Skip to content

· Public charity

Tennessee Chapter of Children's Advocacy

To promote, assist, and support the development, growth, and sustainability of child advocacy centers in their service to at-risk, abused, and neglected children and their families.

$3.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$457k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$6.8MHuman Services$3.1MArts & Culture$306kYouth Development$215kHousing & Shelter$47kPublic Benefit$28kReligion$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $93k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$103,006
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EXCHANGE CLUB-CARL PERKINS CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE$457,111
MEMPHIS CAC$441,851
NASHVILLE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$398,609
CHILDHELP CHILDREN'S CENTER OF EAST TENNESSEE$222,221
THE HOPE CENTER INC (10TH DISTRICT JUDICIAL CAC CLEVELAND CENTER)$165,215
SAFE HARBOR CAC INC$149,018
CAC OF RUTHERFORD COUNTY INC$147,477
UPPER CUMBERLAND CAC$135,949
CAC OF HAMILTON COUNTY$134,477
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CAC$131,068
CAC OF THE 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT$118,736
KID'S PLACE - A CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$118,504
THE CAC OF SULLIVAN COUNTY$105,579
CAC FOR THE 23RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT$103,006
12TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CAC$99,849
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KIDS FIRST CAC OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT: $126k → 10%CHILDHELP CHILDREN'S CENTER OF EAST TENNESSEE: $248k → 12%CAC OF HAMILTON COUNTY: $164k → 12%CAC OF ANDERSON COUNTY: $83k → 13%TIPTON COUNTY CAC: $10k → 14%EXCHANGE CLUB-CARL PERKINS CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE: $683k → 15%GIBSON COUNTY CAC: $10k → 15%CARROLL COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER: $10k → 16%COFFEE COUNTY CAC: $78k → 17%HENDERSON COUNTY CAC: $10k → 17%CAC FOR THE 3RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC: $141k → 17%WEAKLEY COUNTY CAC: $10k → 18%UPPER CUMBERLAND CAC: $163k → 19%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $81k → 22%KIDS FIRST CAC OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT: $96k → 10%CHILDHELP CHILDREN'S CENTER OF EAST TENNESSEE: $222k → 12%CAC OF HAMILTON COUNTY: $134k → 12%CAC OF ANDERSON COUNTY: $56k → 13%TIPTON COUNTY CAC: $9k → 14%EXCHANGE CLUB-CARL PERKINS CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE: $457k → 15%GIBSON COUNTY CAC: $9k → 15%CARROLL COUNTY CAC: $9k → 16%COFFEE COUNTY CAC: $48k → 17%HENDERSON COUNTY CAC: $9k → 17%CAC FOR THE 3RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC: $96k → 17%WEAKLEY COUNTY CAC: $9k → 18%UPPER CUMBERLAND CAC: $136k → 19%CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $36k → 22%KIDS FIRST CAC 9TH JUDICIAL DISTRIC: $9k → 10%CHILDHELP CHILDREN'S CENTER OF EAST TENNESSEE: $82k → 12%CAC OF HAMILTON COUNTY: $56k → 12%CAC OF ANDERSON COUNTY: $33k → 13%KIDS FIRST CAC: $11k → 14%MADSION COUNTY CAC: $10k → 15%COFFEE COUNTY CAC: $37k → 17%CAC FOR THE 3RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC: $51k → 17%UPPER CUMBERLAND CAC: $56k → 19%CHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $12k → 22%CHILDHELP CHILDREN'S CENTER OF EAST: $9k → 12%CAC ANDERSON COUNTY: $10k → 13%CAC HAMILTON COUNTY: $12k → 14%MADISON COUNTY CAC: $9k → 15%COFFEE COUNTY CAC: $31k → 17%UPPER CUMBERLAND CAC: $10k → 19%CHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $10k → 22%CAC HAMILTON COUNTY: $12k → 14%COFFEE COUNTY CAC: $14k → 17%COFFEE COUNTY CAC: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 31 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
21

Total granted

$10M
$186k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+82%

Still filing today

84%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Crime & LegalHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    Exchange Club - Carl Perkins Center for the Prevention of Child Abuse Inc
    6× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +34%
  • MEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
    7× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +52%
  • TV
    THE VICTOR S JOHNSON III NASHVILLE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $744k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HOPE CENTER INC - CLEVELAN
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
  • TH
    THE HOPE CENTER - ATHENS
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
  • CO
    CAC OF RUTHERFORD COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Advocacy Center of Ottawa Countyinc

Providing advocacy services for child abuse victims.

Crime & Legal
2
Children's Advocacy Center of Comal Coun

To provide a neutral, child-friendly agency community that facilitates a multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, detection, investigation, and treatment of child abuse.

Crime & Legal
3
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
4
Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center, Inc. will provide services to child victims of physical and sexual abuse, severely neglected children and children who have witnessed a violent crime. The Center will work every day to try and stop…

Human Services
5
Casa of Tipton County

Child Advocacy Services

Crime & Legal
6
Talladega County Child Advocacy Center Inc

Interview facility for child abuse victims.

Human Services
7
Children's Justice& Advocacy Center

To provide children who have experienced sexual or physical abuse a coordinated community approach to investigation, prosecution, treatment, and advocacy that promotes their safety, healing, and well-being.

Crime & Legal
8
Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center

Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.

Crime & Legal
9
The Childrens House

To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.

