Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ao Allenius Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$25kEducation$12kPhilanthropy$7kArts & Culture$4kFood & Nutrition$2kReligion$2kInternational$2kAnimals$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$388
Median grant
5
States reached
$219k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM$7,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
LIFELINE CHRISTIAN MISSION$750
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW YORK$500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES$500
Individual grant recipient$500
COVENANT HOUSE$500
Individual grant recipient$388
GLEN HEAD ELEMENTARY PTO$300
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$300
MEALS ON WHEELS$250
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$250
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$250
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$250
NY COMMON PANTRY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CAMP KESEM: $264 → 14%THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $105 → 20%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $100 → 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $8k → 17%MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$73k · 17 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
20

Total granted

$73k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+31%

Still filing today

53%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $9k · revenue +20%
  • TL
    The Loyalty Foundation
    4× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +73%
  • TF
    THE FLOATING HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $4k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • N
    NYCOM
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • NB
    NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +35%
  • NY
    NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation

To support its member healthcare organizations further innovation and excellence in patient care, teaching, and research.

Health
11
American Institute for Cancer Research

Aicr champions the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce…

Health
12
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthright International Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Loyalty Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $29,261 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPS 281 PTA: $8,200 · OtherPS 281 PTAMSQ PALLIATIVE CARE: $6,500 · OtherMSQ PALLIATIVE CARENYCOM: $4,489 · OtherNYCOMMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,889 · Other+18 more: $5,560 · Other+18 moreMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesMOUNT SINAI …COVENANT HOUSE: $500 · Human Services+3 more: $469 · Human ServicesTHE FLOATING HOSPITAL INC: $3,750 · HealthTHE FLOATIN…American Heart Association Inc: $2,088 · HealthAmerican He…NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · HealthNATIONAL BR…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $500 · HealthRONALD MCDO…SHIR FOR LIFE INC: $500 · HealthSHIR FOR LI…+2 more: $403 · HealthThe Loyalty Foundation: $6,530 · PhilanthropyGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $1,482 · EducationCornell University: $750 · EducationNEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $500 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $300 · EducationGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $900 · InternationalHEALTHRIGHT INTERNATIONAL INC: $606 · InternationalMAYANZA INC: $250 · InternationalRAZOM INC: $77 · InternationalHumane World for Animals Inc: $500 · Animals
Other$55,899Human Services$9,469Health$8,741Philanthropy$6,530Education$3,032International$1,833Animals$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Loyalty Foundation: $6,530 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetTHE FLOATING HOSPITAL INC: $3,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,088 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,889 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $1,482 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLifeline Christian Mission: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHRIGHT INTERNATIONAL INC: $606 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHIR FOR LIFE INC: $500 over 1y, 93% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $264 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $153 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAVERLY COMMUNITY HOUSE INC: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAZOM INC: $77 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ao Allenius Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ao Allenius Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ao Allenius Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Ao Allenius Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ao Allenius Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph