Skip to content

· Private foundation

Teresa & Albert Rotunno Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$133k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$400kEducation$105kReligion$88kHealth$74kHuman Services$44kFood & Nutrition$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC$50,000
THE CHURCH OF SAINT JOSEPH$14,000
HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE FOUNDATION$10,000
ST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$5,000
ANGELS OF LIGHT INC$5,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTIONST ANTHONY'S PARISH$5,000
THE MILLBROOK LIBRARY$5,000
CARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN$5,000
NORTH EAST COMMUNITY CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
OUR LADY OF LOURDES HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
STONEWOOD COMMUNITY PROJECT INC (DBA STONEWOOD FARM)$5,000
ST MARY'S SCHOOL$5,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $439k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $150k → 9%MILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $100k → 9%MILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $50k → 9%MILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $50k → 9%MILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $50k → 9%ANGELS OF LIGHT INC: $5k → 9%ANGELS OF LIGHT INC: $5k → 9%CARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 9%CARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 9%ANGELS OF LIGHT INC: $5k → 9%CARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 9%CARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 9%CARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 9%CARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$772k · 18 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$772k
$3k

Still filing today

39%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $400k · revenue ×14
  • CH
    CARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +32%
  • ML
    MILLBROOK LIBRARY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • IC
    IMMACULATE CONCEPTIONST ANTHONY'S PARISH - VINE & BRANCHES
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
2
Metropolitan Jewish Home Care Inc

Mjhs home care is a not-for-profit, certified home health agency (chha), committed to providing skilled nursing and rehabilitation services for individuals recuperating at home from an acute episode, often elderly and at-risk members of…

Health
3
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
4
St Lukes Home Residential Health Care Facility Inc

To establish and maintain, within the state of new york, a residential health care facility to provide care to the frail, elderly and other individuals requiring skilled nursing care and/or restorative rehabilitation. to carry educational…

Health
5
Mercy Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
6
Woodland Pond Inc

Woodland pond, inc. dba woodland pond at new paltz, was created to construct and operate a continuing care retirement community (the "ccrc") named woodland pond at new paltz, under article 46 of new york state public health law.the ccrc…

Housing & Shelter
7
Isabella Geriatric Center Inc

Operating as isabella center for rehabilitation and nursing care, isabella is a 705-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of the mjhs health system family. isabella is committed to providing exceptional short-term, sub-acute…

Human Services
8
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
9
Mjhs Hospice and Palliative Care Inc

To provide hospice services on both an inpatient and outpatient basis

Human Services
10
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
11
Northern Westchester Hospital Association

Northern westchester hospital association is an affiliate within northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care;…

Health
12
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeast Community Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $400,000 · Human ServicesMILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INCCARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN: $24,000 · Human ServicesCARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDRENANGELS OF LIGHT INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesOUR LADY OF LOURDES HIGH SCHOOL: $71,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF LOURDES HIGH SCHOOLST JOSEPH CHURCH: $44,000 · OtherST JOSEPH CHURCHWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $30,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGEIMMACULATE CONCEPTIONST ANTHONY'S PARISH: $28,250 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTIONST ANTHONY'S PARISHIndividual grant recipient: $24,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $22,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $15,500 · OtherST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCHSTONEWOOD COMMUNITY PROJECT INC (DBA STONEWOOD FARM): $15,500 · OtherSTONEWOOD COMMUNITY PROJECT INC (DBA STO…ST MARYS SCHOOL: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $18,500 · Other+4 moreMILLBROOK LIBRARY: $24,000 · EducationHudson Valley Hospice Foundation Inc: $20,000 · EducationRYAN MCELROY CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION: $12,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $6,000 · Health
Human Services$439,000Other$278,750Education$44,000Health$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $400,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetCARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILLBROOK LIBRARY: $24,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHudson Valley Hospice Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetANGELS OF LIGHT INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetRYAN MCELROY CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MILLBROOK LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds Hudson Valley Hospice Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS OF LIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds RYAN MCELROY CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley IncNY15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · The George Whalen Jr Fdtn Inc · Hathaway Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Teresa & Albert Rotunno Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Teresa & Albert Rotunno Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Teresa & Albert Rotunno Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Teresa & Albert Rotunno Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Teresa & Albert Rotunno Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph