Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Auerbach Schiro Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$260k
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$374kArts & Culture$338kInternational$125kFood & Nutrition$114kReligion$85kHealth$58kHousing & Shelter$53kYouth Development$46kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $195k
$1,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD$40,000
MIDWEST FOODBANK$30,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$25,000
FORGE CITY WORKS$25,000
THEATERWORKS$20,000
REAL ARTWAYS$15,000
HARTFORD STAGE$15,000
CT MUSEUM OF CULTURE & HISTORY$15,000
CT PUBLIC BROADCASTING NETWORK$10,000
WADSWORTH ATHENEUM$7,500
THE BUSHNELL$7,500
CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL$5,668
Individual grant recipient$5,500
MALTA HOUSE$5,000
THE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SUMMIT ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $1k → 9%MIDWEST FOODBANK: $30k → 11%SUMMIT ADAPTIVE SPORTS: $250 → 9%HARC INC: $250 → 11%FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION: $250 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $3k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 11%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $5k → 11%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $5k → 11%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $5k → 11%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$769k · 53 repeat orgs$239k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

53 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
48

Total granted

$769k
$147k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+2%

Still filing today

70%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    3× · 2020–2024 · $125k · revenue +4%
  • HS
    HARTFORD STAGE COMPANY INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $75k · revenue +23%
  • RA
    REAL ART WAYS INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $50k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • C4
    CT 4-H RESOURCE CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $45k
  • C4
    CT 4-H FARM
    one grant, 2021 · $42k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE CT
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc

Connecticut public broadcasting, inc. will inform, educate and inspire the people of connecticut, connecting and empowering the people of ct through outstanding journalism, storytelling, education and experiences, to make our state a more…

Arts & Culture
3
Hartford Foundation for Public Giving

The hartford foundation for public giving puts philanthropy into action to create lasting solutions that result in vibrant communities within the greater hartford region. as the region's community foundation, it is a public, grantmaking…

Philanthropy
4
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
8
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
9
Hartford Public Library

The mission of the hartford public library is to provide free resources that inspire reading, guide learning, and encourage individual exploration

Education
10
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
11
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
12
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Partners in Action Inc; the most unlike its peers is Reporters Without Borders Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/61
Grantees still filing
39/61
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL BETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE: $61,362 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL BETH ISRAEL SYN…CT 4-H RESOURCE CENTER: $45,425 · OtherCT 4-H RESOURCE CENTERMUTUAL HOUSING ASSOCIATION: $43,000 · OtherMUTUAL HOUSING ASSOCIATIONCT 4-H FARM: $41,900 · OtherCT 4-H FARMFOODSHARE INC: $40,000 · OtherFOODSHARE INCCT FORESTS AND PARKS ASSOC: $39,300 · OtherCT FORESTS AND PARKS ASSOCCT PUBLIC BROADCASTING NETWORK: $24,000 · OtherHARRIET BEECHER STOWE CENTER INC: $22,750 · OtherUCONN HILLEL: $19,000 · OtherFORGE CITY WORKS INC: $25,000 · Other+65 more: $132,683 · Other+65 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD: $371,337 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER H…+1 more: $1,500 · PhilanthropyHARTFORD STAGE COMPANY INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureHARTFORD STAGE COMPA…REAL ART WAYS INC: $50,350 · Arts & CultureREAL ART WAYS INCTHE HORACE BUSHNELL MEMORIAL HALL: $47,500 · Arts & CultureTHE HORACE BUSHNELL …THEATERWORKS INC: $47,500 · Arts & CultureTHEATERWORKS INCWADSWORTH ATHENEUM MUSEUM OF ART: $13,500 · Arts & Culture+9 more: $20,850 · Arts & Culture+9 moreThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $125,000 · InternationalThe Americ…+1 more: $2,750 · InternationalMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $30,000 · Human ServicesHANDS ON HARTFORD INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE INC: $4,500 · Human Services+3 more: $2,250 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $40,000 · HealthConnecticut Foundation for Dental Outreach Inc: $2,500 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Health+2 more: $1,250 · HealthFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $7,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $5,500 · EducationNEW ENGLAND JEWISH ACADEMY: $3,840 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $3,500 · EducationCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 · EducationSOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER HARTFORD INC: $1,110 · EducationKINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC: $1,000 · EducationBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC: $1,000 · Education+3 more: $1,250 · Education
Other$494,420Philanthropy$372,837Arts & Culture$254,700International$127,750Human Services$56,750Health$45,750Education$27,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD: $371,337 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $125,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHARTFORD STAGE COMPANY INC: $75,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetREAL ART WAYS INC: $50,350 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE HORACE BUSHNELL MEMORIAL HALL: $47,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATERWORKS INC: $47,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFOODSHARE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORGE CITY WORKS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHARRIET BEECHER STOWE CENTER INC: $22,750 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHANDS ON HARTFORD INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWADSWORTH ATHENEUM MUSEUM OF ART: $13,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETH PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $6,650 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKNOX INC: $5,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIMMACARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMALTA HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE INC: $4,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetNEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND JEWISH ACADEMY: $3,840 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPrison Policy Initiative: $3,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVOICES OF HOPE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetConnecticut Foundation for Dental Outreach Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALLETX: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Hartford Arts Council Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROVISION MINISTRY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP GREATER HARTFORD INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetReporters Without Borders Inc: $1,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF GREATER HARTFORD INC: $1,110 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARTFORD GAY AND LESBIAN HEALTH COLLECTIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds HARTFORD STAGE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds REAL ART WAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HORACE BUSHNELL MEMORIAL HALL ↗
  • Who funds THEATERWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP ↗
  • Who funds FORGE CITY WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds HARRIET BEECHER STOWE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HANDS ON HARTFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds WADSWORTH ATHENEUM MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds KNOX INC ↗
  • Who funds IMMACARE INC ↗
  • Who funds MALTA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND JEWISH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Prison Policy Initiative ↗
  • Who funds VOICES OF HOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT55.3× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The William and Alice Mortensen Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Zachs Family Foundation Inc · J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc · Sbm Charitable Foundation Inc · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Robert & Margaret Patricelli Family Foundation · Edward C & Ann T Roberts Foundation · Cheryl Chase & Stuart Bear Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Auerbach Schiro Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Auerbach Schiro Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Chrysalis Center Inc: 93% of income from government
  • Harc Inc: 92% of income from government
  • Community Partners in Action Inc: 90% of income from government
  • The Bridge Family Center Inc: 61% of income from government
  • Immacare Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Open Communities Alliance Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Real Art Ways Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Community Health Services Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Greater Hartford Arts Council Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Hands On Hartford Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Hartford Gay and Lesbian Health Collective Inc: 9% of income from government
  • New Britain Museum of American Art Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art: 5% of income from government
  • Mystic Seaport Museum Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Harriet Beecher Stowe Center Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Theaterworks Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Hartford Stage Company Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Knox Inc: 2% of income from government
  • University of Hartford: 1% of income from government
  • Solomon Schechter Day School of Greater Hartford Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Forge City Works Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
  • Kingswood Oxford School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 116 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Auerbach Schiro’s filings →

More from the funding graph