· Private foundation
The Addie Foundation Uad 128011
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k7 grants · $132k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL MILL DOG RESCUE | $75,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI | $75,000 |
| AHEINZ57 PET RESCUE AND TRANSPORT INC | $32,000 |
| STOP THE SUFFERING | $25,000 |
| ANIMAL RESCUE CORPS INC | $25,000 |
| RUFF START RESCUE INC | $20,000 |
| SHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE | $10,000 |
| TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| WAYSIDE WAIFS INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNational Mill Dog Rescue7× · 2019–2025 · $639k · revenue +80%
- HSHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI7× · 2019–2025 · $282k · revenue +41%
- ARAnimal Rescue Corps Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $134k · revenue +159%
Funded once
- APAHEINZ57 PET RESCUE & TRANSPORT INCone grant, 2025 · $32k · revenue 0%
- STSTOP THE SUFFERING RESCUEone grant, 2025 · $25k · revenue 0%
- RSRUFF START RESCUE INCgraduatedone grant, 2025 · $20k · revenue +195%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
we exist to spay and neuter unwanted pets in our local area trying to find them a home to thrive in until the end of their time
Rescue animals
Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.
Animal Welfare
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelter From the Storm Animal Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Mill Dog Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds National Mill Dog Rescue ↗
- Who funds ELMBROOK HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds Animal Rescue Corps Inc ↗
- Who funds Tunica Humane Society ↗
- Who funds PETMATCHMAKER RESCUE SOUTH ↗
- Who funds AHEINZ57 PET RESCUE & TRANSPORT INC ↗
- Who funds STOP THE SUFFERING RESCUE ↗
- Who funds RUFF START RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds WAYSIDE WAIFS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pedigree Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Petsmart Charities Inc · McKesson Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Addie Foundation Uad 128011 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.