Skip to content
Technical Assistance Partnership of Arizona at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Technical Assistance Partnership of Arizona

To support organizations, activities, projects and strategies that strengthen community-based health services and better health outcomes for arizona's most underserved populations.

$349k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.1MHuman Services$802kEducation$336kCrime & Legal$326kEmployment$275kScience & Tech$183kPhilanthropy$84kCommunity Improvement$79kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $173,341, the rows itemized in this filing. The $349,471 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $176,130 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $123k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$19,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELECTROMAGNETIC SAFETY ALLIANCE INC$50,030
VISION QUEST 2020$42,049
SPECIAL OLYMPICS AZ$19,000
HOUSE OF REFUGE INC$19,000
DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY$16,740
RESILIENT ME$14,756
TIGER MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION INC$11,766
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $207k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THREE PRECIOUS MIRACLES: $72k → 11%MATFORCE: $6k → 14%CIRCLE THE CITY: $8k → 11%OAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC: $13k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $32k → 11%19NORTH: $17k → 11%ELAINE: $51k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $9k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 9 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
38

Total granted

$1.7M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-33%
+25%

Still filing today

78%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VQ
    VISION QUEST 2020
    3× · 2020–2025 · $440k · revenue ×16
  • MT
    MORE THAN A BED
    3× · 2023–2025 · $440k · revenue +21%
  • BH
    Banner Health Foundation
    2× · 2022–2023 · $31k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • SO
    State of Arizona
    one grant, 2021 · $256k
  • TP
    THE PEER & FAMILY CAREER ACADEMY LTD
    one grant, 2023 · $219k · revenue -6% · 65% of their budget
  • AA
    ARIZONA ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES CONSORTIUM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $136k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
3
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
4
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
5
Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

—
6
Adelante Healthcareinc

Mission: cultivate health by supporting individuals and the community at every step of their journey. vision: lead a future in which accessible, high-quality care sets the standard for all. adelante healthcare, a federally qualified health…

Health
7
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
8
Terros Inc

Terros health is a whole health, whole person integrated care provider delivering physical health care with specialization in substance use recovery, mental health, prevention, wellness and family services. terros health seeks to inspire…

Unclassified
9
Arizona's Children Association

The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.

Human Services
10
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
11
Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona

The Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona (CareAz) is a community-based organization dedicated to reducing the harmful effects of substance use disorder through comprehensive prevention, treatment, recovery, and reentry support.…

Health
12
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is House of Refuge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arizona Chronic Care Together Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
24/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

State of Arizona: $256,395 · OtherState of ArizonaTHE PEER & FAMILY CAREER ACADEMY LTD: $218,828 · OtherTHE PEER & FAMILY CAREER ACADEMY LTDArizona Community Action Association: $100,000 · OtherArizona Community Action AssociationDUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INC: $83,917 · OtherDUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INCUPWARD FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $60,000 · OtherTRINITY OPPORTUNITY ALLIANCE: $56,199 · OtherHacienda Childrens Hospital Inc: $50,000 · OtherHUMAN-ANIMAL CONNECTION: $47,593 · OtherCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY: $45,663 · Other+18 more: $254,027 · Other+18 moreVISION QUEST 2020: $440,184 · HealthVISION QUEST 2020Kyah Rayne Foundation: $100,789 · HealthKyah Rayne FoundationEMPOWERMENT SYSTEMS INC: $59,585 · HealthEMPOWERMENT SYSTEMS IN…Banner Health Foundation: $31,456 · Health+2 more: $38,898 · Health+2 moreMORE THAN A BED: $440,033 · Human ServicesMORE THAN A BEDThree Precious Miracles Inc: $71,516 · Human ServicesThree Precious Miracl…Elaine: $51,446 · Human ServicesElaineHUSHABYE NURSERY: $31,828 · Human Services+6 more: $71,746 · Human Services+6 moreElectromagnetic Safety Alliance Inc: $512,630 · EducationElectromagnetic Safe…LAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $90,000 · EducationLAW COLLEGE ASSOCIAT…+1 more: $5,500 · EducationARIZONA ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES CONSORTIUM INC: $135,753 · Crime & LegalLilys Pad: $101,446 · Youth DevelopmentLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $67,097 · Community ImprovementREGENERATING SONORA INC: $6,250 · Community ImprovementPhoenix Community ToolBank Inc: $5,500 · Community Improvement
Other$1,172,622Health$670,912Human Services$666,569Education$608,130Crime & Legal$135,753Youth Development$101,446Community Improvement$78,847

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetElectromagnetic Safety Alliance Inc: $512,630 over 6y, 85% of budgetMORE THAN A BED: $440,033 over 3y, 25% of budgetTHE PEER & FAMILY CAREER ACADEMY LTD: $218,828 over 1y, 65% of budgetLilys Pad: $101,446 over 1y, 32% of budgetKyah Rayne Foundation: $100,789 over 2y, 51% of budgetArizona Community Action Association: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $90,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INC: $83,917 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetThree Precious Miracles Inc: $71,516 over 1y, 53% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $67,097 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPWARD FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $60,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTRINITY OPPORTUNITY ALLIANCE: $56,199 over 1y, 59% of budgetElaine: $51,446 over 1y, 18% of budgetHacienda Childrens Hospital Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY: $45,663 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHUSHABYE NURSERY: $31,828 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBanner Health Foundation: $31,456 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC: $24,778 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSE OF REFUGE INC: $24,778 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHuman Services Campus Inc: $21,250 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetARIZONA CAREGIVER COALITION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetDIGNITY HEALTH: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetORCHARD COMMUNITY LEARNING SERVICE: $9,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $8,917 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE THE CITY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGENERATING SONORA INC: $6,250 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC: $5,742 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF ARIZONA INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMATFORCE YAVAPAI COUNTY SUBSTANCE ABUSE COALITION: $5,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPhoenix Community ToolBank Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetIMPRINTS OF HONOR: $5,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Thunderbirds CharitiesValley of the Sun Uni…Virginia G Piper Char…Mercy CareBHHS Legacy FoundationThe Diane and Bruce H…The Foundation for Co…John F Long Foundatio…The Board of VisitorsNina Mason Pulliam Ch…Dignity Health
Arizona Community FoundationAZ48.4× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Valley of the Sun United Way · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Mercy Care · BHHS Legacy Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · John F Long Foundation Inc · The Board of Visitors · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Dignity Health

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Technical Assistance Partnership of Arizona funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Technical Assistance Partnership of Arizona. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Technical Assistance Partnership of Arizona’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home