Skip to content
Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated With Ibt at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated With Ibt

To organize all workers eligible for membership, regardless of religion, race, creed, color, national origin, age or sex.

$670k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$106kHealth$88kEmployment$65kHousing & Shelter$40kHuman Services$38kPhilanthropy$25kPublic Benefit$8kCivil Rights$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $79,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $669,759 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $590,259 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$35,000
WORKERS SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION$14,500
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 174$10,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC$10,000
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE HEALEY COMMITTEE: $15k → 7%BEAUHAWKS FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%JENNIFER'S GIFT OF HOPE: $10k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WORCESTER: $5k → 11%HOME FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $10k → 11%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $10k → 16%HOME FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $10k → 7%ALL CHARITIES TEAMSTERS: $5k → 10%TEAMSTERS JC 42 CHARITY: $10k → 14%THOMAS R O'DONNELL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $5k → 6%WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION: $6k → 20%TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $35k → 14%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 299 COMMUNITY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $8k → 21%WORKERS SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $5k → 7%JAMES FORBES FAMILY TRUST: $5k → 8%HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $10k → 11%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $10k → 16%THOMAS R O'DONNELL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $5k → 6%TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $35k → 14%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 174: $10k → 9%NEUROFIBROMATOSIS INC NORTHEAST: $10k → 8%HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $10k → 11%THE NATHAN BURKE FUND: $10k → 16%TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10k → 14%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 174: $10k → 9%NEUROFIBROMATOSIS INC NORTHEAST: $8k → 8%HOME FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $10k → 11%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $10k → 16%JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $6k → 14%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 174 SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10k → 9%NEUROFIBROMATOSIS INC NORTHEAST: $5k → 8%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $10k → 16%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 174: $10k → 9%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $10k → 16%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
MI
NY
MA
CA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$253k · 7 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$253k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $80k · revenue +26%
  • TL
    TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +113% · 36% of their budget
  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $18k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • JG
    JENNIFERS GIFT OF HOPE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -89%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 137

Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.

—
2
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.

—
3
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffers Warehousemen Local No 554

The organization is a local teamsters union whose mission is to represent their union members in negotioations with employers.

—
4
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010

To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.

—
5
Teamsters Local 830 Scholarship Fund

To provide financial assistance to members of teamsters local 830 who are employed by participating employers and to the members' dependent children who have demonstrated scholastic ability, good character and qualities of leadership and…

—
6
Intl Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 252

The local union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights; involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is…

—
7
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 238

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
8
Teamsters Local 1205 Timothy Lynch Memorial Scholarship Fund

Teamsters local 1205 timothy lynch memorial scholarship fund exists for the purpose of making college education more easily accessible to the children and dependents of international brotherhood of teamsters local 1205 by providing…

Education
9
Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated With Ibt

To organize all workers eligible for membership, regardless of religion, race, creed, color, national origin, age or sex. to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organization, negotiation…

—
10
Laborers' Local 300 Scholarship Fund

To provide scholarships for families of local union members.

Education
11
Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen & Helpers- Local No 773

To organize workers and to secure improved wages, benefits and working conditions.

—
12
Massachusetts Afl-Cio Scholarship Corporation
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters All Charities Fund; the most unlike its peers is Thomas R O'donnell Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 174: $30,000 · OtherINTL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 174NEUROFIBROMATOSIS INC NORTHEAST: $22,500 · OtherNEUROFIBROMATOSIS INC NORTHEASTMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $17,940 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJENNIFERS GIFT OF HOPE INC: $10,499 · OtherJENNIFERS GIFT OF HOPE INCHOME FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $10,000 · OtherHOME FOR OUR TROOPS INCTEAMSTERS LOCAL 174 SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 · OtherTEAMSTERS LOCAL 174 SCHOLARSHIP FUNDTEAMSTERS JC 42 CHARITY: $10,000 · OtherTEAMSTERS JC 42 CHARITYTHE NATHAN BURKE FUND: $10,000 · OtherTHE NATHAN BURKE FUND+4 more: $20,000 · Other+4 moreINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $80,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD O…TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 10 NEW ENGLAND SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 · EducationTEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 10 …JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $5,500 · EducationJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHO…TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $60,000 · HealthTEAMSTERS LOCAL 25…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer…HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR O…WORKER SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $14,500 · EmploymentTHOMAS R O'DONNELL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTEAMSTERS LOCAL 299 COMMUNITY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Public BenefitWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $6,000 · Civil Rights
Other$155,939Education$95,500Health$65,000Housing & Shelter$40,000Employment$14,500Philanthropy$10,000Public Benefit$7,500Civil Rights$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $80,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $60,000 over 7y, 36% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 174: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEUROFIBROMATOSIS INC NORTHEAST: $22,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetWORKER SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $14,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetJENNIFERS GIFT OF HOPE INC: $10,499 over 1y, 18% of budgetTEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 10 NEW ENGLAND SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTHOMAS R O'DONNELL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTEAMSTERS LOCAL 299 COMMUNITY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTeamsters All Charities Fund: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WORCESTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…
International Brotherhood of TeamstersDC15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of Teamsters · International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH · International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated With Ibt funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated With Ibt. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Club of Worcester Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated With Ibt’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home