Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Amanda Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Human Services$300kFood & Nutrition$148kCrime & Legal$85kEducation$68kPublic Safety & Disaster$66kReligion$63kHousing & Shelter$40kInternational$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Florence Fuller Child Development Centers$50,000
Breakthrough Miami Inc$25,000
CASA (Citrus County Abuse Shelter Assoc)$15,000
World Central Kitchen$15,000
Citrus County HarvestCitrus Cty Blessings$15,000
Christ The King Catholic Parish$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $308k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Florence Fuller Child Development Centers: $50k → 11%Florence Fuller Child Development Centers: $50k → 11%Florence Fuller Child Development Centers: $50k → 11%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNT: $8k → 17%Florence Fuller Child Development Centers: $50k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $50k → 11%Florence Fuller Child Development Centers: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$664k · 6 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

$664k
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
-1%

Still filing today

83%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalPhilanthropyEnvironmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $300k · revenue +63%
  • CC
    CITRUS COUNTY HARVEST INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +80%
  • CC
    CITRUS COUNTY ABUSE SHELTER ASSOCIA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • LH
    LOTUS HOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • FS
    FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -30%
  • THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding Dreams Inc

The mission of Feeding Dreams to combat childhood hunger and malnutrition that affect one in five children in Florida. Through grants, fundraising efforts, and school partnerships, we delivered 2.5 million highly nutritious meals to…

Food & Nutrition
2
Community Food Bank of San Benito County

Our mission is to provide food, nutritional education, and advocacy for those in need within san benito county, while pursuing our ultimate vision that no resident will suffer from hunger or malnutrition in san benito county.

Education
3
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
4
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
5
Florida School Nutrition Association Inc

Promote the health, nutrition, and education of children by supporting nutrition programs in our schools.

6
Florida Food Force Inc

To fight hunger through united forces/partnerships; provide nutritional food products that will nurture, sustain and enhance quality of life; facility, contribute and promote programs for hunger relief, strengthening our communities.

Food & Nutrition
7
Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc

Feeding Northeast Florida works to permanently end hunger in Northeast Florida by providing nutritious foods and other essential goods to people facing hunger, by addressing food insecurity, poverty and poor health through education and…

Food & Nutrition
8
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

9
Meals On Wheels Plus of Manatee Inc

The mission of meals on wheels plus of manatee, inc. is to assist individuals to live independently by providing nutrition and caring supportive services.

Food & Nutrition
10
Miami Valley Meals Inc

Miami valley meals' chefs transform bulk donated foods into hearty meals for those experiencing food insecurity. meals are distributed through a network of nonprofits in the miami valley. our professional culinary team efficiently elevates…

Food & Nutrition
11
Feeding Florida Inc

Feeding florida inc is committed to ending hunger. the association coordinates the efforts of member food banks throughout the state of florida, enabling them to provide a healthy and adequate food supply for people in need.

12
Food Bank for New York City

Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding South Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC — $300,000 · Human ServicesFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS I…+1 more — $7,500 · Human ServicesCITRUS COUNTY ABUSE SHELTER ASSOCIA — $85,000 · OtherCITRUS COUNTY ABUSE SHELTER ASS…ST AGNES CATHOLIC CHURCH — $50,000 · OtherST AGNES CATHOLIC CHURCHLOTUS HOUSE — $25,000 · OtherLOTUS HOUSETHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $20,000 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSAC…Lotus House co The Sundari Foundation — $15,000 · OtherLotus House co The Sundari Foun…FRONT LINE FOODS — $10,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF FATIMA — $7,500 · Other+2 more — $10,000 · OtherCITRUS COUNTY HARVEST INC — $90,000 · Food & NutritionCITRUS COUNTY H…FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOUTH F…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $71,000 · InternationalWORLD CENT…BREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC — $68,000 · EducationBREAKTHRO…Flyinghigh4haiti Inc — $10,500 · PhilanthropyMARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS BISCAYNE NATURE CENTER — $10,000 · Environment
Human Services$307,500Other$222,500Food & Nutrition$110,000International$71,000Education$68,000Philanthropy$10,500Environment$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC — $300,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCITRUS COUNTY HARVEST INC — $90,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetCITRUS COUNTY ABUSE SHELTER ASSOCIA — $85,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $71,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH MIAMI INC — $68,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFlyinghigh4haiti Inc — $10,500 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetMARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS BISCAYNE NATURE CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Publix Super Markets Charities IncFL13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Amanda Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph