· Public charity
Temicha Support Line Inc
To assist children and families with emotional and financial difficulties, by providing aba services, and emergency relief.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONGREGATION AHAVAS YISROEL | $13,000 |
| CONG SDEI YAKOV DSHIKON SQUARE | $12,000 |
| CONG BAIS ROCHEL OF MONSEY | $8,000 |
| THE OJC FUND | $7,000 |
| CONG KEHILAS BELZ | $7,000 |
| MATBIA | $7,000 |
| YAD LTALMID INC | $6,000 |
| M AND S KOLLEL | $6,000 |
| AHAVAS CHAVERIM GEMILAS CHASUDIM IN | $6,000 |
| CONGREGATION KOLLEL BETH SHMYEL ARO | $5,400 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 23% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Lodz Charitable Trust · Breuer Charitable Foundation Inc · Ani Mamin Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Temicha Support Line Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Temicha Support Line Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Temicha Support Line’s filings →