Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Anne R Monroe Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$201kHealth$69kAnimals$58kHuman Services$58kReligion$44kHousing & Shelter$35kPublic Benefit$33kYouth Development$5k
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIDING FOR THE HANDICAPPED OF WESTERN PA INC$5,775
NORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC$4,500
WHITE OAK ANIMAL SAFE HAVEN$4,000
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC$3,350
ST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH$3,200
E Lotz$3,000
T Snyder$3,000
N Cortes$3,000
ANCHORPOINT COUNSELING MINISTRY INC$2,775
HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE$2,700
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,525
K Greenwalt$2,500
AMERICAS VETDOGS THE VETERANS K9 CORPS INC$2,300
TONYSTRONG FOUNDATION INC$2,000
M Sudaric$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $500 → 9%BETHESDA CHILDRENS HOME LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $1k → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $3k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $500 → 9%BETHESDA CHILDRENS HOME LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $750 → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $3k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $500 → 9%BETHESDA CHILDRENS HOME LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $750 → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $3k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $500 → 9%BETHESDA CHILDRENS HOME LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $500 → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $3k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $250 → 9%BETHESDA CHILDRENS HOME LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $500 → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $3k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $250 → 9%BETHESDA CHILDRENS HOME LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $500 → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $2k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $250 → 9%BETHESDA CHILDRENS HOME LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $500 → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $2k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $250 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $2k → 9%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $250 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $750 → 9%FAMILYLINKS INC: $2k → 11%FAMILYLINKS INC: $1k → 11%FAMILYLINKS INC: $1k → 11%FAMILYLINKS INC: $1k → 11%FAMILYLINKS INC: $1k → 11%FAMILYLINKS INC: $1k → 11%FAMILYLINKS INC: $1k → 11%FAMILYLINKS INC: $750 → 11%FAMILYLINKS INC: $500 → 11%AUBERLE: $2k → 11%AUBERLE: $2k → 11%AUBERLE: $2k → 11%AUBERLE: $2k → 11%AUBERLE: $2k → 11%AUBERLE: $2k → 11%AUBERLE: $2k → 11%AUBERLE: $2k → 11%AUBERLE: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
WV
VA
NM
TN
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$311k · 20 repeat orgs$192k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
119

Total granted

$311k
$176k

Still filing today

65%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsPublic BenefitHealthPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    Riding for the Handicapped of Western PA Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +91%
  • NH
    NORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +15%
  • WO
    White Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill Shelter
    9× · 2017–2025 · $34k · revenue +211%

Funded once

  • GM
    G Martik
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • AJ
    A JONES
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • JB
    J BOOTH
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
2
Concern - Professional Services for Children Youth and Families

Concern's mission: concern brings hope, offers opportunity, and inspires change. concern's vision: to encourage growth and promote positive healthy lives.

Human Services
3
Ranch Hands Rescue

To provide a sanctuary for people and animals, founded on hope and healing for the long-term recovery of trauma victims, special needs animals, and male survivors of sex trafficking.

Animals
4
Faithfully K9 Service Dog and Dog Training

Empower disabled individuals to train a dog as their service dog, increasing their independence.

Animals
5
Puppies Behind Bars Inc

Puppies behind bars trains incarcerated individuals to raise service dogs for wounded war veterans and first responders, facility dogs for police departments, and explosive-detecton canines for law enforcement.

Human Services
6
Pets Return Home

The organization seeks to reduce the unecessary killing and suffering of healthy adoptable dogs at animal rescue and shelter organizations

Animals
7
St Vincent's Services Inc

For over 150 years, st. vincent's services, inc. (d/b/a heartshare st. vincent's services) has been a symbol of hope, compassion, and strength for vulnerable and under-resourced communities in new york city. (see on schedule o)

Human Services
8
Golden Opportunities for Independence Inc

To empower our clients to live independently, unencumbered by the challanges of daily living associated with medical disabilities. we match each client with a service dog that meets their individual needs. it is our goal to be flexible…

Animals
9
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
10
Dr Gertrude a Barber Center Inc

We "make dreams come true." we provide children and adults with autism, intellectual/developmental disabilities and behavioral health challenges and their families the education, services and resources needed to be self-reliant,…

Human Services
11
United States Veterans Initiative

The successful transition of military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services
12
Pinebrook Family Answers

The agency's mission states "pinebrook family answers nurtures and empowers children, adults and families by providing mental health services and community-based programs throughout the greater lehigh valley. we do this through initiatives…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Familylinks Inc; the most unlike its peers is White Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANCHORPOINT COUNSELING MINISTRY INC: $27,725 · OtherANCHORPOINT COUNSELING MINISTRY INCST JOHNS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $25,700 · OtherST JOHNS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCHWEST SIDE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $9,500 · Other+131 more: $212,750 · Other+131 moreGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $21,700 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES…AUBERLE: $16,475 · Human ServicesAUBERLEFAMILYLINKS INC: $10,050 · Human ServicesFAMILYLINKS …BETHESDA CHILDREN'S HOME: $4,500 · Human ServicesBETHESDA CHI…GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3,250 · Human ServicesGLADE RUN LU…White Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill Shelter: $34,000 · AnimalsWhite Oak A…HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $17,100 · AnimalsHUMANE ANIM…Riding for the Handicapped of Western PA Inc: $42,975 · HealthRiding fo…NORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC: $35,450 · PhilanthropyAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $21,600 · Public BenefitVets Helping Heroes Inc: $11,150 · Public BenefitSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $9,225 · Education
Other$275,675Human Services$55,975Animals$51,100Health$42,975Philanthropy$35,450Public Benefit$32,750Education$9,225

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRiding for the Handicapped of Western PA Inc: $42,975 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetNORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC: $35,450 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetWhite Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill Shelter: $34,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetANCHORPOINT COUNSELING MINISTRY INC: $27,725 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $21,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $21,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $17,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAUBERLE: $16,475 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVets Helping Heroes Inc: $11,150 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILYLINKS INC: $10,050 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $9,225 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA CHILDREN'S HOME: $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $3,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Riding for the Handicapped of Western PA Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH HILLS AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds White Oak Animal Safe Haven No Kill Shelter ↗
  • Who funds ANCHORPOINT COUNSELING MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds AUBERLE ↗
  • Who funds Vets Helping Heroes Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILYLINKS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Aj and Sigismunda Palumbo Charitable Trust · Tickets for Kids Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Anne R Monroe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Anne R Monroe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Anne R Monroe Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Anne R Monroe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 146 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anne R Monroe’s filings →

    More from the funding graph