Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ambler Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$336kReligion$82kEducation$30kEnvironment$11kFood & Nutrition$5kRecreation & Sports$4kHousing & Shelter$3kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$531k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS$14,004
CHURCH OF THE ATONEMENT$2,500
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$1,500
THE FRICK COLLECTION$1,500
JULLIARD SCHOOL$1,250
ST THOMAS CHURCH$1,000
564 PARK AVE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION$564
THE CHAPIN SCHOOL$500
THE RUSSIAN NOBILITY ASSOCIATION IN AMERICA INC$250
Individual grant recipient$120
QUOGUE FIRE DEPARTMENT$100
FUND FOR PARK AVENUE$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $927) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Search and Care: $427 → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $250 → 17%Health Advocates for Older People: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$441k · 25 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
12

Total granted

$441k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+51%

Still filing today

64%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $914 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YC
    YOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $286k · revenue +31%
  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    7× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +58%
  • JS
    JUILLIARD SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • MA
    MINES ADVISORY GROUP (MAG) AMERICA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MUSIC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF NEW ROCHELLE
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
2
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
3
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
4
Harvard Club of Ny Historical Foundation
Environment
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
7
New York Quadricentennial Committee

New york quadricentennial committee's mission is to celebrate the 400th anniversaries of the founding of today's new york city and educate the public about historical events that occurred in the new york city area.

Arts & Culture
8
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
9
Governors Island Corporation

The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…

Animals
10
New York Academy of Art

The new york academy of art is a unique graduate school that combines intensive technical training in the fine arts with active critical discourse. we believe that rigorously trained artists are best able to realize their artistic vision.…

—
11
The Trustees of the New York Society Library

The new york society library was founded in 1754 by the new york society, a civic-minded group formed in the belief that the availability of books would help the city of new york to prosper.

—
12
New York Public Radio

To make the mind more curious, the heart more open, and the spirit more joyful through excellent audio programming that is deeply rooted in new york.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Park Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INC: $285,854 · Arts & CultureYOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INCMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10,500 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $8,764 · Arts & CultureST THOMAS CHURCH: $62,000 · OtherST THOMAS CHURCHChurch of the Atonement: $20,000 · OtherChurch of the AtonementThe Frick Collection: $11,700 · OtherThe Frick CollectionMINES ADVISORY GROUP (MAG) AMERICA: $10,000 · OtherMINES ADVISORY GROUP (MAG) AMERIC…FRIENDS OF MUSIC: $10,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF MUSICCOLLEGE OF NEW ROCHELLE: $10,000 · OtherCOLLEGE OF NEW ROCHELLE+19 more: $18,425 · Other+19 moreJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $4,500 · EducationTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD: $4,100 · EducationCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $5,000 · Food & NutritionCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $3,500 · Recreation & SportsRussian Nobility Association in America: $250 · Recreation & SportsChristodora Inc: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DOE FUND INC: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Arts & Culture$305,118Other$142,125Education$18,600Food & Nutrition$5,000Recreation & Sports$3,750Philanthropy$1,000Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INC: $285,854 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $11,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget101 EAST 69TH STREET CONSERVANCY: $5,800 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD: $4,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetQUOGUE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3,700 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe English Concert In America Inc co Sabal & Associates: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBAR HARBOR FESTIVAL CORPORATION: $1,650 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetChristodora Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR PARK AVENUE NEW YORK INC: $700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSEARCH AND CARE INC: $677 over 2y, 0.0% of budget564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $564 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODLAWN CONSERVANCY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRussian Nobility Association in America: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetQUOGUE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG CONCERT ARTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF NEW ROCHELLE ↗
  • Who funds 101 EAST 69TH STREET CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD ↗
  • Who funds QUOGUE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds The English Concert In America Inc co Sabal & Associates ↗
  • Who funds BAR HARBOR FESTIVAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Christodora Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE DOE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR PARK AVENUE NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SEARCH AND CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds 564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ROYAL OAK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODLAWN CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Russian Nobility Association in America ↗
  • Who funds QUOGUE FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds QUOGUE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hoerle Foundation IncNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hoerle Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ambler Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ambler Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ambler Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph