Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Allen and Erica Josephs Charitable Foundation Tr Agreement

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$260k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Arts & Culture$417kEducation$276kHealth$134kPhilanthropy$104kInternational$23kReligion$5k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $137k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL MUSEUM$50,000
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION$50,000
THE LEFFEL SCHOOL$35,000
NYU$32,000
NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
SECOND STAGE THEATRE$25,000
MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE$20,000
MAKE-A-WISH HUDSON VALLEY$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE BASS MUSEUM INC$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$5,000
THE JEWISH EDUCATION PROJECT$5,000
WESTCHESTER DAY SCHOOL$1,800
STARDUST JEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%WESTCHESTER DAY SCHOOL: $2k → 9%MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE: $20k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE BASS MUSEUM INC: $5k → 15%BROTHERS FOR LIFE: $10k → 9%NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%WESTCHESTER JEWISH COUNCIL INC: $5k → 9%MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE: $15k → 17%NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%STARDUST JEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 9%NYU: $35k → 17%NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%MAKE-A-WISH HUDSON VALLEY: $5k → 9%NYU: $32k → 17%NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%THE LEFFEL SCHOOL: $45k → 9%NYU: $7k → 17%THE LEFFEL SCHOOL: $45k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $10k → 17%THE LEFFEL SCHOOL: $35k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5k → 17%THE LEFFEL SCHOOL: $35k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5k → 17%THE LEFFEL SCHOOL: $35k → 9%UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION: $50k → 17%UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION: $50k → 17%UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION: $4k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER: $3k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $3k → 17%THE JEWISH EDUCATION PROJECT: $5k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL MUSEUM: $50k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL MUSEUM: $50k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL MUSEUM: $50k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL MUSEUM: $50k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL MUSEUM: $50k → 17%SECOND STAGE THEATRE: $32k → 17%SECOND STAGE THEATRE: $25k → 17%SECOND STAGE THEATRE: $25k → 17%SECOND STAGE THEATRE: $20k → 17%SECOND STAGE THEATRE: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$920k · 8 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$920k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-12%
+9%

Still filing today

63%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyInternationalReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL MUSEUM
    5× · 2021–2025 · $250k
  • TL
    THE LEFFEL SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $195k
  • NH
    NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $125k · revenue -12%

Funded once

  • BF
    Brothers for Life
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -1%
  • WJ
    WESTCHESTER JEWISH COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +9%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
3
University of Judaism Foundation
4
The Jerusalem Connection
5
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
6
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
7
Jewish Life Foundation
8
The Gerson and Helene Finkelstein Burn Patient Foundation
Human Services
9
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
10
Friends of the Jewish Museum Berlin

To promote and financially support the activities of the jewish museum berlin and similar institutions whose mission is to pursue the study of the history and culture of german-speaking jewry.

Education
11
Sherit Isroel
12
The Jacob and Hilda Blaustein Foundation Inc

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westchester Jewish Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Second Stage Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL MUSEUM — $250,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL MUSEUMTHE LEFFEL SCHOOL — $195,000 · OtherTHE LEFFEL SCHOOLNYU — $74,000 · OtherNYU+4 more — $15,200 · OtherTHE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC — $117,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SECOND STAGE TH…MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST — $35,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF JEWISH HE…Brothers for Life — $10,000 · Arts & CultureBrothers for Life+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $125,000 · HealthNORTHWELL HEAL…+1 more — $1,000 · HealthUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $103,600 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWIS…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $20,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $3,000 · InternationalWESTCHESTER JEWISH COUNCIL INC — $5,000 · Religion
Other$534,200Arts & Culture$167,000Health$126,000Philanthropy$103,600International$23,000Religion$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC — $117,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $103,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBrothers for Life — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COUNCIL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARDUST JEWISH FERTILITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Allen and Erica Josephs Charitable Foundation Tr Agreement funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph