Skip to content
The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund

Higher Education, Research and Public Service.

$273M
Granted FY2025still arriving
891
Grants FY2025still arriving
36
States reached
$644k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$62MHealth$40MEducation$16MHuman Services$13MCommunity Improvement$2.4MEmployment$1.9MSocial Science$1.5MInternational$674kOther$0
02FY2025 · 891 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 891 grants below total $25,406,905, the rows itemized in this filing. The $273,316,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $247,909,095 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k267 grants · $1.9M
  • $10k–50k524 grants · $12M
  • $50k–250k91 grants · $8.2M
  • $250k+9 grants · $3.6M
$16,445
Median grant
36
States reached
$4.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW SCHOOLS FOR NEW ORLEANS$643,695
NEW SCHOOLS FOR NEW ORLEANS$563,091
TNTP INC$416,170
XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA$373,144
CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$339,668
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$331,106
PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER$327,936
BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$311,154
TNTP INC$303,466
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT FORT WORTH SCAMEL$209,163
UCHICAGO ARGONNE LLC DBA ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY$200,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH$193,793
FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH$186,594
NEW SCHOOLS FOR NEW ORLEANS$181,353
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA$180,128
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $141k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $45k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $107k → 14%TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $103k → 14%THE FAMILY TREE: $37k → 17%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $42k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $91k → 14%TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $81k → 14%THE FAMILY TREE: $34k → 17%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $42k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $82k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $41k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $77k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $39k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $77k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $39k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $77k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $39k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $77k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $39k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $77k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $39k → 24%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $39k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $59k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $39k → 24%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $39k → 24%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $39k → 24%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $39k → 24%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $38k → 24%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $38k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $41k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $38k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $41k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $37k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $41k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $37k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $39k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $36k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $36k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $35k → 24%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $34k → 24%IMA WORLD HEALTH: $34k → 14%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $34k → 24%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $34k → 24%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $34k → 24%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $34k → 24%WELLSPRING ALLIANCE OF FAMILIES: $34k → 24%XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $64k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$124M · 234 repeat orgs$8.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

234 repeat relationships: 122 still active in FY2025, 112 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

234
88

Total granted

$124M
$5.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+16%

Still filing today

54%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.1M · revenue +64%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +53%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER BATON ROUGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • SP
    SANOFI PASTEUR VAXDESIGN CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $406k
  • TT
    THE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $375k · revenue +108%
  • LS
    LC SCIENCES LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $348k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
7
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
8
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
9
University of Maryland Obstetrical Andgynecological Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Louisiana Public Health Institute; the most unlike its peers is Board of Regents of the University of Wi System Ozaukee Cty 4-H Livestock Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

195 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 195 of the 359 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
188/195
Grantees still filing
132/195
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ZALGEN LABS LLC: $5,755,946 · OtherZALGEN LABS LLCJOHN SEALY HOSPITALUTMB: $5,497,568 · OtherJOHN SEALY HOSPITALUTMBLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4,937,224 · OtherLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITYFAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER BATON ROUGE: $3,082,144 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $2,503,036 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $2,289,519 · Other+113 more: $42,685,206 · Other+113 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5,118,080 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYNEW SCHOOLS FOR NEW ORLEANS INC: $2,738,636 · EducationNEW SCHOOLS FOR NEW ORLEANS…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,718,751 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY …New York University: $2,567,486 · EducationNew York UniversityPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,837,838 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Ha…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,782,566 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TH…XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $1,781,349 · EducationXAVIER UNIVERSITYTNTP INC: $1,630,465 · EducationEmory University: $1,549,355 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine: $1,270,468 · Education+26 more: $10,053,712 · Education+26 moreCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $3,811,494 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITA…PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,150,060 · HealthPENNINGTON BIOMEDI…LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE: $1,618,520 · HealthLOUISIANA PUBLIC H…MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $1,524,578 · HealthMARY BIRD PERKINS …THE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $1,118,079 · HealthTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1,078,702 · HealthTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1,041,903 · HealthHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE: $979,792 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation: $859,200 · HealthOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $858,805 · Health+23 more: $6,475,870 · Health+23 moreTHE WELLSPRING ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES INC: $2,586,371 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY TREE INFORMATION EDUCATION AND COUNSELING CENTER IN: $2,297,283 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S BUREAU OF NEW ORLEANS: $2,220,260 · Human ServicesINTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC: $976,079 · Human ServicesBOAT PEOPLE S O S INC: $410,250 · Human ServicesTHE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $375,081 · Human ServicesPATH: $1,526,037 · InternationalMESOAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CORPORATION: $188,792 · InternationalTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $858,044 · Social ScienceInstitute of Women & Ethnic Studies: $570,922 · Social ScienceCHILDRENS COALITION FOR NORTHEAST LOUISIANA: $1,083,919 · Crime & LegalVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC: $102,721 · Crime & Legal
Other$66,750,643Education$33,048,706Health$21,517,003Human Services$8,865,324International$1,714,829Social Science$1,428,966Crime & Legal$1,186,640

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5,118,080 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $3,811,494 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER BATON ROUGE: $3,082,144 over 9y, 23% of budgetNEW SCHOOLS FOR NEW ORLEANS INC: $2,738,636 over 3y, 22% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,718,751 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WELLSPRING ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES INC: $2,586,371 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetNew York University: $2,567,486 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY TREE INFORMATION EDUCATION AND COUNSELING CENTER IN: $2,297,283 over 9y, 17% of budgetCHILDREN'S BUREAU OF NEW ORLEANS: $2,220,260 over 9y, 14% of budgetPENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,150,060 over 3y, 22% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,837,838 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,782,566 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $1,781,349 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTNTP INC: $1,630,465 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE: $1,618,520 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetEmory University: $1,549,355 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPATH: $1,526,037 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER: $1,524,578 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $1,270,468 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $1,118,079 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,092,274 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS COALITION FOR NORTHEAST LOUISIANA: $1,083,919 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $1,079,802 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1,078,702 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1,041,903 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $992,966 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE: $979,792 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC: $976,079 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetREACH UNIVERSITY: $972,419 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $958,937 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $859,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $858,805 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $858,044 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA: $740,155 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK: $712,436 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $705,191 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOAK CREST INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $654,794 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $623,321 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $599,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAssociation of Occupational and Environmental Clinics: $598,075 over 3y, 45% of budgetMERCY FAMILY CENTER: $591,066 over 5y, 11% of budgetInstitute of Women & Ethnic Studies: $570,922 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $512,625 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLSU HEALTH FOUNDATION NEW ORLEANS: $469,330 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER FOUNDATION: $468,594 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $460,401 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $460,193 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $419,231 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER BATON ROUGE ↗
  • Who funds NEW SCHOOLS FOR NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE WELLSPRING ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY TREE INFORMATION EDUCATION AND COUNSELING CENTER IN ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S BUREAU OF NEW ORLEANS ↗
  • Who funds PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TNTP INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds MARY BIRD PERKINS CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds THE PRAXIS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS COALITION FOR NORTHEAST LOUISIANA ↗
  • Who funds LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds INTERCHURCH MEDICAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater New Orlea…The Trustees of Colum…Foundation for Louisi…Johns Hopkins Univers…National Collegiate A…Emory UniversityAmerican Chemical Soc…Northwestern Universi…United Way of Southea…Trustees of Boston Un…Washington UniversityUniversity of Pittsbu…
The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA54.2× affinity35 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Foundation for Louisiana · Johns Hopkins University · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Emory University · American Chemical Society · Northwestern University · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · Trustees of Boston University · Washington University · University of Pittsburgh

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine: 100% of income from government
  • Interchurch Medical Assistance Inc: 76% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Pancare of Florida Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Escambia Community Clinics Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Trustees of Clark University: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 359 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Administrators of the Tulane Educational’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home