Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Anna & Bw Cosentino Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$594k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$401k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 92% of THE ANNA & BW COSENTINO CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $178k
  • $250k+1 grant · $401k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASS GENERAL$401,000
BETH ISRAEL$41,000
NEWTON-WELLESLEY HOSPITAL$40,000
MAKE A WISH$20,000
BROOKFIELD CHURCH$20,000
SMILE MASS$15,000
ITALIAN HOME$12,384
CAMP PEMBROKE$10,000
CHARLES RIVER CENTER$10,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$10,000
FULL CIRCLE FRIENDS$5,000
CAMP FATIMA$2,000
THE FRIENDS OF DOVER$1,332
CHILDREN HOSPITAL$1,000
ASSUMPTION COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MAKE A WISH: $20k → 11%CHARLES RIVER CENTER: $10k → 7%CAMP PEMBROKE: $10k → 8%NEWTON-WELLESLEY HOSPITAL: $40k → 8%BROOKFIELD CHURCH: $20k → 11%TUNNELS TO TOWERS: $10k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $6k → 17%CAMP FATIMA: $6k → 9%CHARLES RIVER SCHOOL: $5k → 7%CARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS: $15k → 8%NEWTON WELLESLEY HOSPITAL: $10k → 8%ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY ANNUAL FUND: $5k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%CAMP FATIMA: $6k → 9%THE FRIENDS OF DOVER: $1k → 7%CARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS: $7k → 8%NEWTON WELLESLEY HOSPITAL: $5k → 8%ASSUMPTION COLLEGE ANNUAL FUND: $5k → 11%MASS GENERAL: $401k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%CAMP FATIMA: $2k → 9%CARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS: $4k → 8%ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY ANNUAL FUND: $5k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $15k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $2k → 17%FULL CIRCLE FRIENDS: $5k → 7%ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY ANNUAL FUND: $5k → 11%BETH ISRAEL: $41k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $2k → 17%SMILE MASS: $15k → 8%ASSUMPTION COLLEGE ANNUAL FUND: $4k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $6k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $2k → 17%BETH ISRAEL HOSPITAL: $15k → 7%ASSUMPTION COLLEGE ANNUAL FUND: $2k → 11%BETH ISRAEL HOSPITAL: $6k → 7%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $5k → 16%BETH ISRAEL HOSPITAL: $5k → 7%BETH ISRAEL HOSPITAL: $5k → 7%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $5k → 16%BETH ISRAEL HOSPITAL: $5k → 7%BETH ISRAEL HOSPITAL: $4k → 7%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $5k → 16%ITALIAN HOME: $12k → 16%ITALIAN HOME: $4k → 16%ITALIAN HOME: $3k → 16%ITALIAN HOME: $3k → 16%ITALIAN HOME: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$246k · 11 repeat orgs$546k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$246k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+32%

Still filing today

36%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $538k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $26k · revenue +40%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $18k · revenue +145%
  • AU
    ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2024 · $12k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHARLES RIVER SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +14%
  • RP
    ROSIE'S PLACE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +32%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Center for Developmental Disabilities

The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.

Human Services
3
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Easter Seals Massachusetts Inc

Easter seals massachusetts is a statewide community-based organization that has been helping people with disabilities to live full and independent lives for over 75 years. our mission is to provide services to ensure that children and…

Health
6
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
7
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
8
Cutchins Programs for Children & Families Inc

To help children and families transform significant emotional distress into increased resilience, hope and quality of life. to support the healing and learning process with innovation and integrity, and to serve as a model for best and…

Health
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

10
Barry & Florence Friedberg Jewish Community Center Inc

The friedberg jewish community center promotes jewish life and values by providing programs and services in a warm and caring environment for all people in every stage of life. we build a community one member at a time.

Religion
11
The May Institute Inc

May institute proudly serves individuals across the lifespan with autism, developmental disabilities, intellectual disabilities, neurological disorders, and behavior disorders to promote independence, choice, dignity, and respect. see…

Health
12
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charles River Association for Retarded Citizens Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MASS GENERAL — $401,000 · OtherMASS GENERALNEWTON-WELLESLEY HOSPITAL — $55,000 · OtherNEWTON-WELLESLEY HOSPITALBETH ISRAEL — $41,000 · OtherBETH ISRAELBETH ISRAEL HOSPITAL — $40,000 · OtherBETH ISRAEL HOSPITALMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL — $36,000 · OtherITALIAN HOME — $26,384 · OtherCARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS INC — $26,000 · Other+15 more — $103,332 · Other+15 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $18,000 · HealthSMILE MASS INC — $15,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $2,000 · HealthASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY — $11,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationTHE CHARLES RIVER SCHOOL INC — $5,000 · EducationROSIE'S PLACE INC — $1,000 · Housing & ShelterSPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC — $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$728,716Health$35,000Education$26,500Housing & Shelter$1,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS INC — $26,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE MASS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCAMP FATIMA INC — $14,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY — $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES RIVER ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELI AND BESSIE COHEN CAMPS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHARLES RIVER SCHOOL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds SMILE MASS INC
  • Who funds CAMP FATIMA INC
  • Who funds ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHARLES RIVER ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS INC
  • Who funds ELI AND BESSIE COHEN CAMPS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
  • Who funds THE CHARLES RIVER SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Anna & Bw Cosentino Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Cardinal Cushing Centers Inc40% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc1% of income from government
  • Assumption University0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph