Skip to content
The Addie Foundation Uad 128011 at a glance

· Private foundation

The Addie Foundation Uad 128011

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$282k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$1.8M
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$25,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL MILL DOG RESCUE$75,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI$75,000
AHEINZ57 PET RESCUE AND TRANSPORT INC$32,000
STOP THE SUFFERING$25,000
ANIMAL RESCUE CORPS INC$25,000
RUFF START RESCUE INC$20,000
SHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE$10,000
WAYSIDE WAIFS INC$10,000
TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RUFF START RESCUE INC: $20k → 11%ANIMAL RESCUE CORPS INC: $25k → 14%AHEINZ57 PET RESCUE AND TRANSPORT INC: $32k → 5%WAYSIDE WAIFS INC: $10k → 15%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $75k → 21%ELMBROOK HUMANE SOCIETY: $94k → 5%SHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE: $10k → 10%PET MATCHMAKER RESCUE SOUTH: $30k → 17%NATIONAL MILL DOG RESCUE: $94k → 9%STOP THE SUFFERING: $25k → 15%TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 28%ANIMAL RESCUE CORPS INC: $25k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $50k → 21%ELMBROOK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $94k → 5%PET MATCHMAKER RESCUE SOUTH: $20k → 17%NATIONAL MILL DOG RESCUE: $94k → 9%TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 28%ANIMAL RESCUE CORPS INC: $25k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $50k → 21%ELMBROOK HUMANE SOCIETY: $94k → 5%PET MATCHMAKER RESCUE SOUTH: $13k → 17%NATIONAL MILL DOG RESCUE: $94k → 9%TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 28%ANIMAL RESCUE CORPS INC: $20k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $35k → 21%ELMBROOK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $94k → 5%THE PET MATCHMAKER RESCUE: $13k → 17%NATIONAL MILL DOG RESCUE: $94k → 9%TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY: $13k → 28%ANIMAL RESCUE CORPS INC: $13k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $24k → 21%ELMBROOK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $45k → 5%PET MATCHMAKER RESCUE SOUTH: $30k → 17%NATIONAL MILL DOG RESCUE: $94k → 9%TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY: $13k → 28%ANIMAL RESCUE CORPS INC: $13k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $24k → 21%ELMBROOK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $26k → 5%NATIONAL MILL DOG RESCUE: $75k → 9%TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY: $13k → 28%ANIMAL RESCUE CORPS INC: $13k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $24k → 21%NATIONAL MILL DOG RESCUE: $94k → 9%TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
IA
OH
CA
CO
MO
TN
DC
MS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 7 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$1.7M
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+14%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    National Mill Dog Rescue
    7× · 2019–2025 · $639k · revenue +80%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI
    7× · 2019–2025 · $282k · revenue +41%
  • AR
    Animal Rescue Corps Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $134k · revenue +159%

Funded once

  • AP
    AHEINZ57 PET RESCUE & TRANSPORT INC
    one grant, 2025 · $32k · revenue 0%
  • ST
    STOP THE SUFFERING RESCUE
    one grant, 2025 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • RS
    RUFF START RESCUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $20k · revenue +195%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Raskels Rescue
Animals
2
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
3
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
4
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
5
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
6
Tennessee River Rescues

we exist to spay and neuter unwanted pets in our local area trying to find them a home to thrive in until the end of their time

Animals
7
Muttsnstuff

Rescue animals

Animals
8
Rescue Coop
Animals
9
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals
10
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
11
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
12
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelter From the Storm Animal Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Mill Dog Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELMBROOK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $447,000 · AnimalsELMBROOK HUMANE SOCIETY INCHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $282,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURIAnimal Rescue Corps Inc: $134,000 · AnimalsAnimal Rescue Corps IncTunica Humane Society: $109,000 · AnimalsTunica Humane SocietyPETMATCHMAKER RESCUE SOUTH: $93,000 · AnimalsPETMATCHMAKER RESCUE SOUTH+4 more: $87,000 · Animals+4 moreNational Mill Dog Rescue: $639,000 · Recreation & SportsNational Mill Dog RescueTHE PET MATCHMAKER RESCUE: $26,000 · OtherSHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10,000 · Other
Animals$1,152,000Recreation & Sports$639,000Other$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNational Mill Dog Rescue: $639,000 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetELMBROOK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $447,000 over 6y, 9.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $282,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAnimal Rescue Corps Inc: $134,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetTunica Humane Society: $109,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetPETMATCHMAKER RESCUE SOUTH: $93,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetAHEINZ57 PET RESCUE & TRANSPORT INC: $32,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSTOP THE SUFFERING RESCUE: $25,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pedigree FoundationThe Pfizer Foundation…Petsmart Charities IncMcKesson Foundation I…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Blackbaud Giving …Shell USA Company Fou…Baird Foundation IncJpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…
Pedigree FoundationTN17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pedigree Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Petsmart Charities Inc · McKesson Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Addie Foundation Uad 128011 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Addie Foundation Uad 128011. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Addie Foundation Uad 128011’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home