Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ainsley-Hicks Family Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2018
11
Grants FY2018
5
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Ainsley-Hicks Family Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year The Ainsley-Hicks Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $43k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
7
’18
4
’19
2
’20
1
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$628kArts & Culture$49kPublic Benefit$31kRecreation & Sports$30kCommunity Improvement$30kEducation$20kCrime & Legal$9kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2018 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k9 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SKATE JOURNEYS$10,000
AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNC$10,000
HOOVER INSTITUTION$5,000
LATIN AMERICAN CINEMATECA OF LOS AN$5,000
WATSONVILLE FILM FESTIVAL$5,000
STEVENSON SCHOOL$2,500
GIRLS INC OF THE CENTRAL COAST$2,000
CATO INSTITUTE$1,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$1,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$500
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ACOL: $9k → 6%CAMPBELL MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $8k → 8%MIIS-Center For Blue Economy Fund: $20k → 12%PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $500 → 12%LATIN AMERICAN CINEMATECA OF LOS AN: $5k → 14%MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $5k → 18%CATO INSTITUTE: $1k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 → 14%SKATE JOURNEYS: $10k → 9%AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNC: $10k → 7%CAMPBELL MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%THE CENTER FOR THE BLUE ECONOMY FUN: $10k → 12%SKATE JOURNEYS: $10k → 9%AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNC: $10k → 7%HOOVER INSTITUTION: $5k → 8%STEVENSON SCHOOL: $3k → 12%SKATE JOURNEYS: $10k → 9%AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNC: $10k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%STEVENSON SCHOOL: $3k → 12%PANETTA INSTITUTE: $1k → 12%GIRLS INC OF THE CENTRAL COAST: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MI
CA
CO
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$109k · 5 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2018, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$109k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+63%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Arts & CulturePublic BenefitEducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WATSONVILLE FILM FESTIVAL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $35k · revenue +289%
  • SJ
    Skate Journeys
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +122%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • MF
    MIIS-Center For Blue Economy Fund
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • MK
    MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +56%
  • RC
    RANCHO CIELO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Santa Catalina School

Santa catalina school exists to develop in each student a striving for excellence, a maturing awareness of moral and spiritual values, a sense of responsible purpose, and a determination to serve the world with courage, grace, and…

Education
4
Sage Hill School

We inspire in our students a love of knowledge and the ability to use that knowledge creatively, compassionately and courageously throughout their lives.sage hill school's commitment to academic excellence and our outstanding college…

Education
5
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
6
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
7
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
8
California Agricultural Leadership Found

To enhance the long-term viability of california agriculture through leadership development, which in turn benefits the people and communities that agriculture serves. we grow leaders who make a difference.

Food & Nutrition
9
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
10
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
American Society of Civil Engineers Inc

To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Robert Louis Stevenson School; the most unlike its peers is Mineral King Preservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
13/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $628,012 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCMIIS-Center For Blue Economy Fund: $20,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR THE BLUE ECONOMY FUN: $10,000 · OtherACOL: $8,500 · OtherLATIN AMERICAN CINEMATECA OF LOS AN: $5,000 · OtherWILLY SCHAEFFLER SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $3,000 · Other+2 more: $1,500 · OtherWATSONVILLE FILM FESTIVAL: $35,000 · Arts & CultureCAMPBELL MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $9,092 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL: $30,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $1,000 · Public BenefitSkate Journeys: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationMINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationRANCHO CIELO INC: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirls Incorporated of the Central Coast: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentPacific Legal Foundation: $500 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$628,012Other$48,000Arts & Culture$44,092Public Benefit$31,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Education$16,500Youth Development$4,000Crime & Legal$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $628,012 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWATSONVILLE FILM FESTIVAL: $35,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetSkate Journeys: $30,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetCAMPBELL MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $9,092 over 2y, 11% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGirls Incorporated of the Central Coast: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ainsley-Hicks Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ainsley-Hicks Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ainsley-Hicks Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ainsley-Hicks Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ainsley-Hicks Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph