· Private foundation
The Antonacci Family Foundation for Charitable Giving Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of THE ANTONACCI FAMILY FOUNDATION FOR CHARITABLE GIVING INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k94 grants · $228k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $456k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $205k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE | $95,000 |
| WILBRAHAM & MONSON ACADEMY | $60,000 |
| SUFFIELD ACADEMY | $50,000 |
| BAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION | $37,500 |
| EASTERN STATES EXPOSITION FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| POWER FORWARD INC | $26,500 |
| THE ANGEL FUND | $25,000 |
| STABLE RECOVERY | $25,000 |
| NEW VOCATIONS | $25,000 |
| FAYETTE ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| POLICE ACTIVITY LEAGUE OF WTBY | $25,000 |
| ST MARYS CATHOLIC CHURCH | $22,551 |
| BANK OF AMERICA | $22,207 |
| FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
149 repeat relationships — 79 still active in FY2024, 70 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $239k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE8× · 2017–2024 · $325k · revenue +70%- CFCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC3× · 2020–2022 · $258k · revenue +97%
THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC7× · 2017–2024 · $209k · revenue +133%
Funded once
- ARADMINISTRATIVE & RESIDUAL A&R COPEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $420k · revenue +83%
- FIFOODSHARE INCone grant, 2020 · $130k · revenue +25%
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INCone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
The mission of the university of massachusetts foundation, inc. is to foster and promote the growth, progress and general welfare of the university of massachusetts as stated in the original 1950 articles of organization. the foundation…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish of New Hampshire Inc and the most unlike its peers is Somers Beautification. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
146 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 146 of the 330 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ADMINISTRATIVE & RESIDUAL A&R COPE ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds WILBRAHAM AND MONSON ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Bay Path University ↗
- Who funds FOODSHARE INC ↗
- Who funds POLICE ACTIVITY LEAGUE OF WATERBURY ↗
- Who funds NEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION ↗
- Who funds QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EASTERN STATES EXPOSITION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds THE ORPHAN DISEASE PATHWAY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds FAYETTE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds ENFIELD LOAVES & FISHES ↗
- Who funds SOMERS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds American International College ↗
- Who funds SUFFIELD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds SAY YES TO EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds PIONEER VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Beveridge Family Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Rockville Bank Community Foundation Inc · The Irene E and George A Davis Foundation · Easthampton Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Florence Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · United Bank Foundation Massachusetts Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Antonacci Family Foundation for Charitable Giving Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Alliance for Community Empowerment Inc — 100% of income from government
- Hartford Communities That Care Inc — 95% of income from government
- Servicenet Inc — 82% of income from government
- Girls for Technology Inc — 80% of income from government
- Brain Injury Alliance of Connecticut — 62% of income from government
- Special Olympics Connecticut Inc — 42% of income from government
- Connecticut River Watershed Council Inc — 40% of income from government
- Applied Behavioral Rehabilitation Instit — 35% of income from government
- Charter Oak Health Center Inc — 34% of income from government
- Educational Resources for Children Inc — 28% of income from government
- Connecticut Science Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Forest Park Zoological Society Inc — 12% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Eastern States Exposition Foundation Inc — 6% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Gosnold Inc — 5% of income from government
- Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art — 5% of income from government
- The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital — 3% of income from government
- Bay Path University — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- University of Saint Joseph — 2% of income from government
- Rachel's Table of Western Massachusetts Inc — 2% of income from government
- Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Lyme Art Association Inc — 1% of income from government
- Western New England University — 1% of income from government
- American International College — 1% of income from government
- Springfield College — 1% of income from government
- Cityspace Inc — 1% of income from government
- Quinnipiac University — 0% of income from government
- Hartford Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Baystate Health Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wilbraham and Monson Academy — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Franciscan Life Center Network Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Antonacci Family Foundation for Charitable Giving Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Antonacci Family Foundation for Charitable Giving Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.