Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY

MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $47,326 to it, the largest being CALIFORNIA HUMANITIES ($27,500). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$247k
Revenue FY2025
3
Funders on record
$47k
Grants received
$3.2M
Net assets
0/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%

Against its field

MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY is better cushioned than half of the 15,926 education nonprofits its size.

Months of reserve11.4mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15,926 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($159k) Expenses 100 ($69k) Net assets 100 ($251k)2020 Revenue 1383 ($2.2M) Expenses 244 ($169k) Net assets 910 ($2.3M)2021 Revenue 173 ($275k) Expenses 260 ($180k) Net assets 948 ($2.4M)2022 Revenue 143 ($227k) Expenses 272 ($188k) Net assets 964 ($2.4M)2023 Revenue 495 ($788k) Expenses 360 ($249k) Net assets 1179 ($3.0M)2024 Revenue 348 ($554k) Expenses 378 ($262k) Net assets 1295 ($3.2M)2025 Revenue 155 ($247k) Expenses 355 ($246k) Net assets 1296 ($3.2M)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (155)Expenses (355)Net assets (1296)Peer revenue range
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2021: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $5k → $28k.

From the IRS filings of MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 58% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

89% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY.

58%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2021 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

69% of MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY's grant income comes from California funders.

CA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
21
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY?
MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $47,326 to it, the largest being CALIFORNIA HUMANITIES ($27,500). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $47,326 in grants to MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY.
Who is the largest funder of MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY?
CALIFORNIA HUMANITIES is the largest funder on record, with $27,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MINERAL KING PRESERVATION SOCIETY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing