Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ann M and David E Harden Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$67kCommunity Improvement$32kHuman Services$23kFood & Nutrition$14kArts & Culture$14kPhilanthropy$12kInternational$9kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$82k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NYSEF$16,300
ADIRONDACK FOUNDATION$5,000
HYANNISPORT CIVIC ASSOCIATION$2,000
CAMDEN FOOD PANTRY$2,000
COCHRANS SKI AREA$1,000
NORTHWOOD SCHOOL$1,000
CAMDEN ROTARY CLUB$1,000
ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY SKIING$500
HYANNISPORT MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND$500
ADIRONDACK EXPLORER$500
SOCIETY OF LITTLE FLOWERS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%NORTHWOOD SCHOOL: $52k → 13%CENTRAL NY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%ADIRONDACK HEALTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%YMCA: $10k → 16%SOCIETY OF THE LITTLE FLOWER: $7k → 7%COCHRANS SKI AREA: $1k → 10%HYANNISPORT CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $2k → 8%NORTHWOOD SCHOOL: $5k → 13%YEAZEL CATHOLIC EDUCATION FUND: $1k → 14%ADIRONDACK HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%YMCA: $2k → 16%SOCIETY OF LITTLE FLOWERS: $1k → 7%COCHRANS SKI AREA: $1k → 10%ADIRONDACK FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%CENTRAL NY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%YMCA: $1k → 16%NORTHWOOD SCHOOL: $2k → 13%CHRISTIAN BROTHERS ACADAMY: $1k → 14%NORTHWOOD SCHOOL: $1k → 13%IMAGINE GREATER CAMDEN: $10k → 16%SHORE OWNERS ASSOCIATION: $1k → 13%IMAGINE GREATER CAMDEN: $10k → 16%NEW YORK SKI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%IMAGINE GREATER CAMDEN: $10k → 16%NEW YORK SKI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%TOYS FOR TOTS: $2k → 16%NORTHWOOD SCHOOL: $1k → 13%TOYS FOR TOTS: $2k → 16%LAKE PLACID FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 13%CAMDEN FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 16%TOYS FOR TOTS: $2k → 16%NYSEF: $16k → 13%TOYS FOR TOTS: $2k → 16%NYSEF: $4k → 13%TOYS FOR TOTS: $2k → 16%NYSEF: $4k → 13%CAMDEN FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 16%NYSEF: $2k → 13%CAMDEN FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 16%CAMDEN CENTRAL SCHOOLS: $2k → 16%CAMDEN ROTARY CLUB: $1k → 16%CAMDEN FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 16%CAMDEN FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 16%CAMDEN ROTARY CLUB: $1k → 16%CAMDEN FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 16%CLUSTER 13: $1k → 16%CAMDEN FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 16%ABRAHAM HOUSE: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$182k · 14 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
19

Total granted

$182k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+8%

Still filing today

43%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NORTHWOOD SCHOOL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $61k · revenue +9%
  • IG
    IMAGINE GREATER CAMDEN INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +27% · 100% of their budget
  • TF
    TOYS FOR TOTS INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF THE LITTLE FLOWER
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF THE LITTLE FLOWER
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • AH
    ABRAHAM HOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adirondack Mountain Club Inc

Adk is the only non-profit organization in new york state dedicated to the conservation, preservation, and responsible recreational use of the new york state forest preserve and other parks, wild lands, and waters vital to our members and…

Environment
2
Adirondack Ski Touring Council Inc

To maintain over 100 miles of cross country ski and mountain bike trails in the vicinity of lake placid, new york.

Youth Development
3
Hyannisport Club Inc

To encourage, promote and protect athletic exercise, especially the game of golf, tennis courts, and clubhouse for the use and enjoyment of its members and their guests.

—
4
Adk Foundation
Philanthropy
5
New York State Ski Racing Association Alpine Inc

Under the auspices of united states ski and snowboard, nyssra fosters well developed programs and athletes by providing the structure, direction, resources and support required for athletes to reach their individual potential without…

—
6
Hyannis Yacht Club Foundation Inc

To promote, develop, maintain and oversee a sailing and swim school; to engage in the promotion and development of sailing and swimming activities; and to develop and engage in instructional and educational activity and programs related to…

Recreation & Sports
7
The Sailing Foundation of New York Inc

The foundation supports amateur sports participation in competitive sailing through clinics, coaching and other educational activities. the foundation also provides financial assistance to deserved athletes competing in regional, national…

Recreation & Sports
8
The Nipmuc Ski Club Inc
Recreation & Sports
9
Nansen Ski Club Inc

To promote, encourage, further advance and foster all non-mechanized winter sportsprincipally nordic skiing, in all its forms, making it accessible to the publicand sponsoring amateur competitions.

Environment
10
Adirondack North Country Association Inc

Support regional economic development in new york's 14 northernmost counties

Food & Nutrition
11
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
12
Nyac Athlete's Fund Inc

The mission of the fund is to foster, promote and encourage sports, exercises, sportsmanship and athletic contests, to pay or reimburse the cost of all necessary or proper travel, entry and related expenses of participants therein, and to…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adirondack Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Mu of Dke Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWOOD SCHOOL: $61,000 · OtherNORTHWOOD SCHOOLNYSEF: $31,300 · OtherNYSEFCAMDEN FOOD PANTRY: $13,000 · OtherCAMDEN FOOD PANTRYYMCA: $13,000 · OtherYMCATOYS FOR TOTS INC: $10,000 · OtherTOYS FOR TOTS INCCAMDEN ROTARY CLUB: $9,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF THE LITTLE FLOWER: $6,500 · Other+23 more: $30,550 · Other+23 moreIMAGINE GREATER CAMDEN INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementIMAGINE GREATER …HYANNISPORT CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Community ImprovementHYANNISPORT CIVI…ADIRONDACK FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE HYANNISPORT CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyCOCHRANS SKI AREA INC: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsCLUSTER 13: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterHYANNIS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $500 · EducationADIRONDACK EXPLORER INC: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$174,350Community Improvement$32,000Philanthropy$6,000Recreation & Sports$2,000Housing & Shelter$1,000Education$500Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWOOD SCHOOL: $61,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetIMAGINE GREATER CAMDEN INC: $30,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetTOYS FOR TOTS INC: $10,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetCAMDEN ROTARY CLUB: $9,000 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetADIRONDACK FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOCHRANS SKI AREA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK SKI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLUSTER 13: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMU OF DKE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHYANNIS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADIRONDACK EXPLORER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE GREATER CAMDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds TOYS FOR TOTS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMDEN ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ADIRONDACK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ABRAHAM HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds COCHRANS SKI AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK SKI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HYANNISPORT CIVIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CLUSTER 13 ↗
  • Who funds THE HYANNISPORT CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MU OF DKE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HYANNIS PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds ADIRONDACK EXPLORER INC ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ann M and David E Harden Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ann M and David E Harden Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hyannis Public Library: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ann M and David E Harden Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Ann M and David E Harden Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ann M and David E Harden’s filings →

More from the funding graph