Skip to content

· Private foundation

Texas Prairieland Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$96kArts & Culture$77kYouth Development$65kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kRecreation & Sports$51kHealth$35kHuman Services$11kReligion$6k
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$418k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALESMAN CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF OF DALLAS INC$16,000
ALBANY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$10,000
CAMP ABLE OF BUFFALO GAP$5,000
HIGHLAND PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION$3,500
ALBANY ACADEMIC AWARDS$1,500
THE OLD JAIL ART CENTER$1,500
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$1,500
ALBANY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,500
STEPPING STONES CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$1,500
CHURCH OF CHRIST - KEVIN RUFF MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP$1,000
CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER$1,000
SHACKELFORD COUNTY YOUTH & LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION$1,000
DOUG NEECE MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CAMP OZARK FOUNDATION$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SALESMAN CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF OF DALLAS INC: $16k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%SALESMAN CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF OF DALLAS INC: $16k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%SALESMAN CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF OF DALLAS INC: $13k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%SALESMAN CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF OF DALLAS INC: $9k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%SALESMAN CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF OF DALLAS INC: $4k → 14%SALESMAN CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF OF DALLAS INC: $4k → 14%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $1k → 13%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $500 → 13%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $500 → 13%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $500 → 13%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $500 → 13%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$433k · 31 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +114% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
3

Total granted

$433k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+114%
+39%

Still filing today

35%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc
    6× · 2019–2025 · $62k · revenue +114%
  • FG
    FORT GRIFFIN FANDANGLE ASSOC INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $53k · revenue +176%
  • HP
    HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +588%

Funded once

  • SI
    STATS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • FT
    FRONTIER TEXAS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -36%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Prairieland Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Texas Cowboy Hall of Fame Inc
Arts & Culture
3
Texas Trust Gives
Philanthropy
4
Texas Flying Legends Museum
—
5
Former Texas Rangers Foundation

To preserve, honor and perpetuate the living legacy of the texas rangers by celebrating their history and demonstrating the extraordinary qualities of character embodied by the rangers that have helped shape the state of texas and opened…

—
6
Alamo Trust Inc

The organization is to be operated exclusively to preserve and restore the alamo complex and to educate and inspire visitors on the history of all those who lived, fought, and died there.

Arts & Culture
7
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
8
Texas State Rifle Association Foundation Inc
—
9
12TH Armored Division Memorial Museum Foundation Inc

The primary mission of the 12th armored division memorial museum will be to serve as a display and teaching museum for the study of world war ii and its impact on the american people. the museum will accomplish its mission under the…

Arts & Culture
10
Greater Texas Foundation
Education
11
Texas Forestry Museum

To educate the public about forestry and preserve the history of the forestry industry.

Arts & Culture
12
Texas Bankers Foundation
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Frontier Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wounded Warrior Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALBANY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $60,500 · OtherALBANY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTCITY OF ALBANY: $42,900 · OtherCITY OF ALBANYCAMP JON MARC MYERS: $28,000 · OtherCAMP JON MARC MYERSOLD JAIL ART CENTER: $20,500 · OtherOLD JAIL ART CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $19,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $14,000 · OtherRESOURCE CARE: $12,500 · OtherCAMP ABLE OF BUFFALO GAP: $10,000 · OtherSTEPPING STONES CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $9,500 · Other+22 more: $57,550 · Other+22 moreFORT GRIFFIN FANDANGLE ASSOC INC: $53,000 · EducationFORT GRIFFIN FANDANGLE…HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $27,500 · EducationHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUC…ALBANY ACADEMIC AWARDS: $4,500 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationSalesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc: $61,750 · Human ServicesSalesmanship Club…Abilene Boys Ranch Inc: $4,000 · Human ServicesAbilene Boys Ranc…+2 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesCAMP OZARK FOUNDATION INC: $5,200 · Youth DevelopmentPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE FEED STORE: $3,500 · Food & NutritionFRONTIER TEXAS INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$275,100Education$87,500Human Services$68,750Youth Development$5,200Health$5,000Food & Nutrition$3,500Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSalesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc: $61,750 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFORT GRIFFIN FANDANGLE ASSOC INC: $53,000 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOLD JAIL ART CENTER: $20,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCAMP OZARK FOUNDATION INC: $5,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALBANY ACADEMIC AWARDS: $4,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetAbilene Boys Ranch Inc: $4,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FEED STORE: $3,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF FORT GRIFFIN: $2,500 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetFRONTIER TEXAS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc ↗
  • Who funds FORT GRIFFIN FANDANGLE ASSOC INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OLD JAIL ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CAMP OZARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBANY ACADEMIC AWARDS ↗
  • Who funds Abilene Boys Ranch Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FEED STORE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FORT GRIFFIN ↗
  • Who funds FRONTIER TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charles E Jacobs FoundationTX15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charles E Jacobs Foundation · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Texas Prairieland Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Texas Prairieland Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Texas Prairieland Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Texas Prairieland Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Texas Prairieland’s filings →

More from the funding graph