Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ted Slavin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$316k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Human Services$355kHealth$266kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kCrime & Legal$50kFood & Nutrition$50kReligion$25kInternational$5k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $75
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $211k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT$60,000
HOMELESS PRENATAL PROGRAM$50,525
ACTA NON VERBA$50,000
THE LAST MILE$50,000
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$40,000
NORTH BEACH CITIZENS$40,000
THE SHALOM INSTITUTE$25,000
CEDARS-SINAI$75
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $270k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $60k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $60k → 17%NORTH BEACH CITIZENS: $40k → 10%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $50k → 17%NORTH BEACH CITIZENS: $35k → 10%NORTH BEACH CITIZENS: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Ted Slavin Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 78% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 71%.

Ted Slavin Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$531k · 4 repeat orgs$275k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$531k
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+74%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Homeless Prenatal Program Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $161k · revenue +2%
  • VENICE FAMILY CLINIC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +16%
  • NB
    NORTH BEACH CITIZENS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2023 · $55k
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA AND SONOMA COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing, rehabilitation and assisted living services without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to ensure both…

Health
2
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
3
Chelsea Jewish Community Inc

The organization's mission is to provide the highest level of home health and hospice care services without regard of an individual's ability to pay.

Health
4
Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles

Jfsla's mission is to provide life-improving services that help the people of los angeles live with dignity and exercise self-determination. we believe in and strive for a more compassionate los angeles where no one has to navigate life…

Human Services
5
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
6
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
8
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
9
The New York Gracie Square Hospital Inc

Our mission is to provide the highest-quality, state-of-the-art mental health and chemical dependency treatment in a warm, healing environment. our caring, compassionate team prepares our patients to return to their families and…

Health
10
Jewish Nursing Home of Western Massachusetts Inc

To care for the frail, elderly and infirmed according to jewish traditions.

Human Services
11
Bernal Heights Neighborhood Center

BHNC focuses on the needs of people with low and moderate incomes. We work to accomplish our mission by: (1) developing affordable housing throughout San Francisco; (2) providing linguistically and culturally responsive services to our…

Human Services
12
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Street Settlement; the most unlike its peers is Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $170,000 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET SETTLEMENTNORTH BEACH CITIZENS: $100,000 · Human ServicesNORTH BEACH CITIZENSHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $160,525 · HealthHomeless Prenatal Program IncVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $100,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINIC+1 more: $75 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $55,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF…LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME: $50,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES JEWISH H…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA AND SONOMA COUNTY: $25,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVIC…NANCY AND STEVEN GRAND FAMILY HOUSE: $10,000 · OtherNANCY AND STEVEN GRA…Beit T'Shuvah: $5,000 · OtherACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentACTA NON V…SHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHALOM INS…TURN 2 U INC dba THE LAST MILE: $50,000 · Crime & LegalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5,000 · International
Human Services$270,000Health$260,600Other$145,000Youth Development$75,000Crime & Legal$50,000International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $170,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $160,525 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH BEACH CITIZENS: $100,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetTURN 2 U INC dba THE LAST MILE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP & CONFERENCE CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ted Slavin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ted Slavin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ted Slavin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph