Skip to content
Team Evergreen Bicycle Club at a glance

· Public charity

Team Evergreen Bicycle Club

Team Evergreen actively supports bicycling and related activities to further the sport of cycling and provide its coninued growth and safe enjoyment.

$30k
Granted FY2020
13
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Recreation & Sports$181kYouth Development$83kEducation$75kReligion$25kHealth$18kPhilanthropy$17kHuman Services$13kHousing & Shelter$8kOther$0
02FY2020 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k8 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $102k
$8,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BICYCLE COLORADO$25,234
COMBA$24,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS CO$21,035
CO HIGH SCHOOL CYCLING LEAGUE$20,000
BICYCLE RACING ASSOC CO$12,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
PEO SISTERHOOD$8,600
CONIFER KIWANIS$6,325
FRONT RANGERS CYCLING CLUB$6,000
DAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION$6,000
BIKE JEFFCO$5,500
BOYSCOUT TROOP 1776$5,315
COMMUNITY FIRST FOUNDATION$5,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 67% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BIKE JEFFCO: $6k → 7%CONIFER KIWANIS: $6k → 7%CO Canine Rescue: $6k → 8%RAGE CYCLING: $9k → 12%PEO SISTERHOOD: $9k → 12%BIKE JEFFCO: $6k → 7%CONIFER KIWANIS: $6k → 7%SPECIAL OLYMPICS CO: $21k → 8%RAGE CYCLING: $9k → 12%PEO SISTERHOOD: $9k → 12%COMBA: $24k → 7%SPECIAL OLYMPICS CO: $21k → 8%DAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION: $6k → 12%PEO Sisterhood: $8k → 12%COMBA: $24k → 7%Special Olympics Colorado: $10k → 8%DAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION: $6k → 12%FRONT RANGERS CYCLING CLUB: $6k → 12%CO Mountain Bike Assoc-COMBA: $21k → 7%Special Olympics Colorado: $8k → 8%CO HIGH SCHOOL CYCLING LEAGUE: $20k → 12%FRONT RANGERS CYCLING CLUB: $6k → 12%CO Mountain Bike Assoc-COMBA: $11k → 7%CO HIGH SCHOOL CYCLING LEAGUE: $20k → 12%BICYCLE COLORADO: $25k → 12%Venture Crew 911: $6k → 7%CO High School Cycling League: $13k → 12%BICYCLE COLORADO: $25k → 12%COMMUNITY FIRST FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%CO High School Cycling League: $8k → 12%Bicycle Colorado: $15k → 12%COMMUNITY FIRST FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%Bicycle Colorado: $10k → 12%BICYCLE RACING ASSOC CO: $12k → 7%BICYCLE RACING ASSOC CO: $12k → 7%Bicycle Racing Assoc CO-BRAC: $6k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$418k · 13 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
6

Total granted

$418k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+4%

Still filing today

46%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Recreation & SportsEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    Colorado Mountain Bike Association
    4× · 2017–2020 · $80k · revenue +758%
  • BC
    BICYCLE COLORADO
    4× · 2017–2020 · $75k · revenue +31%
  • CH
    COLORADO HIGH SCHOOL CYCLING LEAGUE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $61k · revenue +127%

Funded once

  • DS
    Drive Smart of the Rockies
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -69%
  • VM
    VAIL MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROUP INC
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +8%
  • EP
    Evergreen Players Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boulder Valley Cycling Alliance

Develop, coach and inspire junior cycling athletes

Recreation & Sports
2
Routt County Riders

Routt County Riders advocates to implement positive change for cyclists in Northwest Colorado.

Education
3
Stronger Faster Boulder Co
Recreation & Sports
4
Pikes Peak Athletic Foundation
Recreation & Sports
5
Pchsmtb

Middle and high school MT bike team

—
6
Boulder County Injured and Fallen Officer Foundation
Public Safety & Disaster
7
Boulder Mountainbike Alliance

The Boulder Mountainbike Alliance exists to serve as a positive voice for mountain biking in the greater Boulder County, Colorado area by improving the trail experience for all users through social rides and events, advocacy, and trail…

Recreation & Sports
8
Skyline Mountain Bike Team Inc
Recreation & Sports
9
Vail Valley Mountain Bike Association

The VVMTA's mission is to connect our coummunity to the outdoors through sustainable recreation. The VVMTA advocates for soft surface trails, manages trail stewardship programs, maintains and builds trails, coordinates and trains…

Environment
10
The Colorado Parks Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
11
Grand Valley Youth Cycling

Youth Recreation and Sport Development in Cycling

Recreation & Sports
12
Colorado Plateau Mountain Bike Trail Association Inc

Build, maintain, and advocate for sustainable mountain biking trails in western colorado.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bicycle Colorado; the most unlike its peers is Colorado Mountain Bike Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Bicycle Racing Association of Colo The ACA: $29,500 · OtherBicycle Racing Association of Colo The A…PEO SISTERHOOD INTERNATIONAL CHAPTER: $25,200 · OtherPEO SISTERHOOD INTERNATIONAL CHAPTERIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONIFER KIWANIS: $12,650 · OtherCONIFER KIWANISFront Rangers Cycling Club Inc: $12,000 · OtherFront Rangers Cycling Club IncDAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION: $12,000 · OtherDAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATIONBIKE JEFFCO INC: $11,000 · OtherBIKE JEFFCO INCBOYSCOUT TROOP 1776: $10,630 · OtherBOYSCOUT TROOP 1776COMMUNITY FIRST FOUNDATION: $10,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FIRST FOUNDATIONDrive Smart of the Rockies: $8,000 · OtherVAIL MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROUP INC: $8,000 · OtherCOLORADO CANINE RESCUE: $6,000 · OtherColorado Mountain Bike Association: $80,000 · Recreation & SportsColorado Mountain Bike AssociationSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO: $60,070 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADOBICYCLE COLORADO: $75,468 · EducationBICYCLE COLORADOCOLORADO HIGH SCHOOL CYCLING LEAGUE: $60,500 · Youth DevelopmentCOLORADO HIGH …Evergreen Players Inc: $7,000 · Arts & CultureBlue Spruce Evergreen Kiwanis Foundation Inc: $6,000 · PhilanthropyCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO: $6,000 · Health
Other$163,480Recreation & Sports$140,070Education$75,468Youth Development$60,500Arts & Culture$7,000Philanthropy$6,000Health$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColorado Mountain Bike Association: $80,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetBICYCLE COLORADO: $75,468 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCOLORADO HIGH SCHOOL CYCLING LEAGUE: $60,500 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO: $60,070 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBicycle Racing Association of Colo The ACA: $29,500 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetFront Rangers Cycling Club Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetDAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDrive Smart of the Rockies: $8,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetEvergreen Players Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shift EventsColorado Gives Founda…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Shift EventsCO20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shift Events · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Team Evergreen Bicycle Club funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Team Evergreen Bicycle Club. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Team Evergreen Bicycle Club?

    Find your warmest path to Team Evergreen Bicycle Club through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Team Evergreen Bicycle Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home