Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Alden Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$25kYouth Development$13kEducation$12kHuman Services$11kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$6kInternational$4kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FOOD BANK$2,500
UNITED WAY$2,500
THE CENTER PROJECT$1,000
UNIV OF MISSOURI TIGER SCHOLARSHIP$1,000
VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER$1,000
MTPC$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
OLIVET CHRISTIAN CHURCH$500
TRUE NORTH WOMENS SHELTER$500
NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR$500
GRADE A PLUS$500
HOPE FOR TOMORROW$500
GRANNY'S HOUSE$500
BE THE CHANGE VOLUNTEERS$500
Individual grant recipient$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $500 → 8%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $500 → 8%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $500 → 8%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $500 → 8%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $500 → 8%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $500 → 8%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $250 → 8%CITY OF REFUGE: $1k → 17%CITY OF REFUGE: $750 → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS: $300 → 17%CITY OF REFUGE: $250 → 17%CITY OF REFUGE: $250 → 17%CITY OF REFUGE: $250 → 17%THE CENTER PROJECT: $1k → 17%THE CENTER PROJECT: $1k → 17%JOB POINT: $250 → 17%JOB POINT: $250 → 17%JOB POINT: $250 → 17%JOB POINT: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$94k · 22 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
8

Total granted

$94k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+147%

Still filing today

45%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationArts & CultureReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    Be The Change Vacations
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +16%
  • GA
    GRADE A PLUS INCORPORATED
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +621%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR TOMORROW INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • CC
    CARDLE CAREER ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Teach St Louis

Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…

Education
2
Carolina Collaborative Prep

Carolina collaborative prep (ccp) is a non-profit academic center that serves students in grades 3-12 with learning differences, empowering them to thrive in school and in life.

Education
3
Central Ozarks Private Industry Council

Central Ozarks Private Industry Council, Incorporated (COPIC) strives to provide all customers with access to professional, high-quality workforce development services, resulting in sustainable employment and contributing to positive…

Employment
4
World Affairs Council of St Louis

Education, non-partisan, membership organization that encourages people and organizations in the region to take an interest in, to learn more about, and to participate to a greater extent in global matters.

International
5
Coalition for Missouri Values

The coalition for missouri values seeks to bring members of our community together around a core set of values that undergird our society and community. together, we aim to gather information, educate and inform our fellow citizens and…

—
6
Central Missouri Community Action

To build relationships to empower people, strengthen resilience, and improve quality of life for all members of the community.

—
7
Main Street Corridor Development Corp Dba Midtown Kc Now

Work to suport commercial, mixed use, and residential progress and effective community, economic, and aesthetic development to create and encourage the renewal and vitality of Midtown Kansas City, Missouri.

Community Improvement
8
United Inner City Services Inc

Earlystart carries out its mission "building bridges. inspiring minds. impacting futures." through the earlystart child and family development centers. highly-trained faculty utilize a project-based curriculum in an arts-infused…

Human Services
9
Missouri Valley Community Action Agency

To engage communities and coordinate resources to improve the lives of people experiencing poverty.

—
10
St Louis Council of Construction Consumers

The slc3 is a community of design and construction industry professionals with a common interest in the betterment of our region through prioritizing innovation, continuing education, equity empowerment and all-inclusive workforce…

Community Improvement
11
Greater Ozarks Cooperating School Districts

To serve member districts by promoting collaboration of resources to ensure educational opportunites are maximized thus allowing member districts to focus on advancement of educational opportunities for students served at all educational…

Education
12
Vision for Children At Risk Inc

Strive to improve the well-being of children in the St. Louis region, especially those facing serious socio-economic risk, by providing information on well-being, building collaborative strategic action for promoting child well-being, and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Community Builders Community Development Co; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY: $24,750 · OtherUNITED WAYLOVE INC: $12,800 · OtherLOVE INCTHE FOOD BANK: $8,500 · OtherTHE FOOD BANKUNIV OF MISSOURI TIGER SCHOLARSHIP: $5,000 · OtherUNIV OF MISSOURI TIGER SCHOLARSHIPGRANNY'S HOUSE: $4,350 · OtherGRANNY'S HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · OtherTRUE NORTH WOMENS SHELTER: $3,350 · Other+15 more: $10,500 · Other+15 moreHOPE FOR TOMORROW INC: $3,250 · Human ServicesHOPE FOR T…CITY OF REFUGE: $2,500 · Human ServicesCITY OF RE…Mid-Missouri Center Project Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesMid-Missou…JOB POINT: $1,000 · Human ServicesJOB POINT+1 more: $300 · Human ServicesRAGTAG FILM SOCIETY: $4,500 · Arts & CultureBe The Change Vacations: $4,000 · InternationalMOBILITY WORLDWIDE: $250 · InternationalNora Stewart Early Learning Center: $2,350 · EducationCOLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,600 · EducationGRADE A PLUS INCORPORATED: $3,500 · ReligionVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$72,750Human Services$9,050Arts & Culture$4,500International$4,250Education$3,950Religion$3,500Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAGTAG FILM SOCIETY: $4,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBe The Change Vacations: $4,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGRADE A PLUS INCORPORATED: $3,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE FOR TOMORROW INC: $3,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNora Stewart Early Learning Center: $2,350 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMid-Missouri Center Project Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,600 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJOB POINT: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILITY WORLDWIDE: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAGTAG FILM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Be The Change Vacations ↗
  • Who funds GRADE A PLUS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR TOMORROW INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds Nora Stewart Early Learning Center ↗
  • Who funds Mid-Missouri Center Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOB POINT ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
  • Who funds MOBILITY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Veterans United FoundationMO25.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · Boone County Community Trust · Heart of Missouri United Way Inc · Boone Electric Community Trust · Community Foundation of Central Mo · Allen P and Josephine B Green · Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Alden Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Alden Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alden Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph