How much did THE ALEX AND SALLY HALFF FAMILY grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of THE ALEX AND SALLY HALFF FAMILY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

arts education

2019

arts education

2020

arts education

2021

arts education

2022

—

2023

—

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

TEMPLE BETH EL$8,500
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$6,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO$5,000
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$5,000
BOYSVILLE INC$2,500
GOLD STAR TEEN ADVENTURES$2,500
RAPE CRISIS CENTER$2,500
FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC$2,100
CHILDSAFE$2,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$2,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTH FUND$2,000
AGARITA CHAMBER PLAYERS$1,500
HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL$1,500
CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL$1,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$481k · 25 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$481k

$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%

+25%

Still filing today

56%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthInternationalPhilanthropyCivil RightsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

JF
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO
8× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +49%
SA
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +12%
TF
TRANSPLANTS FOR CHILDREN
8× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +15%

Funded once

HC
HEMISFAIR CONSERVANCYgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +241%
CO
CAMPUS OF THE SAN ANTONIO JEWISH COMMUNITY
one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +7%
AA
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION
one grant, 2019 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Jewish Family Service of San Antonio Texas Inc

Provides professional clinical counseling for adults, children and families, including long term supportive treatment, brief therapy, and emergency treatment also short term financial assistance to San Antonio area residents who need help…

Human Services

Jewish Care System of San Antonio

Support the special needs of the jewish senior community in san antonio, texas.

Housing & Shelter

Jewish Community Federation of San

Grantmaking & programs to support education, services, & engagement in the jewish community

Philanthropy

Jewish Federation of El Paso and Las

Serving the jewish community by engaging, connecting, supporting and celebrating jewish life, values and culture in greater el paso, las cruces, israel and beyond.

—

San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture

Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—

Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services

Jewish Federation of Greater Houston

The Jewish Federation of Greater Houston mobilizes and activates initiatives and relationships to promote Houston's Jewish future through fund development and resource allocations, collaborative network initiatives, and community…

—

San Antonio Christian School

Provide students pre-k to 12th a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith & service.

—

Communities in Schools of San Antonio

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education

The Arc of San Antonio Inc

To improve the quality of life for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and those who care for them.

Health

Texans Care for Children Inc

Texas Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to life.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Campus of the San Antonio Jewish Community and the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/19

Grantees still filing

16/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$293,150Philanthropy$84,500Human Services$61,600Health$24,500International$16,000Civil Rights$15,000Education$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar · The Charity Ball Association Of · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Braverman Family Charitable Foundation · Genevieve & Ward Orsinger Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE ALEX AND SALLY HALFF FAMILY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: UNITED COMMUNITIES OF SAN ANTONIO.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 203411782 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on UNITED COMMUNITIES OF SAN ANTONIO, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Alex and Sally Halff Family?

Find your warmest path to The Alex and Sally Halff Family through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE ALEX AND SALLY HALFF FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Alex and Sally Halff Family?

More from the funding graph

THE ALEX AND SALLY HALFF FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Alex and Sally Halff Family?

More from the funding graph