Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ashtabula Rotary Foundation

- THE OBJECT OF ROTARY IS TO ENCOURAGE AND FOSTER THE IDEAL OF SERVICE AS A BASIS OF WORTHY ENTERPRISE.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Education$14kHealth$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kHuman Services$6kArts & Culture$5kCommunity Improvement$4kInternational$4kEmployment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$920
Median grant
3
States reached
$172k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HALO$1,019
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
ASHTABULA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA$1,000
KINGSVILLE LIBRARY$1,000
LEADERSHIP ASHTABULA COUNTY INC$1,000
CIVIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ASHTABULA COUNTY$1,000
ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL$920
INTERACT$500
Individual grant recipient$400
HUBBARD HOUSE$250
DISASTER AID USA$250
DISASTER AID USA$250
ROTARY INTERNATIONAL$250
BEATITUDE HOUSE$88
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DISASTER AID USA: $250 → 11%DISASTER AID USA: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of The Ashtabula Rotary Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 77% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 71% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Ashtabula Rotary Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 21% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$34k · 11 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$34k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-11%

Still filing today

18%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePublic BenefitInternationalCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $9k
  • AL
    ASHTABULA LIBRARY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k
  • KL
    KINGSVILLE LIBRARY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $4k

Funded once

  • AC
    ASHTABULA COUNTY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • AM
    ASHTABULA MARITIME & SURFACE TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -11%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ashtabula County Animal Protective League

To operate an animal shelter, educate the public, and prevent cruelty to animals.

Animals
2
Growth Partnership for Ashtabula Co

To achieve economic prosperity and improve the quality of life for all of ashtabula county.

3
Ashtabula County Council On Aging Inc

Organization that operates a multi-purpose senior center for persons sixty years of age or older and their spouses, regardless of age, living in ashtabula county, ohio. the agency also provides older americans with health assessment,…

Human Services
4
Ashtabula River Foundation

To support the restoration of the ashtabula river, and to own and operate the former coast guard station located on the east bank of the ashtabula river ("station"). with respect to the station, the foundation will preserve and develop the…

Philanthropy
5
Ashtabula County Day Care Center Inc

To provide high-quality child care to infants and children.

Human Services
6
Ashtabula Homeless Shelterinc

Provide emergency shelter and meals, case management and assessment to homeless individuals and families from the ashtabula county and surrounding areas.

Housing & Shelter
7
Catholic Charities of Ashtabula County

A multi-service agency serving ashtabula county, devoted to helping meet basic human needs. its concentration is on poverty reduction, strengthening families, proclaiming life and building community. most of those served were at or below…

8
United Way of Ashtabula County

United way of ashtabula county serves as a responsible steward of donated resources to impact the critical needs of our community in the areas of health, education and financial stability.

Philanthropy
9
Goodwill Industries of Ashtabula Inc

Serve disabled and disadvantaged adults seeking to develop job and interpersonal skills necessary to compete in the working world.

10
Ashtabula County Continued Education Support Services

To provide ashtabula county children and parents a greater awareness of the opportunity for higher education and to assist families with discovering and obtaining the financial resources necessary to reach the goal of a higher education.

Education
11
Akron Ashtabula Cleveland Baptist Assoc

Provide a safe, friendly place for the spiritual, physical and mental development of youth and adults

Religion
12
The Ashtabula Foundation Inc
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ashtabula County Family Ymca and the most unlike its peers is The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $8,900 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALASHTABULA COUNTY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER — $6,658 · OtherASHTABULA COUNTY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTERASHTABULA LIBRARY — $5,010 · OtherASHTABULA LIBRARYKINGSVILLE LIBRARY — $4,227 · OtherKINGSVILLE LIBRARYKENT STATE UNIVERSITY — $4,000 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient — $3,796 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHALO — $3,197 · OtherHALOIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION — $2,000 · Other+10 more — $5,178 · Other+10 moreASHTABULA MARITIME & SURFACE TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureASHTABULA…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $4,040 · InternationalREMOTE AREA MEDICAL — $482 · InternationalLEADERSHIP ASHTABULA COUNTY INC — $3,000 · Public BenefitCIVIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ASHTABULA COUNTY — $1,000 · PhilanthropyDISASTER AID USA INC — $500 · Human ServicesASHTABULA DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $168 · Community Improvement
Other$47,466Arts & Culture$5,000International$4,522Public Benefit$3,000Philanthropy$1,000Human Services$500Community Improvement$168

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetASHTABULA MARITIME & SURFACE TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $4,040 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP ASHTABULA COUNTY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetASHTABULA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDISASTER AID USA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREMOTE AREA MEDICAL — $482 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEATITUDE HOUSE INC — $178 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASHTABULA DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $168 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASHTABULA MARITIME & SURFACE TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP ASHTABULA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds ASHTABULA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA
  • Who funds CIVIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ASHTABULA COUNTY
  • Who funds DISASTER AID USA INC
  • Who funds REMOTE AREA MEDICAL
  • Who funds BEATITUDE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds ASHTABULA DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robert S Morrison FoundationOH15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robert S Morrison Foundation · The Business of Good Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ashtabula Rotary Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ashtabula Rotary Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ashtabula Rotary Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph