Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Alton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$424k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$994kHuman Services$315kEducation$264kReligion$187kFood & Nutrition$95kYouth Development$71kHealth$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $132k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $236k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$7,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF CHRIST$56,316
HOYLETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES$37,544
CRISIS FOOD CENTER$30,000
HITZ MEMORIAL HOME$28,158
OPERATION BLESSING$25,000
ALTON SALVATION ARMY$18,772
FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS HOME$18,772
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ALTON$12,500
THE RESTORE NETWORK$12,000
WM BEDELL ACHIEVEMENT & RESOURCE CENTER$12,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,400
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CENTERSTONE$10,000
ST MARY'S SCHOOL$9,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CRISIS FOOD CENTER: $35k → 12%CRISIS FOOD CENTER: $30k → 12%CRISIS FOOD CENTER: $30k → 12%THE RESTORE NETWORK: $12k → 12%THE RESTORE NETWORK: $11k → 12%THE RESTORE NETWORK: $10k → 12%BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $9k → 12%BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 38 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
6

Total granted

$1.1M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
0%

Still filing today

18%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HY
    HOYLETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
    3× · 2023–2025 · $95k · revenue +25%
  • CF
    CRISIS FOOD CENTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $95k · revenue +13%
  • TR
    THE RESTORE NETWORK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $33k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • OH
    OSF HEALTHCARE ST ANTHONY'S
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • AL
    ALTON LITTLE THEATRE
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Alton Foundation
—
2
Alton Main Street Inc

Neighborhood and community development

—
3
Pride Incorporated

Beautification projects in alton il

—
4
The Alton Community Services Program Inc

The mission and purpose of alton community services is to provide relief to the poor, the distressed or underprivileged throughout alton and the surrounding area by meeting their physical and spiritual needs through the provision of food,…

—
5
Alderson Ministerial Association Inc

Assist low income individuals and families through operation of a thrift store, provide food through a food pantry, and assist homeowners with home repairs and special projects.

Human Services
6
Day One of Greater Altoona

To provide christian counseling and outreach to individuals and families.

Health
7
Clifton Community Food Pantry

To supply food to low income families

Food & Nutrition
8
Open Door Fellowship United Center

To meet corporately as a congregation and to meet the spiritual needs of our congregation

Religion
9
Alton Museum of History & Art Inc

Preservation and display of local history

Arts & Culture
10
The Alston House Inc

Homeless Housing

Health
11
Lord's Pantry of Leon County Inc

Provide food and necessities to those in need in leon county area

Food & Nutrition
12
Albion Community Gardens
Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hoyleton Youth and Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Crisis Food Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF CHRIST: $140,049 · OtherEVANGELICAL CHURCH OF CHRISTHITZ MEMORIAL HOME: $71,468 · OtherHITZ MEMORIAL HOMEOPERATION BLESSING: $60,000 · OtherOPERATION BLESSINGWM BEDELL ACHIEVEMENT & RESOURCE CENTER: $51,500 · OtherWM BEDELL ACHIEVEMENT & RESOURCE CENTERALTON SALVATION ARMY: $47,646 · OtherALTON SALVATION ARMYFATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS HOME: $47,646 · OtherFATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS HOMEST MARY'S SCHOOL: $36,500 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $29,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $28,500 · Other+29 more: $317,767 · Other+29 moreCRISIS FOOD CENTER INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesCRISIS FOOD CE…THE RESTORE NETWORK: $33,000 · Human ServicesTHE RESTORE NE…BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $17,300 · Human ServicesBEVERLY FARM F…HOYLETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $95,291 · EducationHOYLETON …BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALTON INC: $38,600 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY HOPE CENTER INC: $16,000 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF ALTON MAIN STREET: $2,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER ALTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $7,700 · Housing & ShelterALTON BAND AND ORCHESTRA BUILDERS: $6,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$830,576Human Services$145,300Education$95,291Youth Development$38,600Community Improvement$18,000Housing & Shelter$7,700Public Safety & Disaster$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOYLETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $95,291 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCRISIS FOOD CENTER INC: $95,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALTON INC: $38,600 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetTHE RESTORE NETWORK: $33,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetBEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION: $17,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOPE CENTER INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALTON BAND AND ORCHESTRA BUILDERS: $6,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ALTON MAIN STREET: $2,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOYLETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS FOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALTON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RESTORE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds BEVERLY FARM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOPE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ALTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED METHODIST VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALTON BAND AND ORCHESTRA BUILDERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Piasa Charitable FoundationIL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Piasa Charitable Foundation · Alton Woman's Home Association · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Alton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Alton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Alton Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Alton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph