Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Arts Center of the Capital Region

To lead through advancement of the contemporary arts in the capital region through education, presentation, audience development, providing services and advocacy.

$279k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$551kFood & Nutrition$11k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $21,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $279,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $258,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,500
Median grant
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHENECTADY LIGHT OPERA CO INC$10,000
ALBANY PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,500
REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SUPPORT SERV EMMAUS$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS INC: $7k → 14%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER HUDSON VALLEY: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

16%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$91k · 5 repeat orgs$472k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
41

Total granted

$91k
$456k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+14%

Still filing today

60%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    Hamilton Hill Drop In Arts & Crafts Center Inc
    3× · 2019–2023 · $42k · revenue +37%
  • RA
    REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SUPPORT SERV EMMAUS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k
  • TI
    Tri-City India Association Inc
    2× · 2021–2024 · $14k · revenue -122%

Funded once

  • V
    VARIOUS
    one grant, 2017 · $84k
  • VR
    VARIOUS RECIPIENTS - ALL UNDER 5000
    one grant, 2018 · $83k
  • AL
    ARTS LETTERS AND NUMBERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Cultural Center of the Sidney Arts and Culture Exchange

Our mission is to enrich and connect the community of Sidney, New York through diverse arts and entertainment experiences.

Arts & Culture
2
Seneca Falls Performing Arts Center
Arts & Culture
3
The Troy Savings Bank Music Hall Fo
4
Clinton Arts Center
5
Arts & Cultural Council of Dec County

Promote Art and Cultural Activities

Arts & Culture
6
Cny Arts Center Inc

The organization's mission is to offer training and educational opportunities in artistic skills and technique; and present programming in visual, literary and performing arts.

Arts & Culture
7
Ukrainian Cultural Center of Syracuse Inc

N/a

Arts & Culture
8
The Folkus Project Incorporated

To foster and promote traditional, contemporary, and multicultural folk music and related performing arts in Syracuse and Central NY.

Arts & Culture
9
Utica Monday Nite Corporation

Initiated in 1997 the organizations mission is to promote a regional arts economy by making the arts and humanities available and accessible to all Utica NY residents and visitors from the wider region.

Education
10
Nittany Performing Arts Centre

To create a performing arts center, easily accessible for audiences in centre county, with optimal acoustics and an exhilarating atmosphere. the center will serve as a performance venue and education center for the community's performing…

Arts & Culture
11
Schenectady Civic Players Inc

To foster, promote and nurture the natural talents of those citizens interested in play production, stagecraft and arts management; to stimulate appreciation and participation in suporting high quality theatrical prodcutions for the…

Arts & Culture
12
Dutchess County Art Association Inc

To foster and perpetuate appreciation of the visual arts

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colonie Senior Services Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Arvilla E Diver Memorial Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 27. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%4%<5yr10%17%5–10yr16%21%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr15%21%35–55yr27%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%2%<5yr10%7%5–10yr16%21%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr15%20%35–55yr27%34%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
8%
383/4,623

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VARIOUS — $83,500 · OtherVARIOUSVARIOUS RECIPIENTS - ALL UNDER 5000 — $83,000 · OtherVARIOUS RECIPIENTS - ALL UNDER 5000ARTS LETTERS AND NUMBERS INC — $15,000 · OtherREFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SUPPORT SERV EMMAUS — $14,500 · Other+30 more — $230,902 · Other+30 moreHamilton Hill Drop In Arts & Crafts Center Inc — $42,000 · Arts & CultureHamilton Hill…Tri-City India Association Inc — $14,000 · Arts & CultureTri-City Indi…NEW RUSSIA CULTURAL CENTER INC — $4,000 · Arts & CultureNEW RUSSIA CU…440 STATE STREET — $4,000 · Arts & Culture440 STATE STR…CREATIVE ACTION UNLIMITED INC — $3,700 · Arts & CultureCREATIVE ACTI…RUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE — $10,000 · EducationCIRCADIUM — $10,000 · EducationTECH VALLEY CENTER OF GRAVITY INC — $4,000 · EducationCOLLAR WORKS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesCOLONIE SENIOR SERVICES CENTERS INC — $7,350 · Human ServicesINDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC — $2,400 · Human ServicesTROY WATERFRONT FARMERS MARKET INC — $11,100 · Food & NutritionPROSPECT PARK FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF TIVOLI LAKE PRESERVE AND FARM INC — $2,600 · Environment
Other$426,902Arts & Culture$67,700Education$24,000Human Services$19,750Food & Nutrition$11,100Recreation & Sports$10,000Environment$2,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHamilton Hill Drop In Arts & Crafts Center Inc — $42,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetTROY WATERFRONT FARMERS MARKET INC — $11,100 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetRUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROSPECT PARK FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetCOLLAR WORKS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOLONIE SENIOR SERVICES CENTERS INC — $7,350 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF PRUYN HOUSE — $5,600 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTROY FOUNDRY THEATRE — $4,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budget440 STATE STREET — $4,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTECH VALLEY CENTER OF GRAVITY INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF SCHENECTADY COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY — $4,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSCHENECTADY INNER CITY MINISTRY INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCREATIVE ACTION UNLIMITED INC — $3,700 over 1y, 11% of budgetArvilla E Diver Memorial Library — $2,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetINDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC — $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hamilton Hill Drop In Arts & Crafts Center Inc
  • Who funds Tri-City India Association Inc
  • Who funds TROY WATERFRONT FARMERS MARKET INC
  • Who funds RUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE
  • Who funds PROSPECT PARK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CIRCADIUM
  • Who funds COLLAR WORKS INC
  • Who funds COLONIE SENIOR SERVICES CENTERS INC
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF PRUYN HOUSE
  • Who funds TROY FOUNDRY THEATRE
  • Who funds NISKAYUNA NURSERY SCHOOL
  • Who funds NEW RUSSIA CULTURAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds 440 STATE STREET

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Price Chopper's Golub FoundationNY19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Capital District Physicians' Health Plan Inc · The Troy Savings Bank Charitable Fo · The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Arts Center of the Capital Region funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph