Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Arvd Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$265k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$754kPublic Safety & Disaster$370kHuman Services$156kFood & Nutrition$120kReligion$87kCivil Rights$48kHousing & Shelter$46kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $173k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$75,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$30,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$25,000
NOURISHING HOPE$25,000
RAICES$22,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$20,000
HOME 2 HOME$20,000
REFUGEE ONE$20,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$10,000
OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP PARISH$5,000
MISERICORDIA HOME$5,000
LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$2,500
GENESIS AT THE CRO$1,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT$1,000
ST PAUL OF THE CROSS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MISERICORDIA HOME: $12k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $5k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $5k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $5k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $5k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $5k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $5k → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
IN
CT
CA
CO
KY
MD
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 22 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
15

Total granted

$1.5M
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+12%

Still filing today

64%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalReligionCivil RightsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $220k · revenue +81%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +98%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $88k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • LP
    LAKEVIEW PANTRY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • MO
    MISSIONARY OBLATES
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • R
    RACIES
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
2
Chicago Refugee Coalition

The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.

Human Services
3
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
4
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
5
Refugepoint Inc

Refugepoint partners with refugees to access life-changing solutions and transforms how the world supports them. refugepoint seeks to expand access to lasting solutions for refugees, especially those facing vulnerabilities who are…

International
6
Refugee Protection International Inc

Rpi's mission is to partner with local non-gov organizations and others to strengthen protection and self-reliance among refugees and internally displaced persons near conflict zones.

International
7
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
8
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
9
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
10
Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition

Tirrc is a statewide, immigrant and refugee-led collaboration. our mission is to build power, amplify our voices, and organize communities to advocate for our rights. our vision is a stronger, more inclusive tennessee where people of all…

Civil Rights
11
Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge

Witnessing to god's love for all people, we stand with and advocate for migrants and refugees, transforming communities through ministries of service and justice.

—
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rainbow Railroad Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Dynamic Catholic Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $345,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESHOME 2 HOME: $107,200 · OtherHOME 2 HOMENOURISHING HOPE: $52,900 · OtherNOURISHING HOPEOUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP PARISH: $51,450 · OtherOUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP PARISHHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $45,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYLAKEVIEW PANTRY: $25,000 · Other+19 more: $46,442 · Other+19 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC: $220,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $135,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCSave The Children Federation Inc: $87,500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncMercy Corps: $67,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $55,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 · InternationalHEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC: $75,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $47,500 · Civil Rights+1 more: $3,500 · Civil RightsREFUGEEONE: $75,000 · Religion+2 more: $1,400 · ReligionMISERICORDIA HOME: $47,000 · Human ServicesGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $40,000 · Food & NutritionRAINBOW RAILROAD USA INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyGENESIS AT THE CROSSROADS INC: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$672,992International$589,500Civil Rights$126,000Religion$76,400Human Services$47,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Philanthropy$37,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $220,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $135,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $87,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEEONE: $75,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Corps: $67,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $52,900 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $47,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $47,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW RAILROAD USA INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGENESIS AT THE CROSSROADS INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST FRANCIS CATHOLIC KITCHEN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROMISE POINTE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY CHURCHES UNITED: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEEONE ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW RAILROAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS AT THE CROSSROADS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS CATHOLIC KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PROMISE POINTE INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY CHURCHES UNITED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Arvd Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Arvd Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arvd’s filings →

More from the funding graph