Skip to content
Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665

Promote the welfare and working conditions of members of teamsters local no.

$196k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Public Benefit$88kEmployment$71kPhilanthropy$40kCivil Rights$36kEducation$14kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $60,775, the rows itemized in this filing. The $195,620 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $134,845 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$6,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
All Charities Teamsters$17,000
NORTH BAY LABOR COUNCIL$13,300
NORTH BAY BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES$6,500
SAN FRANCISCO LABOR COUNCIL$6,500
JACKIE ELWARD FOR ASSEMBLY 2026$5,900
CATHERINE STEFANI FOR ASSEMBLY 2026$5,900
San Francisco Building&Construction Trades Council$5,675
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JACKIE ELWARD FOR ASSEMBLY 2026: $6k → 9%CATHERINE STEFANI FOR ASSEMBLY 2026: $6k → 10%A HOME FOR EVERYONE YES ON PROPS 1 AND 2: $10k → 10%NEWSOM FOR GOVERNOR 2018: $15k → 12%JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $8k → 14%NORTH BAY BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES: $7k → 9%All Charities Teamsters: $17k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO FOR LONDON BREED: $10k → 10%NEWSOM FOR CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR 2018: $14k → 12%JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $6k → 14%San Francisco Building&Construction Trades Council: $6k → 9%All Charities Teamsters: $9k → 10%FORWARD ACTION SF SUPPORTING LONDON 24: $10k → 10%CHRIS ROGERS FOR ASSEMBLY 2024: $6k → 12%SONOMA MEDIA GROUP: $6k → 9%All Charities Teamsters: $8k → 10%TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL NO 7: $20k → 10%NORTH BAY LABOR COUNCIL AFL-CIO COMMITTEE: $5k → 9%All Charities Teamsters: $6k → 10%NORTH COAST RESIDENT SUPPORTING ROGERS 24: $17k → 10%WORKERS AGAINST MEASURE J: $10k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO LABOR COUNCIL: $9k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO LABOR COUNCIL: $7k → 10%TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 665 PAC: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$115k · 5 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
12

Total granted

$115k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+36%

Still filing today

100%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Teamsters All Charities Fund
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +96%
  • NB
    North Bay Jobs With Justice
    3× · 2019–2021 · $22k · revenue ×12
  • JR
    JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $14k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • TJ
    Teamsters' Joint Council No 7graduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +45%
  • NC
    NORTH COAST RESIDENT SUPPORTING ROGERS 24
    one grant, 2024 · $17k
  • NF
    NEWSOM FOR GOVERNOR 2018
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Ca Construction Workers Unity Action Corporation

To promote the use of union building trades in construction projects in the bay area.

Employment
2
North Valley Labor Federation

The North Valley Labor Federations mission is to grow and strengthen the labor movement and build a strong political voice for working families in the Northern San Joaquin Valley.

—
3
San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council Afl-Cio

The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.

—
4
Contra Costa Labor Council Afl-Cio

The council is a federation of approximately 85 affiliated unions. the organizaton engages in a wide range of activities. the activities are designed to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace, and…

—
5
American Federation of Labor

To encourage all workers to share equally in the full benefits of union organization and to promulgate the principles ennunciated by the AFL-CIO to encourage workers to promote the principle of free collective bargainin

—
6
Afl-Cio Snohomish & Island County Labor Council

Member, affiliate, and community education for worker's issues - union and non-union

—
7
Teamsters Joint Council No75

Assist local unions in representing members in human relations issues.

—
8
Sacramento Central Labor Council

To benefit local trade unions and their members through education and promotion of union labor to the public.

—
9
California State Council of Service Employees

The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.

—
10
Central Coast Labor Council

To improve the lives of working families, bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our state and the nation.

—
11
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.

—
12
Ufcw District Union Local Two

To improve working conditions of its members and provide benefits of collective bargaining,

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters' Joint Council No 7; the most unlike its peers is A Home for Everyone Yes on Props 1 and 2. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Teamsters All Charities Fund: $40,300 · OtherTeamsters All Charities FundAmerican Federation of Labor & North Bay Labor Council: $24,280 · OtherAmerican Federation of Labor & North Bay Labor CouncilTeamsters' Joint Council No 7: $20,020 · OtherTeamsters' Joint Council No 7NORTH COAST RESIDENT SUPPORTING ROGERS 24: $17,000 · OtherNORTH COAST RESIDENT SUPPORTING ROGERS 24San Francisco Labor Council: $15,000 · OtherSan Francisco Labor CouncilNEWSOM FOR GOVERNOR 2018: $15,000 · OtherNEWSOM FOR GOVERNOR 2018NEWSOM FOR CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR 2018: $14,200 · OtherNEWSOM FOR CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR 2018A Home for Everyone Yes on Props 1 and 2: $10,000 · OtherWORKERS AGAINST MEASURE J: $9,750 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOR LONDON BREED: $9,500 · OtherFORWARD ACTION SF SUPPORTING LONDON 24: $9,500 · Other+8 more: $46,255 · Other+8 moreNorth Bay Jobs With Justice: $21,500 · Civil RightsNorth Bay…JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $14,000 · Education
Other$230,805Civil Rights$21,500Education$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTeamsters All Charities Fund: $40,300 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetAmerican Federation of Labor & North Bay Labor Council: $24,280 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetNorth Bay Jobs With Justice: $21,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetTeamsters' Joint Council No 7: $20,020 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSan Francisco Labor Council: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetA Home for Everyone Yes on Props 1 and 2: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTEAMSTERS AUTOMOTIVE & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 665: $5,580 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Brother…Sanitary Truck Driver…
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010CA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 · Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665?

    Find your warmest path to Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home