Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Anonymous Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$434k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$918kInternational$351kHuman Services$330kHealth$125kEducation$121kYouth Development$60kScience & Tech$40kArts & Culture$32k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $339k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$35,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Josiah Venture$90,000
Hope International$46,000
Samaritan's Purse$35,000
Emit USA Inc$35,000
Wounded Warrior Project$35,000
The Well House$35,000
The Foundry Ministries$35,000
Restoration Academy$35,000
Aspire Movement$35,000
STEPS Ministries$35,000
Emit USA Inc$13,200
Josiah Venture$3,600
Compassion International$989
World Vision$420
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Wounded Warrior Project: $35k → 14%Wounded Warrior Project: $25k → 14%The Lovelady Center: $5k → 16%Wounded Warrior Project: $25k → 14%The Foundry Ministries: $35k → 16%Wounded Warrior Project: $20k → 14%The Foundry Ministries: $25k → 16%The Foundry Ministries: $20k → 16%The Foundry Ministries: $20k → 16%The Foundry Ministries: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
PA
CO
NC
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 15 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$1.9M
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+39%

Still filing today

80%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JV
    Josiah Venture
    8× · 2017–2024 · $629k · revenue +46%
  • HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $260k · revenue +140%
  • EU
    Emit USA Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • AC
    Alabama Coalition for Healthy Mothers and Children - Aspire Movement
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • SB
    STUDIO BY THE TRACKS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +39%
  • FR
    FREEDOM RAIN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +129%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Hope International University

The mission of hope international university is to empower students through christian higher education to serve the church and impact the world for christ. the university specializes in fields offering significant influence on society…

Education
4
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over seventy countries around the world.

International
5
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
6
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
7
World Hope Ministries International

Training pastors, growing churches, and transforming communities for christ.

—
8
Redeem International

Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.

International
9
Entrust

Entrust's mission is to multiply church leaders through accessible, locally owned, reproducible training systems. this is accomplished through facilitated learning, assisting christians in gaining solid understanding of scripture, and…

—
10
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
11
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
12
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of jesus christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wounded Warrior Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Josiah Venture: $628,800 · ReligionJosiah VentureEmit USA Inc: $200,200 · ReligionEmit USA IncSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $80,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $260,000 · InternationalHOPE INTERNATIO…+2 more: $10,755 · InternationalTHE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOUNDRY …WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARR…+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesMillsaps College: $105,000 · EducationMillsaps C…THE RESTORATION ACADEMY: $60,000 · EducationTHE RESTOR…CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $15,000 · EducationCHICAGO HO…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationEmit USA Inc: $68,800 · OtherEmit USA I…RESTORATION ASSEMBLY: $26,500 · OtherRESTORATIO…Alabama Coalition for Healthy Mothers and Children - Aspire Movement: $25,000 · OtherAlabama Co…ASPIRE MOVEMENT INC: $60,000 · OtherASPIRE MOV…+1 more: $5,000 · OtherTHE WELLHOUSE INC: $110,000 · Housing & ShelterSTEPS MINISTRIES: $100,000 · Health
Religion$909,000International$270,755Human Services$220,000Education$181,000Other$185,300Housing & Shelter$110,000Health$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJosiah Venture: $628,800 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $260,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetEmit USA Inc: $200,200 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetTHE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES INC: $110,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WELLHOUSE INC: $110,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetMillsaps College: $105,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $105,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPS MINISTRIES: $100,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRE MOVEMENT INC: $60,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetTHE RESTORATION ACADEMY: $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $7,395 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDIO BY THE TRACKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFREEDOM RAIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $3,360 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHERSHORIN SCHIFF DAY SCHOOLS OF TOMORROW INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Josiah Venture ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Emit USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WELLHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Millsaps College ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPS MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRE MOVEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RESTORATION ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds STUDIO BY THE TRACKS INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM RAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds HERSHORIN SCHIFF DAY SCHOOLS OF TOMORROW INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Susan Mott Webb Charitable TrustAL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Nall-Whatley Foundation · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Altecstyslinger Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · W W Walker Jr and Family Charitable Foundation · The Robert and Lois Luckie Charitable Foundation · Pete M Hanna Charitable Foundation · Campbell Estelle S Char Foundation · Dunn-French Foundation · Debardeleben Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Anonymous Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Anonymous Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Anonymous Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Anonymous Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anonymous’ filings →

More from the funding graph