Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Allan D Sutton and Anita Sutton Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$131kHuman Services$27kFood & Nutrition$24kRecreation & Sports$3kHealth$3kYouth Development$3kEnvironment$2kInternational$965Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$455k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANNA JULIA COOPE SCHOOL$15,000
CITY HARVEST$6,000
Coastal Roots Farm$3,000
Work to Ride$3,000
Surfrider Foundation$2,250
Nakashima Foundation for Peace$965
Pelican Harbor Seabird Station$750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Nakashima Foundation for Peace: $965 → 6%Work to Ride: $3k → 22%Surfrider Foundation: $2k → 10%Coastal Roots Farm: $3k → 11%THE FELIX ORGANIZATION: $6k → 6%SYRACUSE UNIV: $12k → 14%HARLEM JUNIOR TENNIS EDUCATON PROGR: $3k → 17%CITY HARVEST: $10k → 20%Pelican Harbor Seabird Station: $750 → 15%MY FATHER'S HOUSE INC: $3k → 12%ANNA JULIA COOPE SCHOOL: $15k → 9%THE FELIX ORGANIZATION: $5k → 6%SYRACUSE UNIV: $11k → 14%CITY HARVEST: $6k → 20%ANNA JULIA COOPER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $10k → 9%THE FELIX ORGANIZATION: $5k → 6%SYRACUSE UNIV: $11k → 14%CITY HARVEST: $6k → 20%ANNA JULIA COOPER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $6k → 9%THE FELIX ORGANIZATION: $5k → 6%SYRACUSE UNIV: $11k → 14%ANNA JULIA COOPER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $6k → 9%THE FELIX ORGANIZATION: $5k → 6%SYRACUSE UNIV: $10k → 14%ANNA JULIA COOPER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $5k → 9%SYRACUSE UNIV: $10k → 14%ANNA JULIA COOPER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $5k → 9%SYRACUSE UNIV: $7k → 14%ANNA JULIA COOPER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $5k → 9%ANNA JULIA COOPER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $5k → 9%ANNA JULIA COOPER EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$178k · 4 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +251% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$178k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+251%
0%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionEnvironmentInternationalAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $71k · revenue +45%
  • AJ
    ANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +469%
  • FO
    FELIX ORGANIZATION - ADOPTEES FOR CHILDREN INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $27k · revenue +251%

Funded once

  • HJ
    HARLEM JUNIOR TENNIS EDUCATON PROGR
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • MF
    My Fathers House Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Jewish Family Services of Greenwich

Jewish family services of greenwich (jfs) is a nonprofit social service agency dedicated to strengthening individuals and families in fairfield and new london counties. jfs provides behavioral health counseling, food security programs,…

4
City Growers Inc

Through our original curriculum design that uses innovative growing spaces on rooftop farms, in school gardens, and public parks - city growers fosters a love of nature and encourages nyc youth to consider their place, agency, and future…

Food & Nutrition
5
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
6
Jewish Family Service

Mission: Inspired by their history and values, Jewish Family Service supports the needs of Jewish individuals and families, refugees and immigrants, and the broader community to achieve well-being, health, and stability. From food security…

Human Services
7
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
8
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
9
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
10
Food and Environment Reporting Network Inc

Fern seeks to make the food system more sustainable and equitable through powerful journalism and storytelling.

Food & Nutrition
11
Riverkeeper Inc

Protects and restores the hudson river from source to sea and safeguards drinking water supplies.

Environment
12
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Felix Organization - Adoptees for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is My Fathers House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $70,947 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL — $59,973 · EducationANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOLFELIX ORGANIZATION - ADOPTEES FOR CHILDREN INC — $26,565 · Recreation & SportsFELIX ORGANIZAT…CITY HARVEST INC — $21,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST…HARLEM JUNIOR TENNIS EDUCATON PROGR — $3,409 · OtherWORK TO RIDE INC — $3,000 · OtherCOASTAL ROOTS FARM — $3,000 · OtherMy Fathers House Inc — $3,000 · HealthTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $2,250 · EnvironmentNAKASHIMA FOUNDATION FOR PEACE — $965 · InternationalPELICAN HARBOR SEABIRD STATION INC — $750 · Animals
Education$130,920Recreation & Sports$26,565Food & Nutrition$21,000Other$9,409Health$3,000Environment$2,250International$965Animals$750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $70,947 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANNA JULIA COOPER SCHOOL — $59,973 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFELIX ORGANIZATION - ADOPTEES FOR CHILDREN INC — $26,565 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL ROOTS FARM — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMy Fathers House Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Allan D Sutton and Anita Sutton Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 18%
  • My Fathers House Inc18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Allan D Sutton and Anita Sutton Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Allan D Sutton and Anita Sutton Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph