Skip to content

· Private foundation

The 1912 Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$260kEducation$108kHuman Services$72kYouth Development$36kHousing & Shelter$30kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kArts & Culture$29kAnimals$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$890k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH$22,500
BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION$15,000
BLUEFIELD UNIVERSITY$14,000
Bluefield Arts & Revitalization Corp$10,000
Adult & Teen Challenge$6,000
WADE CENTER$6,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS SE WEST VIRGINIA$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
CONCORD UNIVERSITY$5,000
CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WV$3,000
MERCER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$3,000
PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA$2,500
Read Aloud West Virginia Inc$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS SE WEST VIRGINIA: $5k → 19%BLUEFIELD UNIVERSITY: $14k → 18%BLUEFIELD UNIVERSITY: $9k → 18%BLUEFIELD UNIVERSITY: $9k → 18%BLUEFIELD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 18%BLUEFIELD COLLEGE: $5k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS SE WEST VIRGINIA: $5k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS SE WEST VIRGINIA: $5k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS SE WEST VIRGINIA: $5k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS SE WEST VIRGINIA: $5k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS SE WEST VIRGINIA: $5k → 18%APPALACHIAN TEEN CHALLENGE: $6k → 21%CONCORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 21%CONCORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 21%CONCORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 21%CONCORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 21%CONCORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 21%CONCORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 21%CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $38k → 21%CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $33k → 21%CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $33k → 21%CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $23k → 21%CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $23k → 21%CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $23k → 21%BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION: $15k → 21%BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION: $15k → 21%BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION: $15k → 21%BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION: $15k → 21%BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION: $15k → 21%BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION: $15k → 21%BLUEFIELD STATE COLLEGE: $14k → 21%Bluefield Arts & Revitalization Corp: $10k → 21%CITY OF BLUEFIELD: $6k → 21%Bluefield Arts & Revitalization Corp: $6k → 21%WADE CENTER: $6k → 21%WADE CENTER: $6k → 21%WADE CENTER: $5k → 21%CITY OF BLUEFIELD: $5k → 21%CITY OF BLUEFIELD: $5k → 21%CITY OF BLUEFIELD: $5k → 21%CITY OF BLUEFIELD: $5k → 21%BLUEFIELD STATE COLLEGE: $5k → 21%BLUEFIELD STATE COLLEGE: $5k → 21%Adult & Teen Challenge: $6k → 21%Adult & Teen Challenge: $6k → 21%Adult & Teen Challenge: $6k → 21%Adult & Teen Challenge: $6k → 21%Adult & Teen Challenge: $6k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$611k · 21 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$611k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-20%
+18%

Still filing today

43%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthAnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BU
    BLUEFIELD UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $42k · revenue +5%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +3%
  • CT
    CHARLES T CHUCK MATHENA II co RICHARD L DAVIS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • AT
    APPALACHIAN TEEN CHALLENGE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Blue Grass Community Action Partnership Inc

Provide social services to a nine-county area of central kentucky.

Human Services
2
Blue Ridge Health Center Inc

Community health center

—
3
Children's Aid Society of Mercer County

To provide information, counseling, and such services as may be appropriate to families or others in raising and nuturing children.

—
4
Child Watch Counseling and Advocacy Center Inc

To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.

Crime & Legal
5
Chip of Virginia

Chip of virginia administers and monitors a network of 7 agencies in 27 virginia localities who work with low-income families to assure that children from birth to age 6 receive the health care necessary for them to lead healthy lives,…

—
6
HealthFirst Bluegrass Inc

Healthfirst provides outpatient primary healthcare, behavioral health and dental services to the underserved and uninsured residents of fayette county and surrounding counties in kentucky.

Health
7
Blanchard Valley Residential Services Inc

Blanchard valley residential services, inc. is dedicated to encouraging individuals with disabilities to reach their greatest potential while supporting quality, meaningful life choices and opportunities through person center approach in…

Human Services
8
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
9
Community Action Commission of Fayette County

Administers grants and contracts to help the lives of those individuals who fall below the poverty level.

—
10
Blue Valley Behavioral Health Inc

Blue valley behavioral health exists to provide quality behavioral health services to people of all ages within our communities, that promotes healthy and productive lives.

—
11
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
12
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bluefield Union Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $170,000 · OtherCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCHBLUEFIELD UNION MISSION INC: $90,000 · OtherBLUEFIELD UNION MISSION INCBLUEFIELD STATE COLLEGE: $34,000 · OtherBLUEFIELD STATE COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $31,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONCORD UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · OtherCONCORD UNIVERSITYAdult & Teen Challenge: $30,000 · OtherAdult & Teen ChallengeSALVATION ARMY: $30,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYAMERICAN RED CROSS SE WEST VIRGINIA: $30,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS SE WEST VIRGINIAWADE CENTER: $29,350 · OtherWADE CENTER+9 more: $25,000 · OtherBLUEFIELD UNIVERSITY: $42,000 · EducationCHARLES T CHUCK MATHENA II co RICHARD L DAVIS: $6,000 · EducationBLUEFIELD ARTS AND REVITALIZATION CORPORATION: $21,500 · Arts & CultureMERCER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $18,000 · AnimalsPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $15,000 · InternationalTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $13,000 · Human ServicesAPPALACHIAN TEEN CHALLENGE INC: $6,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,000 · Health
Other$499,650Education$48,000Arts & Culture$21,500Animals$18,000International$15,000Human Services$13,000Health$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLUEFIELD UNION MISSION INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetBLUEFIELD UNIVERSITY: $42,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBLUEFIELD ARTS AND REVITALIZATION CORPORATION: $21,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetMERCER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $18,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TEEN CHALLENGE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHARLES T CHUCK MATHENA II co RICHARD L DAVIS: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMERCER COUNTY OPPORTUNITY INDUSTRIES: $5,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGINIAS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREAD ALOUD WEST VIRGINIA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCLINCH VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLUEFIELD UNION MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUEFIELD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BLUEFIELD ARTS AND REVITALIZATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MERCER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN TEEN CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES T CHUCK MATHENA II co RICHARD L DAVIS ↗
  • Who funds MERCER COUNTY OPPORTUNITY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGINIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds READ ALOUD WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CLINCH VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

K B Tierney Charitable Foundation TrustWV20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: K B Tierney Charitable Foundation Trust · The Stelio and Betty Tracy Corte Charitable Foundation · The Pace Family Foundation Inc · Preservati Family Char Tr Fdn · The H P and Anne S Hunnicutt Foundation · Celanese Foundation · Jam Family Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The 1912 Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The 1912 Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The 1912 Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The 1912 Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 1912’s filings →

    More from the funding graph