Skip to content

South Carolina · Private foundation

The Amable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$199k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Amable Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Wheaton College, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year The Amable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $199k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’17
2
’20
1
’23
5
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2024
$30,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$48,603
Organizations funded a year
1 to 4
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations The Amable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’23
InternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving7$150k86%
FY20231$33k0%
FY20204$30k100%
FY20173$25kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$186kReligion$100kHealth$31kHuman Services$22kYouth Development$10kInternational$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Anglican Leadership Institute$58,27339%
Camino Counseling Center Inc$30,000177%
Rising Leaders Inc$22,000111%
Wheaton Bible Church$22,0001n/a
Young Life$10,00010%
Aruna Project$10,00011%
InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA$10,00010%
Serge Global Inc$5,00010%
Pickles People Inc$1,00011%

Plus 4 recipients with no EIN on record ($70k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Amable Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAnglican Leadership Institute: $58,273 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetCamino Counseling Center Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 77% of budgetRising Leaders Inc: $22,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetYoung Life: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAruna Project: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSerge Global Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPickles People Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Amable Foundation with peer funders

About The Amable Foundation

How much does The Amable Foundation give?
The Amable Foundation reported 8 grants totaling $198,603 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 4 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Amable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (52%), Religion (28%), Health (9%).
Who are The Amable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Anglican Leadership Institute ($58k), Camino Counseling Center Inc ($30k), Rising Leaders Inc ($22k).
Does The Amable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Amable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Amable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is The Amable Foundation based?
The Amable Foundation is based in SC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Amable’s filings →

More from the funding graph