Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Academy Place Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$322k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$655kHuman Services$375kYouth Development$294kArts & Culture$287kHealth$144kRecreation & Sports$77kEducation$66kAnimals$64kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $152k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$7,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$75,000
BROOKS MUSEUM$50,000
JACK MILLER CENTER$40,000
SAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART$35,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS-MEMPHIS$35,000
PEGGY ADAMS ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE$12,000
CHURCH HEALTH$10,000
SALVATION ARMY OF MEMPHIS$10,000
SEASON TO SHARE-PALM BEACH$10,000
SALVATION ARMY-WEST PALM BEACH$7,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS-PALM BEACH COUNTY$7,500
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION$5,000
SALVATION ARMY OF SAN DIEGO$5,000
CLINCA SAN LUCAS GRACIAS$5,000
SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HIGH RIDGE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $300 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
SD
PA
CA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 24 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
20

Total granted

$1.9M
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+35%

Still filing today

50%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART
    8× · 2017–2024 · $186k · revenue +99%
  • CH
    CHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $127k · revenue +54%
  • PA
    Peggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $56k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • TI
    The Independence Fund Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $32k · revenue +9%
  • F
    FOCUS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • VF
    VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue ×45
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
4
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
5
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
8
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
9
Reef Check Foundation

Leading Citizen scientists to promote stewardship of sustainable reef communities worldwide.

Environment
10
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
11
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
12
The Poptech Institute

Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas. founded in 1996 by bob metcalfe (inventor, ethernet) and john sculley (apple, pepsi), poptech originally provided a forum to critically…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is San Diego Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $655,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS-MEMPHIS: $265,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS-MEMPHISJACK MILLER CENTER: $140,000 · OtherJACK MILLER CENTERBROOKS MUSEUM: $100,000 · OtherBROOKS MUSEUMSEASON TO SHARE-PALM BEACH: $75,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF MEMPHIS: $73,000 · Other+27 more: $230,050 · Other+27 moreSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART: $185,740 · Arts & CultureSAN DIEGO …+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureCHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC: $127,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $7,500 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthPeggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc: $55,500 · AnimalsTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,300 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $38,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $15,000 · EducationFIRST BOOK: $2,000 · EducationThe Independence Fund Inc: $32,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTE: $2,500 · Public BenefitBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC: $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,538,050Arts & Culture$185,840Health$135,500Animals$58,800Education$55,500Public Benefit$34,500Youth Development$28,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART: $185,740 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC: $127,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPeggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc: $55,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $38,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Independence Fund Inc: $32,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC: $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LUKE SOCIETY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA INC: $2,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST BOOK: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SEDONA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CHEERS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetThe Friends of Jupiter Beach Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Peggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Independence Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE LUKE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MDRC ↗
  • Who funds Memphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FIRST BOOK ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SEDONA INC ↗
  • Who funds Florida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA PRESS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Academy Place Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Academy Place Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Academy Place’s filings →

More from the funding graph