Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Technical Assistance Partnership of Arizona

To support organizations, activities, projects and strategies that strengthen community-based health services and better health outcomes for arizona's most underserved populations.

$349k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0169% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$671kHuman Services$667kEducation$608kCrime & Legal$136kYouth Development$101kCommunity Improvement$79kHousing & Shelter$46kRecreation & Sports$44kEnvironment$12kOther$1.1M
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $173,341 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $349,471 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $176,130 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $123k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$19,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELECTROMAGNETIC SAFETY ALLIANCE INC$50,030
VISION QUEST 2020$42,049
HOUSE OF REFUGE INC$19,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS AZ$19,000
DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY$16,740
RESILIENT ME$14,756
TIGER MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION INC$11,766
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $207k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THREE PRECIOUS MIRACLES: $72k → 11%MATFORCE: $6k → 14%CIRCLE THE CITY: $8k → 11%OAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC: $13k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $32k → 11%19NORTH: $17k → 11%ELAINE: $51k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $9k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 9 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
38

Total granted

$1.7M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-33%
+19%

Still filing today

78%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VQ
    VISION QUEST 2020
    3× · 2020–2025 · $440k · revenue ×16
  • MT
    MORE THAN A BED
    3× · 2023–2025 · $440k · revenue +21%
  • BH
    Banner Health Foundation
    2× · 2022–2023 · $31k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • SO
    State of Arizona
    one grant, 2021 · $256k
  • TP
    THE PEER & FAMILY CAREER ACADEMY LTD
    one grant, 2023 · $219k · revenue -6% · 65% of their budget
  • AA
    ARIZONA ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES CONSORTIUM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $136k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
3
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
4
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
5
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
6
Arizona's Children Association

The mission of arizona's children association is to protect children, empower youth, and strengthen families.

Human Services
7
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
8
Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

—
9
Adelante Healthcareinc

Mission: cultivate health by supporting individuals and the community at every step of their journey. vision: lead a future in which accessible, high-quality care sets the standard for all. adelante healthcare, a federally qualified health…

Health
10
Arizona Association of Community Health Centers Inc

To promote and facilitate the development and delivery of affordable and accessible primary healthcare for everyone in arizona through advocacy, education and technical assistance.

Health
11
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
12
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Valley and the most unlike its peers is Arizona Chronic Care Together Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyArizona Policy AdvocacyCollege Preparatory SchoolsDisability Services & Suppo…Arizona Healthcare AdvocacySenior Affordable HousingVeterans Service Organizati…Healthcare System Foundatio…Homeless & Family Support S…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number30%5%<5yr17%32%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr14%13%20–35yr10%18%35–55yr10%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value30%1%<5yr17%44%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr14%19%20–35yr10%12%35–55yr10%4%55yr+

The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/48
the rest of the field
17%
3,199/18,601

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
24/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

State of Arizona — $256,395 · OtherState of ArizonaTHE PEER & FAMILY CAREER ACADEMY LTD — $218,828 · OtherTHE PEER & FAMILY CAREER ACADEMY LTDArizona Community Action Association — $100,000 · OtherArizona Community Action AssociationDUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INC — $83,917 · OtherDUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INCUPWARD FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES — $60,000 · OtherTRINITY OPPORTUNITY ALLIANCE — $56,199 · OtherHacienda Childrens Hospital Inc — $50,000 · OtherHUMAN-ANIMAL CONNECTION — $47,593 · OtherCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY — $45,663 · Other+18 more — $254,027 · Other+18 moreVISION QUEST 2020 — $440,184 · HealthVISION QUEST 2020Kyah Rayne Foundation — $100,789 · HealthKyah Rayne FoundationEMPOWERMENT SYSTEMS INC — $59,585 · HealthEMPOWERMENT SYSTEMS IN…Banner Health Foundation — $31,456 · Health+2 more — $38,898 · Health+2 moreMORE THAN A BED — $440,033 · Human ServicesMORE THAN A BEDThree Precious Miracles Inc — $71,516 · Human ServicesThree Precious Miracl…Elaine — $51,446 · Human ServicesElaineHUSHABYE NURSERY — $31,828 · Human Services+6 more — $71,746 · Human Services+6 moreElectromagnetic Safety Alliance Inc — $512,630 · EducationElectromagnetic Safe…LAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA — $90,000 · EducationLAW COLLEGE ASSOCIAT…+1 more — $5,500 · EducationARIZONA ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES CONSORTIUM INC — $135,753 · Crime & LegalLilys Pad — $101,446 · Youth DevelopmentLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $67,097 · Community ImprovementREGENERATING SONORA INC — $6,250 · Community ImprovementPhoenix Community ToolBank Inc — $5,500 · Community Improvement
Other$1,172,622Health$670,912Human Services$666,569Education$608,130Crime & Legal$135,753Youth Development$101,446Community Improvement$78,847

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetElectromagnetic Safety Alliance Inc — $512,630 over 6y, 85% of budgetMORE THAN A BED — $440,033 over 3y, 25% of budgetTHE PEER & FAMILY CAREER ACADEMY LTD — $218,828 over 1y, 65% of budgetLilys Pad — $101,446 over 1y, 32% of budgetKyah Rayne Foundation — $100,789 over 2y, 51% of budgetArizona Community Action Association — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA — $90,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDUET PARTNERS IN HEALTH & AGING INC — $83,917 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetThree Precious Miracles Inc — $71,516 over 1y, 53% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $67,097 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPWARD FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES — $60,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTRINITY OPPORTUNITY ALLIANCE — $56,199 over 1y, 59% of budgetElaine — $51,446 over 1y, 18% of budgetHacienda Childrens Hospital Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY — $45,663 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHUSHABYE NURSERY — $31,828 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBanner Health Foundation — $31,456 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSE OF REFUGE INC — $24,778 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC — $24,778 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHuman Services Campus Inc — $21,250 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDIGNITY HEALTH — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA CAREGIVER COALITION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetOAKWOOD CREATIVE CARE INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetORCHARD COMMUNITY LEARNING SERVICE — $9,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetHospice of the Valley — $8,917 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE THE CITY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGENERATING SONORA INC — $6,250 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC — $5,742 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF ARIZONA INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMATFORCE YAVAPAI COUNTY SUBSTANCE ABUSE COALITION — $5,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPhoenix Community ToolBank Inc — $5,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetIMPRINTS OF HONOR — $5,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Thunderbirds CharitiesValley of the Sun Uni…Virginia G Piper Char…Mercy CareBHHS Legacy FoundationThe Diane and Bruce H…The Foundation for Co…John F Long Foundatio…The Board of VisitorsNina Mason Pulliam Ch…Dignity Health
Arizona Community FoundationAZ48.4× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Valley of the Sun United Way · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Mercy Care · BHHS Legacy Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · John F Long Foundation Inc · The Board of Visitors · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Dignity Health

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Technical Assistance Partnership of Arizona funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines