Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Aufrichtig Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$523kReligion$182kInternational$46kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $118k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Joseph Florence Mandel Jewish Day S$35,000
Perelman Jewish Day School$13,000
Yeshiva of Greater Washington$10,000
Chabad Lubavitch of Delaware County$10,000
American Friends of Israel Elwyn$10,000
Dickinson College$10,000
Talmudic University$10,000
Hillel International$10,000
Israel Emergency Alliance dba Stand$10,000
Congregation Ohev Shalom$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Friends of Israel Elwyn: $11k → 7%American Friends of Israel Elwyn: $10k → 7%American Friends of Israel Elwyn: $8k → 7%American Friends of Israel Elwyn: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$648k · 8 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$648k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+48%

Still filing today

50%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalReligionHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    RAYMOND AND RUTH PERELMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $378k · revenue +56%
  • DICKINSON COLLEGE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +34%
  • AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ELWYN
    4× · 2022–2025 · $33k · revenue +231%

Funded once

  • JF
    JOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +48%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CO
    Chabad of Delaware County
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
2
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
University of Judaism Foundation
—
5
Passaic Hebrew Institute

YBH of Passaic, a K-8 yeshiva in Passaic, New Jersey, emphasizes the primacy of Torah and Yiras Shomayim and offers a serious and comprehensive General Studies curriculum. YBH stresses the importance of middos tovos and acting with…

Education
6
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life At the Penn State University

To enrich the lives of jewish and undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. penn state hillel's student leaders, professionals, and lay leaders are dedicated to creating a pluralistic, welcoming, and…

—
8
Yad Laniyim
Philanthropy
9
The EmeryWeiner Center for Jewish Education

To educate and develop students whose intellect, moral character and Jewish identity provide a lifelong foundation for personal growth, commitment to the Jewish people and Tikkun Olam--improving the world in which we live.

Education
10
Rabbi David L Silver Yeshiva Academy

To provide education in general and judiac studies

Education
11
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

—
12
B'nai Brith Hillel Foundation At Princeton

Cjl partners with students and other members of the princeton community to sustain and grow a welcoming, multi-faceted and pluralistic jewish community that is fully-integrated into the fabric of campus life and which provides personally…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joseph & Florence Mandel Jewish Day School; the most unlike its peers is Dickinson College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAYMOND AND RUTH PERELMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $378,000 · OtherRAYMOND AND RUTH PERELMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOLPenn Hillel: $70,000 · OtherPenn HillelJoseph Florence Mandel Jewish Day S: $35,000 · OtherJoseph Florence Mandel Jewish Day SThe Kivunim Institute: $20,000 · Other+6 more: $67,000 · Other+6 moreDICKINSON COLLEGE: $110,000 · EducationDICKINSON COLLEGEJOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $25,000 · EducationJOSEPH & FLORENCE MAN…YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $10,000 · EducationYESHIVA OF GREATER WA…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ELWYN: $33,101 · Human ServicesISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $10,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel: $3,000 · InternationalHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $10,000 · ReligionLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Health
Other$570,000Education$145,000Human Services$33,101International$13,000Religion$10,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAYMOND AND RUTH PERELMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $378,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE: $110,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ELWYN: $33,101 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetJOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAYMOND AND RUTH PERELMAN JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds DICKINSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ELWYN ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Aufrichtig Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Aufrichtig Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Yeshiva of Greater Washington Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Aufrichtig Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Aufrichtig Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aufrichtig’s filings →

More from the funding graph