Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Allison Lee Condit Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$122kHuman Services$9k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$251k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES$22,000
HOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY$1,000
SHARED ADVENTURES$1,000
SPECIAL PARENTS INFORMATION NETWORK$500
VISTA CENTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES: $22k → 8%WATCH RESOURCES INC: $15k → 14%LIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES: $17k → 8%WATCH RESOURCES INC: $15k → 14%LIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES: $5k → 8%WATCH RESOURCES INC: $10k → 14%LIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES: $5k → 8%WATCH RESOURCES INC: $5k → 14%LIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES: $5k → 8%WATCH RESOURCES INC: $5k → 14%LIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES: $1k → 8%SHARED ADVENTURES: $1k → 13%SHARED ADVENTURES: $1k → 13%SHARED ADVENTURES: $1k → 13%SHARED ADVENTURES: $1k → 13%SPECIAL PARENTS INFORMATION NETWORK: $400 → 13%SPECIAL PARENTS INFORMATION NETWORK: $250 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$126k · 8 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$126k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+28%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +54%
  • WR
    WATCH RESOURCES INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +8%
  • SA
    SHARED ADVENTURES
    7× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +195%

Funded once

  • DS
    DOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HOSPICE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • CS
    CABRILLO STROKE CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Serra Residential Center Inc

To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities

—
2
Silicon Valley Independent Living Center

SVILC builds disability identity, culture, pride, creating opportunities for personal and community transformation, and partnering with others to ensure that civil and human rights are protected.

Human Services
3
Developmental Services Continuum Inc

The mission is to provide support and services for children and adults with developmental disabilities.

—
4
Southern California Rehabilitation Services Inc

To operate community service centers to improve physical,social and financial conditions for the disabled and the elderly.

—
5
People with Disabilities Succeeding

Community support for Developmentally Disabled Adults, with a main emphasis on helping people to obtain and maintain real jobs in local businesses.

Employment
6
Living Well Disability Services

Living Well Disability Services transforms the lives of people impacted by disabilities through the delivery of exceptional services.

—
7
Life Steps Foundation Inc

To provide in-home community based services to the mentally, physically, or developmentally disabled

Human Services
8
Social Development Centers Inc dba Community Employment Services

SDC, Inc. is committed to providing personalized services, which promote the interest and respect the choices of each individual. Resources and other supports will be identified and utilized to effectively impact on developing, expanding…

Human Services
9
The Shared Living Collaborative Inc

To provide services and residential support to individuals with disabilities

Human Services
10
Senior Network Services Inc

Senior Network Services is a nonprofit agency providing senior citizens and persons with disabilities with information, guidance and assistance in coordinating existing resources to promote independence and the highest quality of life.

Human Services
11
San Andreas Regional Center

The center provides advocacy, assessment, information, and coordinated services that support individuals with developmental disabilities and their families in making informed choices and leading self-directed lives.

Human Services
12
Residential Services Inc

Residential Services, Inc. provides living options and related supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities of all ages.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Services; the most unlike its peers is The Living Breath Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesLIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES INCWATCH RESOURCES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesWATCH RESOURCES INCSHARED ADVENTURES: $6,500 · Human ServicesSHARED ADVENTURES+1 more: $2,650 · Human ServicesCABRILLO COLLEGE STROKE CENTER: $3,500 · OtherCABRILLO COL…VISTA CENTER: $3,500 · OtherVISTA CENTERTHE PINK FLAMINGO (SPINAL CORD SOCIETY): $2,000 · OtherTHE PINK FLA…DOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY: $1,500 · OtherDOWN SYNDROM…FRIENDS OF HOSPICE: $1,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF H…CABRILLO STROKE CENTER: $1,000 · OtherCABRILLO STR…HOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $1,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF S…SPECIAL NEEDS PARENTS INFORMATION NETWORK: $500 · OtherHOPE SERVICES: $2,500 · EmploymentSPINAL CORD SOCIETY: $500 · HealthTHE LIVING BREATH FOUNDATION: $200 · Philanthropy
Human Services$114,150Other$14,000Employment$2,500Health$500Philanthropy$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWATCH RESOURCES INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSHARED ADVENTURES: $6,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetSpecial Parents Information Network of Santa Cruz County: $2,650 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE SERVICES: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPINAL CORD SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIVING BREATH FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFE SERVICES ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds WATCH RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARED ADVENTURES ↗
  • Who funds Special Parents Information Network of Santa Cruz County ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SPINAL CORD SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE LIVING BREATH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Allison Lee Condit Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Allison Lee Condit Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Allison Lee Condit Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Allison Lee Condit Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Allison Lee Condit’s filings →

    More from the funding graph