Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Allerton Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$5.9MEnvironment$5.1MEducation$4.4MHealth$3.8MArts & Culture$750kHuman Services$90kYouth Development$40kPhilanthropy$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $235k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $765k
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.3M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$100M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CONSERVATION FUND$1,500,000
NATURAL LANDS$1,000,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION$500,000
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$250,000
JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE$200,000
PENNSYLVANIA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS$165,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$100,000
THE CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC$100,000
PENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS$50,000
THE SCHUYLKILL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION$50,000
MARINE MAMMAL STRANDING CENTER$50,000
PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART$50,000
WOODFORD CEDAR RUN WILDLIFE REFUGE$40,000
PROVIDENCE ANIMAL CENTER$25,000
PHILADELPHIA ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $790k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $200k → 10%JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $200k → 10%JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $150k → 10%JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $50k → 10%THE ELWYN FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%THE ELWYN FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $15k → 6%CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $15k → 6%CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $15k → 6%CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $15k → 6%CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $15k → 6%CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $15k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 31 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
5

Total granted

$18M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+15%

Still filing today

81%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +159%
  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +10%
  • NL
    Natural Lands Trust Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE
    one grant, 2023 · $1.5M
  • AB
    AMERICAN BENEFACTOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • BV
    BRANDYWINE VALLEY SPCA
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
2
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
3
Humane Pennsylvania Foundation

To encourage and motivate the making of gifts and donations by deed, will, or otherwise, for the advancement, promotion, extension, and maintenance of the various causes and objectives fostered by the humane pennsylvania.

Animals
4
Zoological Society of Philadelphia

At philadelphia zoo, our mission is to flourish as an urban oasis, where people and animals thrive, transformational memories are made, and our passion for conservation saves wildlife (see schedule o).guided by a three-year strategic plan,…

Animals
5
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
6
Humane Animal Rescue

We strive to provide all aspects of care to abandoned, neglected, and injured animals; reunite lost pets with their caregivers or seek new families for them; educate the community on humane care and interactions with all animals with the…

Animals
7
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
8
Partners for Animal Welfare Society

Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.

Animals
9
The Maryland Spca Inc

To improve the lives of pets and people in the community; to provide and promote education concerning the proper care of animals; to provide medical services, socialization, and enrichment to animals; (see schedule o for continuation)to…

Animals
10
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
11
Woodstock Farm Animal Sanctuary Inc

We seek to end animal agriculture by rescuing farmed animals, giving them lifelong care and sanctuary, and educating about the harms of animal farming.

Animals
12
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Schuylkill Center for Environmental Education; the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
20/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CONSERVATION FUND: $6,450,000 · OtherTHE CONSERVATION FUNDUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE: $1,500,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - SCHOOL OF VETERINAR…+11 more: $666,000 · Other+11 moreDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $2,939,500 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS: $200,000 · EducationPENNSYLVANIA ACAD…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $3,000,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HO…+1 more: $55,000 · HealthNatural Lands Trust Inc: $2,100,000 · EnvironmentNatural Lands…The Schuylkill Center For Environmental Education: $240,000 · EnvironmentThe Schuylkil…FRENCH AND PICKERING CREEKS CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $740,000 · AnimalsPennsylva…Marine Mammal Stranding Center: $220,000 · AnimalsMarine Ma…WOODFORD CEDAR RUN WILDLIFE REFUGE: $165,000 · AnimalsWOODFORD …PHILADELPHIA ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $125,000 · AnimalsPHILADELP…DELAWARE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $95,000 · AnimalsDELAWARE …TRI-STATE BIRD RESCUE AND RESEARCH INC: $90,000 · AnimalsTRI-STATE…AARK WILDLIFE REHABILITATION AND EDUCATION CENTER INC: $70,000 · Animals+4 more: $105,000 · Animals+4 moreJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $600,000 · Human ServicesTHE ELWYN FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Human ServicesCANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $90,000 · Human ServicesPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $300,000 · Arts & CultureWOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $150,000 · Arts & CultureCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN BENEFACTOR FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$8,616,000Education$3,139,500Health$3,055,000Environment$2,440,000Animals$1,610,000Human Services$790,000Arts & Culture$550,000Philanthropy$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $3,000,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $2,939,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNatural Lands Trust Inc: $2,100,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $740,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $600,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $300,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $250,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Schuylkill Center For Environmental Education: $240,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetMarine Mammal Stranding Center: $220,000 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS: $200,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWOODFORD CEDAR RUN WILDLIFE REFUGE: $165,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetWOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $150,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $125,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMain Line Animal Rescue Inc: $120,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetFRENCH AND PICKERING CREEKS CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $100,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ELWYN FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDELAWARE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $95,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $90,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetTRI-STATE BIRD RESCUE AND RESEARCH INC: $90,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetAARK WILDLIFE REHABILITATION AND EDUCATION CENTER INC: $70,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetTHE MORRIS ANIMAL REFUGE: $55,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetHOPE SPRINGS EQUESTRIAN THERAPY INC: $55,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetWOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLARGE ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INC: $25,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetSAMS HOPE: $25,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetRyerss Farm for Aged Equines: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBRANDYWINE VALLEY SPCA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Natural Lands Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ↗
  • Who funds JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds The Schuylkill Center For Environmental Education ↗
  • Who funds Marine Mammal Stranding Center ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds WOODFORD CEDAR RUN WILDLIFE REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds WOODMERE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Main Line Animal Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRENCH AND PICKERING CREEKS CONSERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ELWYN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds TRI-STATE BIRD RESCUE AND RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AARK WILDLIFE REHABILITATION AND EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MORRIS ANIMAL REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SPRINGS EQUESTRIAN THERAPY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds LARGE ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMS HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Ryerss Farm for Aged Equines ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BENEFACTOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRANDYWINE VALLEY SPCA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY19.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Chester County Community Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Vesta Fund · Quaker City Foundation · The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation · Banfield Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Allerton Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Allerton Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Marine Mammal Stranding Center: 10% of income from government
  • Tri-State Bird Rescue and Research Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Allerton Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Allerton Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Allerton’s filings →

More from the funding graph