Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Temicha Support Line Inc

To assist children and families with emotional and financial difficulties, by providing aba services, and emergency relief.

$141k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of TEMICHA SUPPORT LINE INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $77,400 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $141,085 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $63,685 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION AHAVAS YISROEL$13,000
CONG SDEI YAKOV DSHIKON SQUARE$12,000
CONG BAIS ROCHEL OF MONSEY$8,000
CONG KEHILAS BELZ$7,000
THE OJC FUND$7,000
MATBIA$7,000
M AND S KOLLEL$6,000
YAD LTALMID INC$6,000
AHAVAS CHAVERIM GEMILAS CHASUDIM IN$6,000
CONGREGATION KOLLEL BETH SHMYEL ARO$5,400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 23% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%TIFERES SHMIEL ALEXANDER MONSEY: $12k → 14%YAD LACHMU ANYU LENITZRUCHIN: $6k → 20%CONG BELZ SHTIBEL: $11k → 14%CONGREGATION KOLLEL BETH SHMYEL ARO: $5k → 20%CONG BAIS ROCHEL OF MONSEY: $8k → 14%CONGREGATION KOLLEL SANZ KLAUSENBUC: $7k → 20%CONG KEREN EZRA INC: $7k → 14%THE OJC FUND: $7k → 20%CONG KEHILAS BELZ: $7k → 14%MATBIA: $7k → 20%CONG OHEL YEHOSHUA OF BELZ: $6k → 14%AHAVAS CHAVERIM GEMILAS CHASUDIM IN: $6k → 14%CONGREGATION AHAVAS YISROEL: $13k → 14%CONG SDEI YAKOV DSHIKON SQUARE: $12k → 14%YIETZ VEZER: $10k → 14%M AND S KOLLEL: $6k → 14%YAD LTALMID INC: $6k → 14%CONGREGATION ZICHRON YOCHONON INC: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONGREGATION AHAVAS YISROEL — $13,000 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS YISROELCONG TIFERES SHMIEL ALEKSANDER MONSEY — $12,000 · OtherCONG TIFERES SHMIEL ALEKSANDER MONSEYCONGREGATION SDEI YAAKOV DSHIKON SQUARE — $12,000 · OtherCONGREGATION SDEI YAAKOV DSHIKON SQUARECONG BELZ SHTIBEL — $11,000 · OtherCONG BELZ SHTIBELCONGREGATION BETH ROCHEL OF MONSEY — $8,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ROCHEL OF MONSEYCONGREGATION KEHILAS BELZ MONSEY — $7,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KEHILAS BELZ MONSEYKEREN EZRA — $7,000 · OtherKEREN EZRACONG KOLLEL SANZ KLAUSENBURG INC — $7,000 · OtherCONG KOLLEL SANZ KLAUSENBURG INCCONG OHEL YEHOSHUA OF BELZ — $6,000 · OtherCONG OHEL YEHOSHUA OF BELZYAD LACHMU ANYU LENITZRUCHIN CHOQ LYISROEL — $6,000 · OtherYAD LACHMU ANYU LENITZRUCHIN CHOQ LYISROELAHAVAS CHAVERIM GEMILAS CHESED INC — $6,000 · OtherAHAVAS CHAVERIM GEMILAS CHESED INCCONGREGATION ZICHRON YOCHANAN INC — $5,700 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRON YOCHANAN INCCONGREGATION KOLLEL BETH SHMYEL ARON — $5,400 · OtherYIETZ VEZER INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE OJC FUND — $7,000 · EducationMATBIA CHARITIES INC — $7,000 · PhilanthropyM & S KOLEL GROCERY — $6,000 · Food & NutritionYAD LTALMID INC — $6,000 · Religion
Other$106,100Community Improvement$10,000Education$7,000Philanthropy$7,000Food & Nutrition$6,000Religion$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYIETZ VEZER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE OJC FUND — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YIETZ VEZER INC
  • Who funds THE OJC FUND
  • Who funds MATBIA CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds M & S KOLEL GROCERY
  • Who funds YAD LTALMID INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY29.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Lodz Charitable Trust · Breuer Charitable Foundation Inc · Ani Mamin Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Temicha Support Line Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph