Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Armstrong Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$291k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.0MReligion$351kInternational$287kCivil Rights$189kPublic Benefit$187kHuman Services$135kCommunity Improvement$101kFood & Nutrition$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLORADO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$105,000
ASONE MINISTRIES$50,000
DARE2SHARE$25,000
MOMENTUM GLOBAL$20,000
GLOBAL DMM$15,000
CROSS PURPOSE$10,000
AMBLESIDE SCHOOL$10,000
THE WOODSON CENTER$10,000
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$10,000
AMERICANS UNITED FOR LIFE$5,000
SUSAN B ANTHONY PRO-LIFE AMERICA$5,000
LEADERSHIP PROGRAM OF THE ROCKIES$5,000
NATIONAL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY$5,000
ONE CHANCE TO GROW UP$5,000
MIZEL INSTITUTE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASONE MINISTRIES: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
SD
PA
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 31 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
14

Total granted

$4.3M
$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+81%

Still filing today

81%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionPublic BenefitCivil RightsSocial ScienceInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Colorado Christian University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +50%
  • MG
    MOMENTUM GLOBAL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $272k · revenue +165% · 30% of their budget
  • D2
    Dare 2 Share Ministries
    8× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GLOUCESTER INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +557% · 31% of their budget
  • WL
    WHITESTONE LEADERSHIP FORUM
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
4
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
5
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
6
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
7
American Press Institute Inc

American press institute acts as a scout on the frontier of technology and audience behavior to identify where change is occurring and helps news organizations learn how to implement and scale that change successfully so they have a…

Arts & Culture
8
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
9
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
10
Center of Theological Inquiry

The Center of Theological Inquiry is an independent research institution with an international visiting scholar program which convenes researchers in an ideal setting for interdisciplinary inquiries where theology casts light on global…

Religion
11
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
12
American-German Institute Inc

The American-German Institute is a center for policy research and scholarship dedicated to the most important political, economic, and security issues confronting Germany and the United States in the global arena. AGI anticipates…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Global Dmm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
28/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Colorado Christian University: $2,834,000 · EducationColorado Christian University+10 more: $253,000 · Education+10 moreDare 2 Share Ministries: $190,000 · OtherDare 2 Share Mi…NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $80,000 · OtherNATIONAL TAXPAY…BREAKTHROUGH LEADERSHIP GROUP INC: $30,500 · OtherONE CHANCE TO GROW UP: $25,000 · OtherWOODSON CENTER: $60,000 · OtherWOODSON CENTERVIVOBLU WATER FOR ALL: $49,000 · OtherVIVOBLU WATER F…+19 more: $176,000 · Other+19 moreMOMENTUM GLOBAL INC: $272,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalAsOne Ministries: $125,000 · Human ServicesThe Denver Institute: $72,500 · ReligionGlobal DMM: $25,000 · ReligionJOHN JAY INSTITUTE FOR FAITH SOCIETY AND LAW INC: $10,000 · ReligionALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $74,500 · Civil RightsAmericans United for Life Inc: $25,000 · Civil RightsCITIZENS FOR SELF-GOVERNANCE: $5,000 · Civil RightsTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Public BenefitLeadership Program of the Rockies: $40,000 · Public BenefitINDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $7,500 · Public Benefit
Education$3,087,000Other$610,500International$273,000Human Services$125,000Religion$107,500Civil Rights$104,500Public Benefit$87,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColorado Christian University: $2,834,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetMOMENTUM GLOBAL INC: $272,000 over 8y, 30% of budgetDare 2 Share Ministries: $190,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetAsOne Ministries: $125,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $74,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Denver Institute: $72,500 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetAugustine Institute Inc: $62,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRELIGIOUS FREEDOM INSTITUTE INC: $60,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetWOODSON CENTER: $60,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE GLOUCESTER INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetVIVOBLU WATER FOR ALL: $49,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetAMBLESIDE SCHOOL: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Program of the Rockies: $40,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH LEADERSHIP GROUP INC: $30,500 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetAmericans United for Life Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe King's College: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal DMM: $25,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetStep Denver: $20,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Becket Fund: $19,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLION GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN JAY INSTITUTE FOR FAITH SOCIETY AND LAW INC: $10,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetINDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN INNOVATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS FOR SELF-GOVERNANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR LABOR RELATIONS RESEARCH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON SENSE INSTITUTE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPARENTS CHALLENGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTommy Spaulding Leadership Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEdify: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN YOUTH MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Colorado Christian University ↗
  • Who funds MOMENTUM GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Dare 2 Share Ministries ↗
  • Who funds AsOne Ministries ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds The Denver Institute ↗
  • Who funds Augustine Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds RELIGIOUS FREEDOM INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODSON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOUCESTER INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds VIVOBLU WATER FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds AMBLESIDE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Program of the Rockies ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH LEADERSHIP GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds Americans United for Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds The King's College ↗
  • Who funds Global DMM ↗
  • Who funds Step Denver ↗
  • Who funds The Becket Fund ↗
  • Who funds LION GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOHN JAY INSTITUTE FOR FAITH SOCIETY AND LAW INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN INNOVATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR SELF-GOVERNANCE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR LABOR RELATIONS RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO23.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Adolph Coors Foundation · Daniels Fund · Donors Trust Inc · El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Bruce Benson Foundation · Considine Family Foundation · Tyl Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Armstrong Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Armstrong Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Armstrong Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Armstrong Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Armstrong Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph