Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ada Lieb Goldstein Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$232kInternational$102kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kReligion$15kPhilanthropy$14kYouth Development$10kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER (DR POCHAPIN FUND)$20,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$15,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$15,000
THE HONEY FOUNDATION FOR ISRAEL$5,000
FRENCHMENS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JESPY HOUSE: $1k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CO
MD
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$256k · 12 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
19

Total granted

$256k
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+14%

Still filing today

33%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyMembership BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $40k · revenue +115%
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $27k · revenue +27%
  • FC
    FRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • NS
    NYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE UROLOGY DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue -51%
  • NM
    NYU MEDICAL CTR (POCHAPIN FUND)
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc

JMCPG is committed to providing compassionate, personalized care from the region's most trusted team of physicians and health care professionals. Across the Palm Beaches and the Treasure Coast of Florida, JMCPG practice locations offer…

Health
2
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
3
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
4
Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc

Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)

—
5
Jfmc Facilities Corporation

Jfmc facilities corporation's (faccorp) mission is to reduce operating costs for jewish communal agencies and day schools by lending expertise and achieving economies of scale that ensure more resources are available for direct service to…

Philanthropy
6
The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research

The feinstein institute for medical research ("the institute") is the research branch of northwell health ("northwell"). through its affiliation with northwell, the institute's mission is to bridge the gap between biomedical research and…

Health
7
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
8
Kaplan Family Foundation Inc

To support the greater miami jewish federation and other irc code section 501(c)(3) organizations. philanthropy, voluntarism and grantmaking programs.

Philanthropy
9
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
10
Miami Jewish Health Systems Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to solicit and invest contributions for the benefit of and support of the activities of miami jewish health systems, inc. and related affiliates.

Health
11
The Jewish Federation of Sarasota-Manatee Inc

To strengthen jewish life and identity in our community, provide for jewish people in need and promote support for israel.

Philanthropy
12
Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix

Serving and supporting a vibrant, enduring jewish community.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER (DR POCHAPIN FUND): $55,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER (DR POCHAPIN FUND)BADGE OF HONOR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherBADGE OF HONOR MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONFACES: $30,000 · OtherFACESNYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTERJUPITER MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 · OtherJUPITER MEDICAL CENTERNYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE UROLOGY DEPARTMENT: $15,000 · OtherNYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE UROLOGY DEPARTMENTCHABAD OF PALM BEACH: $11,800 · OtherHACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH INC: $10,000 · OtherNYU MEDICAL CTR (POCHAPIN FUND): $10,000 · OtherNYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE GASTROENTEROLGY: $10,000 · OtherTHIS IS MY FACE: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC: $10,000 · OtherNYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $10,000 · Other+10 more: $24,850 · Other+10 moreJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $85,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (K…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $12,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAG…Jupiter Medical Center Inc: $40,000 · HealthJupiter Me…FOREVER FROSTY FOUNDATION INC: $2,300 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $2,000 · HealthJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $27,100 · PhilanthropyJupiter Me…VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $10,000 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD C…FRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyFRENCHMANS…JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $1,800 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesJESPY HOUSE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS: $500 · Membership Benefit
Other$271,650International$97,000Health$44,300Philanthropy$41,400Human Services$6,000Membership Benefit$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $27,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJESPY HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC ↗
  • Who funds FRENCHMANS CREEK CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOREVER FROSTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds JESPY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ada Lieb Goldstein Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ada Lieb Goldstein Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Jespy House Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ada Lieb Goldstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph