· Private foundation
TGVZG Foundation
Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2017
- Under $10k66 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Chabad of Vancou Ver Island | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,005 |
| Bnos Chomesh | $9,000 |
| Associated Beth Rivkah Schools | $3,708 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Oholei Torah | $491 |
| Individual grant recipient | $419 |
| Friendship Circle | $410 |
| Individual grant recipient | $410 |
| Individual grant recipient | $398 |
| Oholei Torah | $384 |
| Chabad of Woodland Hills | $365 |
| Chabad of Woodland Hills | $360 |
| Oholei Torah | $360 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 40% of grant dollars ($34k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 60% that went abroad ($50k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $18) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Beyond the US — 60% of all-years giving ($50k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious School
publish religious books
Promoting study of Mishnah and other Jewish texts
Religious Teaching
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Translation of classic chassidic texts and the teachings of the Lubavitcher Rebbes,and the composition of works designed to make Judaism and Chassidism relevant to readers today.
Organized lectures, symposiums, attended conference, donations of books to libraries. To promote jewish education.
The furthurance of jewish concepts and religious beliefs.
To provide jewish religious training to students who are becoming acquainted with their heritage.
To support schools of religious studies.
Rav Chaims Kollelim Inc is the American fundraising arm of Matar Hashamim. Matar Hashamim is an established Israeli religious organization that has been maintaining religious centers for worship and Torah study and managing charitable…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vaad Hatmimim Haolami Inc and the most unlike its peers is Our Place Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASSOCIATED BETH RIVKA SCHOOL FOR GIRLS ↗
- Who funds Chayenu Inc ↗
- Who funds The Avner Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC ↗
- Who funds MAOR ↗
- Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗
- Who funds HADAR HATORAH RABBINICAL COLLEGE AND SUBSIDARY MACHON CHANA ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL TORAH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nash Charity Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Tgvzg18 Foundation · Goodness & Kindness Foundation · Eom - Freund Family Foundation · Barber Family Foundation · Lets Make It Happen Ny Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization TGVZG Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to TGVZG Foundation?
Find your warmest path to TGVZG Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.