Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Alfred a and Mary a Johnson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$143kHuman Services$33kPhilanthropy$20kAnimals$18kHealth$13kEducation$12kArts & Culture$5kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$277k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREEK ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESAN CATHEDERAL OF THE HOLY TRINITY$17,500
ARCHDIOCESAN CATHEDRAL PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETY$10,000
THE SOUP KITCHEN$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
211 PALM BEACH TREASURE COAST INC$1,500
BIG DOG RANCH FOUNDATION LLC$1,000
TOGETHER FOR CHILDREN ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $3k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $3k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$187k · 10 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$187k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+57%

Still filing today

60%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BD
    BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $13k · revenue +79%
  • SA
    SUFFIELD ACADEMY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +47%
  • TC
    TRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • SC
    ST CATHERINE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $14k
  • SM
    ST MICHAEL'S HOME FOR THE AGED
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • VN
    VISITING NURSE SERVICES OF NEW YORK
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bridgewater Home Inc

Assisted Living and Nursing Care

Human Services
2
Berkeley Retirement Home Inc

None

3
Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County Inc

None

Animals
4
Boca School for Autism Inc

A school for 5-22 year old students with developmental and learning challenges that provides a safe and dignified learning environment to explore and realize their true abilities and potential.

Education
5
Saint Andrew's School of Boca Raton Inc

Saint andrew's school is an independent school founded in the episcopal tradition. our mission is to build a community of learners, provide excellence in education, and nurture each student in mind, body, and spirit.

Education
6
Bridgewater Village Inc

Retirement housing

Housing & Shelter
7
Tompkins County Spca

The mission of the SPCA of Tompkins County is to protect companion animals. We are a no-kill shelter dedicated to preventing animal cruelty and overpopulation. We promote responsible pet stewardship by providing education, counseling and…

Animals
8
Cumberland Valley Animal Shelter Inc

Provide shelter for homeless animals and prevent animal cruelty

Animals
9
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
10
Berkeley County Spca

Care of abandoned and abused animals including spay, neuter, food, shots, lodging, care, pickup and adoption.

11
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
12
Suncoast Humane Societyinc

Our mission is to encourage, honor and support the human-animal bond in the suncoast region of florida. our vision is to celebrate a community whose pets are safe and loved. suncoast humane society provides sheltering, prevention and…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Suffield Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARCHBISHOP IAKOVOS LEADERSHIP 100 ENDOWMENT FUND INCORPORATED — $90,000 · OtherARCHBISHOP IAKOVOS LEADERSHIP 100 ENDOWMENT FUND INCORPORATEDARCHDIOCESAN CATHEDRAL PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETY — $23,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESAN CATHEDRAL PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETYARCHDIOCESAN CATHEDRAL PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIEITY — $19,342 · OtherARCHDIOCESAN CATHEDRAL PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIEITYGREEK ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESAN CATHEDERAL OF THE HOLY TRINITY — $17,500 · OtherGREEK ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESAN CATHEDERAL OF THE HOLY TRINITYST MICHAEL'S HOME INC — $15,000 · OtherST MICHAEL'S HOME INCST CATHERINE FOUNDATION — $13,500 · OtherST CATHERINE FOUNDATIONST MICHAEL'S HOME FOR THE AGED — $10,000 · Other+7 more — $26,000 · Other+7 moreBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC — $13,000 · AnimalsTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $3,200 · AnimalsSUFFIELD ACADEMY — $12,000 · EducationBelmont Child Care Association Inc — $7,000 · Human ServicesThe Soup Kitchen Inc — $4,000 · Food & NutritionBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC — $3,000 · Youth Development211 Palm BeachTreasure Coast Inc — $2,500 · Health
Other$214,342Animals$16,200Education$12,000Human Services$7,000Food & Nutrition$4,000Youth Development$3,000Health$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST MICHAEL'S HOME INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC — $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUFFIELD ACADEMY — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont Child Care Association Inc — $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Soup Kitchen Inc — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $3,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget211 Palm BeachTreasure Coast Inc — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST MICHAEL'S HOME INC
  • Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC
  • Who funds SUFFIELD ACADEMY
  • Who funds Belmont Child Care Association Inc
  • Who funds The Soup Kitchen Inc
  • Who funds TRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC
  • Who funds 211 Palm BeachTreasure Coast Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Alfred a and Mary a Johnson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 17%
  • 211 Palm BeachTreasure Coast Inc17% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph