· Private foundation
The Ammon Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k10 grants · $210k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $525k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY | $150,000 |
| CHARITY FUND BORZHAVSKA HOPE | $100,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS FALLEN HEROES INC | $75,000 |
| GARRETT SNIDER FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| LOVE TRIBE PROJECT INC | $50,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF METRO ATLANTA INC | $50,000 |
| KINGS RIDGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC | $50,000 |
| ARCH CORPORATION | $35,000 |
| THE PINK AGENDA INC | $25,000 |
| HAIRTOSTAY | $25,000 |
| TOUCHDOWN CLUB OF ATLANTA INC | $25,000 |
| CHEROKEE EMPLOYEE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| YOUTH HOMES | $20,000 |
| CHILDRENS HOUSE MONTESSORI SCHOOL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $185k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Bucknell University6× · 2017–2023 · $525k · revenue +45%- JAJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC4× · 2017–2020 · $500k · revenue +18%
- ANA NEW LEASH ON LIFE INC2× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +273%
Funded once
- TNTHE NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +46%
- MOMeals on Wheels Atlanta Incone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -27%
- TPTHE POWER OF A DREAM FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $100k · 31% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the jackson hole conservation alliance is to protect the wildlife, wild places and community character of jackson hole.
The mission of the Jackson hole chamber of commerce is to champion the interest of local businesses, enhance their prosperity and strengthen the economic climate of teton county
The mission of the association is to inspire "deeper connection, better understanding, and enduring support for our public lands."
Jackson hole wildlife foundation advances wildlife conservation driven by science, collaboration, and a community of volunteers.
In the jackson hole area, regardless of economic status, the opportunity to discover, embrace and participate in the sport of lacrosse, and to grow the sport while maintaining the highest ethical standards, providing quality coaching and…
The mission of teton valley ranch camp is to provide inspiring western adventure in the jackson hole and yellowstone area.
Junior achievement - rocky mountain, inc. (ja) is critical for inspiring and preparing young people to own their economic success. in partnership with business and educators, ja immerses students in disruptive, real-world experiences,…
The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.
The jackson hole international film festival (jhiff) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting and celebrating the art of filmmaking. jhiff exists to present the work of international creatives in an environment that inspires and…
Wyofile is an independent, nonprofit news service focused on the people, places and policy of wyoming. recognizing the rapid decline in resources among traditional news outlets, wyofile offers in-depth coverage of complicated subjects and…
The mission of the jackson hole community housing trust (cht) is to conserve community in teton county by developing essential, affordable housing. the cht is dedicated to the provision, management, and administration of affordable rental…
Yellowstone valley animal shelter is dedicated to strengthening the human-animal bond by providing compassionate and high-quality care, education, and resources to the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make a Wish Foundation of Wyoming and the most unlike its peers is Redwine Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Bucknell University ↗
- Who funds JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NO BARRIERS USA ↗
- Who funds THE NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARCH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Meals on Wheels Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds THE POWER OF A DREAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHEROKEE EMPLOYEE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS FALLEN HEROES INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH HOMES ↗
- Who funds A NEW LEASH ON LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds EQUUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TAYA AND CHRIS KYLE FOUNDATION SERVICE FAMILY STRONG ↗
- Who funds King's Ridge Christian School ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE HEALTH WORKS ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds LOVE TRIBE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds SAINT DAVID'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ROUND RIVER CONSERVATION STUDIES ↗
- Who funds THE DONALDSON ADOPTION INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA CANCER CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE PINK AGENDA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOUSE MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ANDEE'S ARMY ↗
- Who funds The Touchdown Club of Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF KAREN INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTS & HORSES INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds SALISBURY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Whitefish Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Angora Ridge Foundation · The Brooks Foundation · Karl M Johnson Foundation · Roundup for Safety Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Hughes Charitable Foundation · The High Stakes Foundation · The Andrew Allen Charitable Foundation · Treacy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Ammon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Ammon Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Ammon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.