Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Armand Hammer Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$834k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$774k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202022.

Education$954kHealth$860kArts & Culture$512kReligion$160kYouth Development$156kRecreation & Sports$63kFood & Nutrition$16kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $250k+1 grant · $774k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$89M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$773,656
NASHVILLE LIFE CHURCH$15,000
WORLD MISSIONS GROUP$15,000
CHRIST HOLY SANCTIFIED CHURCH OF AMERICA$15,000
DENNIS TINERINO MINISTRIES$5,000
THE TRANSFORMING CENTER$5,000
RIDGEVIEW HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DREAM FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%DREAM FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
NV
PA
CA
MO
DE
AZ
TN
DC
OK
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 7 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
30

Total granted

$1.4M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+13%

Still filing today

71%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $834k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
ReligionYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PETERSEN AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $352k · revenue +116%
  • PU
    PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $150k · revenue +30%
  • AC
    ARIZONA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $25k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1.5M
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SB COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $69k
  • BM
    BUD Ministries Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $52k · revenue +160%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
4
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
5
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
6
Azusa Pacific University

Apu is an evangelical christian community of disciples and scholars who seek to advance the work of god through academic excellence in liberal arts and professional programs of higher education that encourage development of a christian…

Education
7
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
8
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
9
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
10
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
11
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

12
University Camps

Unicamp student volunteers harness the healing power of the wilderness to provide a unique outdoor camping experience for at-risk children. through relationship-building, leadership and character development, and just plain fun, unicamp…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Boys and Girls Clubs of Santa Barbara County and the most unlike its peers is Project Seven Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsYouth Development CentersUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Fallen First Responder Supp…Environmental Advocacy Orga…Hospice Care ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Christian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%18%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr17%36%20–35yr11%23%35–55yr13%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%39%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr17%50%20–35yr11%3%35–55yr13%7%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,952

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $1,518,916 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGRACE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $773,656 · OtherGRACE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY+31 more — $493,751 · Other+31 more911 AT EASE INTERNATIONAL INC — $800,000 · Health911 AT EASE INTERNATI…PETERSEN AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $351,500 · Arts & CulturePETERSEN A…ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAM…PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · EducationARIZONA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · EducationBUD Ministries Inc — $51,921 · ReligionTHE TRANSFORMING CENTER — $5,000 · ReligionKEITH HUDSON MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 · ReligionUNITED BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentWilderness Youth Project Inc — $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentDALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Human Services
Other$2,786,323Health$800,000Arts & Culture$401,500Education$175,000Religion$61,921Youth Development$47,000Human Services$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget911 AT EASE INTERNATIONAL INC — $800,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetPETERSEN AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $351,500 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUD Ministries Inc — $51,921 over 1y, 23% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMontecito Motor Classic — $50,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetUNITED BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY — $40,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetARIZONA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMIRACLE FLIGHTS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGenYOUTH Incorporated — $10,298 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS EAGLES BASKETBALL CLUB — $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF SANTA BARBARA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWilderness Youth Project Inc — $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWATER BUFFALO CLUB INC DBA WE BENEFIT CHILDREN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TRANSFORMING CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA AVOCADO FESTIVAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetKEITH HUDSON MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT SEVEN INSTITUTE — $1,716 over 1y, 100% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · G a Fowler Family Foundation · Patricia Bragg Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · The Turpin-Allebrand Family Charitable Foundation · Brittingham Family Foundation · June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr · James S Bower Foundation · Towbes Foundation · Mosher Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Armand Hammer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Armand Hammer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Armand Hammer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph