Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Antonio V Glassberg Educational Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$166k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$78k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.2MRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $19k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $78k
$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$652k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL$78,000
LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL SOUTH$18,500
ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS$9,000
MOREAU CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$6,000
DESMET JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
THE STEWART SCHOOL$5,000
SANTA MARGARITA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
FATHER RYAN HIGH SCHOOL$3,500
URSULINE ACADEMY$3,500
MARY INSTITUTE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$3,500
DWIGHT ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL$3,000
BRIDGE ACADEMY$3,000
GROVES ACADEMY$3,000
WESTERN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$3,000
CHAMINADE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $5k → 11%Challenged Athletes Foundation: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
SC
LA
MS
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 61 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

61 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
41

Total granted

$1.0M
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+33%

Still filing today

36%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JB
    JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $346k · revenue +88%
  • AO
    ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS
    5× · 2020–2025 · $42k · revenue +153%
  • BS
    BRENTWOOD SCHOOL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $19k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • CB
    CHRISTIAN BROTHERS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • CP
    Christ Prince of Peace
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
  • CC
    Chaminade College Prep High School
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
2
Westminster Christian Private School Inc

To provide christian education to students in grades pre-k to 12.

Education
3
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
4
Westminster Academy

The school provides classical christian education to students in grades junior kindergarten through twelve.

Education
5
Flintridge Preparatory School

Learning with purpose in a diverse and nurturing community, flintridge prep students thrive in adolescence and grow as curious scholars, creative thinkers , empathetic leaders, and global citizens.

Education
6
Westside Neighborhood School

Wns is committed to creating a deeply caring community of lifelong learners that nurtures students from diverse backgrounds to reach their full potential, develop cultural competency, and inspire the world with their curiosity, innovation,…

Education
7
The Grosse Pointe Academy

The mission of the grosse pointe academy is to nurture, challenge and inspire the intellectual, creative and personal potential in each and every child.

Education
8
Manhattan Christian School

Education - private school grades preschool through twelfth

—
9
Darrow School

Darrow school is dedicated to serving students with diverse backgrounds and abilities, building on each student's talents and interests to inspire enduring confidence for success in college and life. this mission is accomplished through…

Education
10
The Chandler School

Chandler's mission is to provide each student with the highest quality and most academically challenging education in a nurturing, balanced and diverse environment. chandler strives to have its students gain a love of learning, a means of…

—
11
Axiom Christian Classical School

To provide a comprehensive Christian Classical education to grades 1-12.

Education
12
Dallas Christian School

Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Woodlynde School Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Prodigy Leadership Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $104,200 · OtherLUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUISFLINTRIDGE SACRED HEART ACADEMY: $21,700 · Other+79 more: $519,125 · Other+79 moreJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $345,750 · EducationJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOLACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS: $41,500 · EducationACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ACADEMY OF ST LOUISTHE WOODLYNDE SCHOOL CORPORATION: $20,000 · EducationBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $19,440 · Education+18 more: $125,241 · Education+18 moreCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$645,025Education$551,931Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $345,750 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS: $41,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHE WOODLYNDE SCHOOL CORPORATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $19,440 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STEWARD SCHOOL: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PALM VALLEY SCHOOL: $17,331 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWESTLAND SCHOOL INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTupelo Christian Preparatory School: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANTERBURY SCHOOL INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROMISE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $9,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $7,910 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WAVERLY SCHOOL: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BUCKLEY SCHOOL: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGROVES ACADEMY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CRAIG SCHOOL: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDONELSON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMBROSE SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EDISON SCHOOL: $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetST LUKE'S SCHOOL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTSIDE ACADEMICS SCHOOL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDECATUR CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds THE WOODLYNDE SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BRENTWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE STEWARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE PALM VALLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds WESTLAND SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Tupelo Christian Preparatory School ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
  • Who funds CANTERBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds PROMISE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds PRODIGY LEADERSHIP ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE WAVERLY SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anheuser-Busch FoundationMO19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anheuser-Busch Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · World Wide Technology Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · Carpenter Family Childrens Foundation Inc · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Ibm International Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Antonio V Glassberg Educational Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Antonio V Glassberg Educational Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Perkins School for the Blind: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Antonio V Glassberg Educational Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Antonio V Glassberg Educational Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Antonio V Glassberg Educational’s filings →

More from the funding graph