· Private foundation
Breuer Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $87k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Congregation Ramat Daled | $36,000 |
| GLOBAL CENTER OF SKVER | $18,000 |
| CONGREGATION NESIVOS | $12,360 |
| MATBIA CHARITIES | $10,465 |
| Sheiris l'pinchos haolami | $10,000 |
| CONGREGATION YESHIVA AVIR YAKOV | $7,200 |
| Orchos Chaim | $5,000 |
| KAHAL BARDITCHEV | $4,000 |
| M&S Kollel Grocery Inc | $2,750 |
| MERKAZ HAKOLILIM SHIKUN SQUARE | $2,600 |
| CHELKAINY IMUHEM INC | $2,400 |
| Dina Morechin Jacobs Gemilas Chesed Fund | $2,050 |
| Congregation Yisroel Kedoshim | $1,400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| MOSDOS CHASIDEI SQUARE TYY OF WILLIAMSBURG | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGLOBAL CENTER OF SKVER6× · 2020–2025 · $116k
- CYCONGREGATION YESHIVA AVIR YAKOV5× · 2021–2025 · $67k
- SHSHEKEL HAKODESH5× · 2017–2024 · $65k
Funded once
- CZCONGREAGATION ZEMACH DAVID OF WILLIAMSBURG INCone grant, 2024 · $55k
- MJMERKAZ JERUSALEMone grant, 2021 · $36k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We promote and spread the religious teachings and philosophies of the holy Baal Shem Tov from Poland, who is regarded as the founder of Hasidic Judaism We provide financial assistance to Bais Vaad Lechachomim, a not for profit organization…
Promulgation and dissemination of Jewish customs, values and ideals to enhance the observance and traditions of Jewish orthodoxy.
To spread the philosophies of the holy Rabbi Jacob Joseph Twersky from Square Ukraine by printing his philosophies and lectures for the public. The organization also provides assistance to religious schools and religious non-profit…
To aid the poor and beedy with food, clothing abd spiritual gudiance
Religious Teaching
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
Assistance to the indigent
To promote religious study worldwide; to provide financial assistance to other religious, educational, and charitable organizations as well as to needy individuals.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yad Lyisroel Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lodz Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Lodz Charitable Trust · The Gds Foundation · Ani Mamin Foundation · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Mezritch Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Cco Services · Masmudei Talent Group Inc · Vyazreim Inc · Chayim V Chesed · Schonfeld Tzodoko Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Breuer Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.