—
10
Child and Youth Advocacy Center

To operate a comprehensive child youth focused program based in a facility that allows law enforcement, child protection, mental health education professionals, prosecutors, medical and support services to work together to handle child…

Human Services
11
Child Advocacy Center of Cullman Inc

Nurturing hope, encouraging health, and promoting healing in troubled families through community collaboration, communication and cooperation

Human Services
12
Citrus County Children's Advocacy Center Inc

Coordinating agency for abused children

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Child Advocacy Center of the 9TH Judicial District Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ashleys Place-Sumner Child Advocacy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
27/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,094,194 · Crime & LegalMEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERTHE VICTOR S JOHNSON III NASHVILLE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $743,551 · Crime & LegalTHE VICTOR S JOHNSON III NASHVILLE CHILDREN'S ALLIANC…CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC: $351,403 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DIST…SAFE HARBOR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $339,405 · Crime & LegalSAFE HARBOR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INCCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SULLIVAN COUNTY: $312,549 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SULLIVAN COUNTYKIDS PLACE A CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $302,419 · Crime & LegalKIDS PLACE A CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERWILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $267,579 · Crime & LegalWILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INCChild Advocacy Center of the 23rd Judicial District: $266,640 · Crime & LegalChild Advocacy Center of the 23rd Judicial DistrictFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $262,376 · Crime & LegalASHLEYS PLACE-SUMNER CHILD ADVOCACY: $231,776 · Crime & LegalBLOUNT COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $231,575 · Crime & LegalJUNIORS HOUSE INC: $226,348 · Crime & LegalROBERTSON COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CEN: $179,109 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER 31ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC: $171,845 · Crime & LegalExchange Club - Carl Perkins Center for the Prevention of Child Abuse Inc: $1,340,103 · Human ServicesExchange Club - Carl Perkins Center for …CHILDHELP INC: $584,470 · Human ServicesCHILDHELP INCUPPER CUMBERLAND CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $388,626 · Human ServicesUPPER CUMBERLAND CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERTHE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF HAMILTON COUNTY INC: $388,069 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF HAMILT…Child Advocacy Center: $290,825 · Human ServicesChild Advocacy CenterTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC: $251,043 · Human ServicesTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE 9TH JUD…COFFEE COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $226,929 · Human ServicesCOFFEE COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER…THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF ANDERSON CO TN: $198,603 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLAND: $150,374 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY COUNTY CAC: $318,184 · Other12TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CAC: $193,068 · Other+24 more: $243,614 · OtherTHE HEALTH OPPORTUNITY PROTECTION & ENCOURAGEMENT CENTER INC: $426,864 · Housing & ShelterCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF RUTHERFORD COUNTY INC: $380,073 · HealthCAMPBELL COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER: $207,664 · Youth Development
Crime & Legal$4,980,769Human Services$3,819,042Other$754,866Housing & Shelter$426,864Health$380,073Youth Development$207,664

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetExchange Club - Carl Perkins Center for the Prevention of Child Abuse Inc: $1,340,103 over 6y, 12% of budgetMEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,094,194 over 7y, 16% of budgetTHE VICTOR S JOHNSON III NASHVILLE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC: $743,551 over 5y, 21% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $584,470 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HEALTH OPPORTUNITY PROTECTION & ENCOURAGEMENT CENTER INC: $426,864 over 6y, 17% of budgetUPPER CUMBERLAND CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $388,626 over 7y, 32% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF HAMILTON COUNTY INC: $388,069 over 6y, 12% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF RUTHERFORD COUNTY INC: $380,073 over 6y, 18% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC: $351,403 over 7y, 32% of budgetSAFE HARBOR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $339,405 over 3y, 15% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SULLIVAN COUNTY: $312,549 over 5y, 21% of budgetKIDS PLACE A CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $302,419 over 6y, 14% of budgetChild Advocacy Center: $290,825 over 4y, 44% of budgetWILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $267,579 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetChild Advocacy Center of the 23rd Judicial District: $266,640 over 6y, 14% of budgetFIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $262,376 over 4y, 40% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC: $251,043 over 5y, 15% of budgetASHLEYS PLACE-SUMNER CHILD ADVOCACY: $231,776 over 3y, 29% of budgetBLOUNT COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $231,575 over 6y, 7.9% of budgetCOFFEE COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $226,929 over 7y, 23% of budgetJUNIORS HOUSE INC: $226,348 over 5y, 15% of budgetCAMPBELL COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER: $207,664 over 5y, 13% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF ANDERSON CO TN: $198,603 over 6y, 25% of budgetROBERTSON COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CEN: $179,109 over 7y, 35% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER 31ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC: $171,845 over 6y, 25% of budgetCHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLAND: $150,374 over 5y, 11% of budgetNATIONAL CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $5,390 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Exchange Club - Carl Perkins Center for the Prevention of Child Abuse Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE VICTOR S JOHNSON III NASHVILLE CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALTH OPPORTUNITY PROTECTION & ENCOURAGEMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPER CUMBERLAND CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF HAMILTON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF RUTHERFORD COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SULLIVAN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds KIDS PLACE A CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Child Advocacy Center ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Child Advocacy Center of the 23rd Judicial District ↗
  • Who funds FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE 9TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHLEYS PLACE-SUMNER CHILD ADVOCACY ↗
  • Who funds BLOUNT COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COFFEE COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIORS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMPBELL COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF ANDERSON CO TN ↗
  • Who funds ROBERTSON COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CEN ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER 31ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS CENTER OF THE CUMBERLAND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Children's Alliance IncDC29.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Children's Alliance Inc · The Healing Trust Formerly Baptist Healing Hospital Trust · Elgin Children's Foundation Inc · East Tennessee Foundation · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tennessee Chapter of Children's Advocacy funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tennessee Chapter of Children's Advocacy. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tennessee Chapter of Children's Advocacy?

    Find your warmest path to Tennessee Chapter of Children's Advocacy through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tennessee Chapter of Children's Advocacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph